These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25164062)

  • 1. Cervical vertebrae maturation, dentoalveolar, head postural and respiratory parameters in predicting the stable outcome of face-mask treatment.
    Lee KM; Chung DH; Lee JW; Lee SM
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 37(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 25164062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the effects of face mask treatment started simultaneously and after the completion of the alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction procedure.
    Canturk BH; Celikoglu M
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Mar; 85(2):284-91. PubMed ID: 25017013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dentoalveolar compensation according to skeletal discrepancy and overjet in skeletal Class III patients.
    Kim SJ; Kim KH; Yu HS; Baik HS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):317-24. PubMed ID: 24582023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Soft and hard tissue profile changes after rapid maxillary expansion and face mask therapy.
    Kurt G; Uysal T; Yagci A
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e10-8. PubMed ID: 21490978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cervical vertebral column morphology and head posture in preorthodontic patients with anterior open bite.
    Kim P; Sarauw MT; Sonnesen L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):359-66. PubMed ID: 24582027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early Alt-RAMEC and facial mask protocol in class III malocclusion.
    Franchi L; Baccetti T; Masucci C; Defraia E
    J Clin Orthod; 2011 Nov; 45(11):601-9. PubMed ID: 22500360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment.
    Ngan P; Wilmes B; Drescher D; Martin C; Weaver B; Gunel E
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():26. PubMed ID: 26303311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of modified and conventional facemask therapies with expansion on dynamic measurement of natural head position in Class III patients.
    Yagci A; Uysal T; Usumez S; Orhan M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):e223-31. PubMed ID: 22051500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dentofacial effects of skeletal anchored treatment modalities for the correction of maxillary retrognathia.
    Sar C; Sahinoğlu Z; Özçirpici AA; Uçkan S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 24373654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship between mandibular anterior crowding and lateral dentofacial morphology in the early mixed dentition.
    Türkkahraman H; Sayin MO
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):759-64. PubMed ID: 15673137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors contributing to stability of protraction facemask treatment of Class III malocclusion.
    Gu Y
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 Nov; 26(2):171-7. PubMed ID: 21175028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The efficacy of Hybrid Hyrax-Mentoplate combination in early Class III treatment: a novel approach and pilot study.
    Katyal V; Wilmes B; Nienkemper M; Darendeliler MA; Sampson W; Drescher D
    Aust Orthod J; 2016 May; 32(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 27468596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Response of maxillary retrusion cases to face mask treatment.
    Ramadan AA
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):e29-34. PubMed ID: 19641766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative evaluation of maxillary protraction with or without skeletal anchorage.
    Sar C; Arman-Özçırpıcı A; Uçkan S; Yazıcı AC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 May; 139(5):636-49. PubMed ID: 21536207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cephalometric variables predicting the long-term success or failure of combined rapid maxillary expansion and facial mask therapy.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jul; 126(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 15224054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Skeletal and dental variables related to the stability of orthognathic surgery in skeletal Class III malocclusion with a surgery-first approach.
    Ko EW; Lin SC; Chen YR; Huang CS
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 May; 71(5):e215-23. PubMed ID: 23455415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study.
    Sharma AK; Sachdev V; Singla A; Kirtaniya BC
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cephalometric changes after the correction of class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion/facemask therapy.
    Macdonald KE; Kapust AJ; Turley PK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jul; 116(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 10393575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anterior maxillary dentoalveolar and skeletal cephalometric factors involved in upper incisor crown exposure in subjects with Class II and III skeletal open bite.
    Arriola-Guillén LE; Flores-Mir C
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jan; 85(1):72-9. PubMed ID: 24708039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of maxillary protraction and its long-term stability--a clinical trial in Chinese adolescents.
    Chen L; Chen R; Yang Y; Ji G; Shen G
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 21325335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.