These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25165444)

  • 1. Increasing the reliability of data analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging by applying a new blockwise permutation method.
    Adolf D; Weston S; Baecke S; Luchtmann M; Bernarding J; Kropf S
    Front Neuroinform; 2014; 8():72. PubMed ID: 25165444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates.
    Eklund A; Nichols TE; Knutsson H
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Jul; 113(28):7900-5. PubMed ID: 27357684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cluster success: fMRI inferences for spatial extent have acceptable false-positive rates.
    Slotnick SD
    Cogn Neurosci; 2017 Jul; 8(3):150-155. PubMed ID: 28403749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accounting for Non-Gaussian Sources of Spatial Correlation in Parametric Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Paradigms II: A Method to Obtain First-Level Analysis Residuals with Uniform and Gaussian Spatial Autocorrelation Function and Independent and Identically Distributed Time-Series.
    Gopinath K; Krishnamurthy V; Lacey S; Sathian K
    Brain Connect; 2018 Feb; 8(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 29161884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accounting for Non-Gaussian Sources of Spatial Correlation in Parametric Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Paradigms I: Revisiting Cluster-Based Inferences.
    Gopinath K; Krishnamurthy V; Sathian K
    Brain Connect; 2018 Feb; 8(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 28927289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does parametric fMRI analysis with SPM yield valid results? An empirical study of 1484 rest datasets.
    Eklund A; Andersson M; Josephson C; Johannesson M; Knutsson H
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jul; 61(3):565-78. PubMed ID: 22507229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Resting-state fMRI data reflects default network activity rather than null data: A defense of commonly employed methods to correct for multiple comparisons.
    Slotnick SD
    Cogn Neurosci; 2017 Jul; 8(3):141-143. PubMed ID: 28002981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sources of residual autocorrelation in multiband task fMRI and strategies for effective mitigation.
    Parlak F; Pham DD; Spencer DA; Welsh RC; Mejia AF
    Front Neurosci; 2022; 16():1051424. PubMed ID: 36685218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: a primer with examples.
    Nichols TE; Holmes AP
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2002 Jan; 15(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 11747097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A cluster mass permutation test with contextual enhancement for fMRI activation detection.
    Tillikainen L; Salli E; Korvenoja A; Aronen HJ
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(2):654-64. PubMed ID: 16769226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hidden Markov event sequence models: toward unsupervised functional MRI brain mapping.
    Faisan S; Thoraval L; Armspach JP; Foucher JR; Metz-Lutz MN; Heitz F
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Jan; 12(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 15691723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New blockwise permutation tests preserving exchangeability in functional neuroimaging.
    Zhou C; Wang YM
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():6977-80. PubMed ID: 19964721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. fMRI analysis on the GPU-possibilities and challenges.
    Eklund A; Andersson M; Knutsson H
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2012 Feb; 105(2):145-61. PubMed ID: 21862169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Controlling the familywise error rate in widefield optical neuroimaging of functional connectivity in mice.
    White BR; Chan C; Adepoju T; Shinohara RT; Vandekar S
    Neurophotonics; 2023 Jan; 10(1):015004. PubMed ID: 36756004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficient Blockwise Permutation Tests Preserving Exchangeability.
    Zhou C; Zwilling CE; Calhoun VD; Wang MY
    Int J Stat Med Res; 2014 Apr; 3(2):145-152. PubMed ID: 25289113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Permutation and parametric tests for effect sizes in voxel-based morphometry of gray matter volume in brain structural MRI.
    Dickie DA; Mikhael S; Job DE; Wardlaw JM; Laidlaw DH; Bastin ME
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Dec; 33(10):1299-1305. PubMed ID: 26253778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Input permutation method to detect active voxels in fMRI study.
    Lee SH; Lim J; Park D; Biswal BB; Petkova E
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Dec; 30(10):1495-504. PubMed ID: 22819177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Permutation testing made practical for functional magnetic resonance image analysis.
    Belmonte M; Yurgelun-Todd D
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Mar; 20(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 11341714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of family-wise error rates in statistical parametric mapping using random field theory.
    Flandin G; Friston KJ
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2019 May; 40(7):2052-2054. PubMed ID: 29091338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Permutation-based true discovery proportions for functional magnetic resonance imaging cluster analysis.
    Andreella A; Hemerik J; Finos L; Weeda W; Goeman J
    Stat Med; 2023 Jun; 42(14):2311-2340. PubMed ID: 37259808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.