These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25164062)

  • 21. Dentoalveolar response after protraction mask and expansion in males and females in the mixed dentition.
    Saadia M; Torres E
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2001; 25(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 11314208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Relapse and stability after mandibular setback surgery one year postoperatively: a retrospective study.
    Halvorsen ET; Beddari IY; Schilbred Eriksen E; Boe OE; Wisth PJ; Loes S; Moen K
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 72(6):1181.e1-11. PubMed ID: 24831939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Long-term effects of Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by fixed appliances.
    Westwood PV; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Sarver DM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):306-20. PubMed ID: 12637903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Treatment and posttreatment effects of a facial mask combined with a bite-block appliance in Class III malocclusion.
    Cozza P; Baccetti T; Mucedero M; Pavoni C; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 20816299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Early treatment of class III malocclusion.
    Kumar A; Rohilla A; Tandon P; Nager A
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2014; 25(2):41-5. PubMed ID: 25109058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Analysis of Class II patients, successfully treated with the straight-wire and Forsus appliances, based on cervical vertebral maturation status.
    Servello DF; Fallis DW; Alvetro L
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jan; 85(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 24849243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Skeletal and dental effects of a mini maxillary protraction appliance.
    Altug Z; Arslan AD
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):360-8. PubMed ID: 16637712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cephalometric determinants of successful functional appliance therapy.
    Patel HP; Moseley HC; Noar JH
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):410-7. PubMed ID: 12401049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Incremental effects of facemask therapy associated with intermaxillary mechanics.
    Thiesen G; Fontes Jde O; Zastrow MD; May NB
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 20575205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Growth modulation using functional appliances--cephalometric predictors of successful response.
    Kumar SA; Shetty KS; Prakash AT
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e50-9. PubMed ID: 23646338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Profile changes associated with different orthopedic treatment approaches in Class III malocclusions.
    Arman A; Toygar TU; Abuhijleh E
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):733-40. PubMed ID: 15673133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Craniofacial parameters of Syrian children with β-thalassemia major.
    Takriti M; Dashash M
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 May; 2(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 25426607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A cephalometric analysis of the relationship between facial pattern, interincisal angulation and anterior overbite changes.
    Ludwig M
    Angle Orthod; 1967 Jul; 37(3):194-204. PubMed ID: 19919215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effects of face mask and tongue plate on maxillary deficiency in growing patients: a randomized clinical trial.
    Showkatbakhsh R; Toumarian L; Jamilian A; Sheibaninia A; Mirkarimi M; Taban T
    J Orthod; 2013 Jun; 40(2):130-6. PubMed ID: 23794693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Modified Alt-RAMEC treatment of Class III malocclusion in young patients with Down syndrome.
    Rey D; Campuzano A; Ngan P
    J Clin Orthod; 2015 Feb; 49(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 26106816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cephalometric variables used to predict the success of interceptive treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and face mask. A longitudinal study.
    Nardoni DN; Siqueira DF; Cardoso Mde A; Capelozza Filho L
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(1):85-96. PubMed ID: 25741830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The cervical vertebrae maturation (CVM) method cannot predict craniofacial growth in girls with Class II malocclusion.
    Engel TP; Renkema AM; Katsaros C; Pazera P; Pandis N; Fudalej PS
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Feb; 38(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 25667036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Skeletal changes of maxillary protraction in patients exhibiting skeletal class III malocclusion: a comparison of three skeletal maturation groups.
    Cha KS
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Feb; 73(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 12607852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cranial-base morphology in adults with skeletal Class III malocclusion.
    Sanggarnjanavanich S; Sekiya T; Nomura Y; Nakayama T; Hanada N; Nakamura Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jul; 146(1):82-91. PubMed ID: 24975002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Molar heights and incisor inclinations in adults with Class II and Class III skeletal open-bite malocclusions.
    Arriola-Guillén LE; Flores-Mir C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 24582024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.