These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
786 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25164022)
1. Embryo vitrification using a novel semi-automated closed system yields in vitro outcomes equivalent to the manual Cryotop method. Roy TK; Brandi S; Tappe NM; Bradley CK; Vom E; Henderson C; Lewis C; Battista K; Hobbs B; Hobbs S; Syer J; Lanyon SR; Dopheide SM; Peura TT; McArthur SJ; Bowman MC; Stojanov T Hum Reprod; 2014 Nov; 29(11):2431-8. PubMed ID: 25164022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomised, multi-center, open trial comparing a semi-automated closed vitrification system with a manual open system in women undergoing IVF. Hajek J; Baron R; Sandi-Monroy N; Schansker S; Schoepper B; Depenbusch M; Schultze-Mosgau A; Neumann K; Gagsteiger F; von Otte S; Griesinger G Hum Reprod; 2021 Jul; 36(8):2101-2110. PubMed ID: 34131726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Barcode tagging of human oocytes and embryos to prevent mix-ups in assisted reproduction technologies. Novo S; Nogués C; Penon O; Barrios L; Santaló J; Gómez-Martínez R; Esteve J; Errachid A; Plaza JA; Pérez-García L; Ibáñez E Hum Reprod; 2014 Jan; 29(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 24227078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study. Li Z; Wang YA; Ledger W; Edgar DH; Sullivan EA Hum Reprod; 2014 Dec; 29(12):2794-801. PubMed ID: 25316444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pregnancy and birth outcomes following fresh or vitrified embryo transfer according to blastocyst morphology and expansion stage, and culturing strategy for delayed development. Wirleitner B; Schuff M; Stecher A; Murtinger M; Vanderzwalmen P Hum Reprod; 2016 Aug; 31(8):1685-95. PubMed ID: 27270972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after transfer of vitrified early cleavage embryos. Liu SY; Teng B; Fu J; Li X; Zheng Y; Sun XX Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2093-100. PubMed ID: 23569081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Testing an artificial intelligence algorithm to predict fetal heartbeat of vitrified-warmed blastocysts from a single image: predictive ability in different settings. Conversa L; Bori L; Insua F; Marqueño S; Cobo A; Meseguer M Hum Reprod; 2024 Oct; 39(10):2240-2248. PubMed ID: 39173597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of cell loss after vitrification or slow-freezing on further in vitro development and implantation of human Day 3 embryos. Van Landuyt L; Van de Velde H; De Vos A; Haentjens P; Blockeel C; Tournaye H; Verheyen G Hum Reprod; 2013 Nov; 28(11):2943-9. PubMed ID: 24014599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A prospective randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of artificial shrinkage (collapse) on the implantation potential of vitrified blastocysts. Van Landuyt L; Polyzos NP; De Munck N; Blockeel C; Van de Velde H; Verheyen G Hum Reprod; 2015 Nov; 30(11):2509-18. PubMed ID: 26364080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How does vitrification affect oocyte viability in oocyte donation cycles? A prospective study to compare outcomes achieved with fresh versus vitrified sibling oocytes. Solé M; Santaló J; Boada M; Clua E; Rodríguez I; Martínez F; Coroleu B; Barri PN; Veiga A Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2087-92. PubMed ID: 23744895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Associations of blastocyst features, trophectoderm biopsy and other laboratory practice with post-warming behavior and implantation. Cimadomo D; Capalbo A; Levi-Setti PE; Soscia D; Orlando G; Albani E; Parini V; Stoppa M; Dovere L; Tacconi L; Ievoli E; Maggiulli R; Ubaldi FM; Rienzi L Hum Reprod; 2018 Nov; 33(11):1992-2001. PubMed ID: 30265329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lower intracellular concentration of cryoprotectants after vitrification than after slow freezing despite exposure to higher concentration of cryoprotectant solutions. Vanderzwalmen P; Connan D; Grobet L; Wirleitner B; Remy B; Vanderzwalmen S; Zech N; Ectors FJ Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2101-10. PubMed ID: 23592220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Single-embryo transfer of vitrified-warmed blastocysts yields equivalent live-birth rates and improved neonatal outcomes compared with fresh transfers. Roy TK; Bradley CK; Bowman MC; McArthur SJ Fertil Steril; 2014 May; 101(5):1294-301. PubMed ID: 24582521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Vitrification of cleavage stage day 3 embryos results in higher live birth rates than conventional slow freezing: a RCT. Debrock S; Peeraer K; Fernandez Gallardo E; De Neubourg D; Spiessens C; D'Hooghe TM Hum Reprod; 2015 Aug; 30(8):1820-30. PubMed ID: 26089301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Vitrification and in-straw warming do not affect pregnancy rates of biopsied bovine embryos. González-Rodríguez N; Martínez-Rodero I; Scherzer J; Jung S; Reichenbach M; Zablotski Y; Otzdorff C; Zerbe H; Mogas T Theriogenology; 2022 Oct; 191():221-230. PubMed ID: 35998405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Survival of vitrified in vitro-produced bovine embryos after a one-step warming in-straw cryoprotectant dilution procedure. Caamaño JN; Gómez E; Trigal B; Muñoz M; Carrocera S; Martín D; Díez C Theriogenology; 2015 Mar; 83(5):881-90. PubMed ID: 25542458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Outcomes of vitrified early cleavage-stage and blastocyst-stage embryos in a cryopreservation program: evaluation of 3,150 warming cycles. Cobo A; de los Santos MJ; Castellò D; Gámiz P; Campos P; Remohí J Fertil Steril; 2012 Nov; 98(5):1138-46.e1. PubMed ID: 22862909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Neonatal health including congenital malformation risk of 1072 children born after vitrified embryo transfer. Belva F; Bonduelle M; Roelants M; Verheyen G; Van Landuyt L Hum Reprod; 2016 Jul; 31(7):1610-20. PubMed ID: 27165622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The time aspect in storing vitrified blastocysts: its impact on survival rate, implantation potential and babies born. Wirleitner B; Vanderzwalmen P; Bach M; Baramsai B; Neyer A; Schwerda D; Schuff M; Spitzer D; Stecher A; Zintz M; Zech NH Hum Reprod; 2013 Nov; 28(11):2950-7. PubMed ID: 24030587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]