These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25165486)

  • 21. Determining the genome-wide kinship coefficient seems unhelpful in distinguishing consanguineous couples with a high versus low risk for adverse reproductive outcome.
    Kelmemi W; Teeuw ME; Bochdanovits Z; Ouburg S; Jonker MA; Alkuraya F; Hashem M; Kayserili H; van Haeringen A; Sheridan E; Masri A; Cobben JM; Rizzu P; Kostense PJ; Dommering CJ; Henneman L; Bouhamed-Chaabouni H; Heutink P; Ten Kate LP; Cornel MC
    BMC Med Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():50. PubMed ID: 26188928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Nonparametric simulation-based statistics for detecting linkage in general pedigrees.
    Davis S; Schroeder M; Goldin LR; Weeks DE
    Am J Hum Genet; 1996 Apr; 58(4):867-80. PubMed ID: 8644751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Pairwise relatedness testing in the context of inbreeding: expectation and variance of the likelihood ratio.
    Brustad HK; Vigeland MD; Egeland T
    Int J Legal Med; 2021 Jan; 135(1):117-129. PubMed ID: 32989564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Inference of kinship using spatial distributions of SNPs for genome-wide association studies.
    Lee H; Chen L
    BMC Genomics; 2016 May; 17():372. PubMed ID: 27206321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Approximating identity-by-descent matrices using multiple haplotype configurations on pedigrees.
    Gao G; Hoeschele I
    Genetics; 2005 Sep; 171(1):365-76. PubMed ID: 15965257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Linkage analysis without defined pedigrees.
    Day-Williams AG; Blangero J; Dyer TD; Lange K; Sobel EM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2011 Jul; 35(5):360-70. PubMed ID: 21465549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Some developments on the affected-pedigree-member method of linkage analysis.
    Ward PJ
    Am J Hum Genet; 1993 Jun; 52(6):1200-15. PubMed ID: 8099256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Handling marker-marker linkage disequilibrium: pedigree analysis with clustered markers.
    Abecasis GR; Wigginton JE
    Am J Hum Genet; 2005 Nov; 77(5):754-67. PubMed ID: 16252236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Universal algoritihms for paternity index in trios and its extended application].
    Que TZ; Zhang SH; Zhao SM
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Oct; 27(5):334-6. PubMed ID: 22259858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Improved estimation of inbreeding and kinship in pigs using optimized SNP panels.
    Lopes MS; Silva FF; Harlizius B; Duijvesteijn N; Lopes PS; Guimarães SE; Knol EF
    BMC Genet; 2013 Sep; 14():92. PubMed ID: 24063757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Utility of ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Prep Kit in the research of pairwise 2nd-degree kinship identification.
    Xu M; Du Q; Ma G; Chen Z; Liu Q; Fu L; Cong B; Li S
    Int J Legal Med; 2019 Nov; 133(6):1641-1650. PubMed ID: 30687898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A Unified Characterization of Population Structure and Relatedness.
    Weir BS; Goudet J
    Genetics; 2017 Aug; 206(4):2085-2103. PubMed ID: 28550018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. IPED: inheritance path-based pedigree reconstruction algorithm using genotype data.
    He D; Wang Z; Han B; Parida L; Eskin E
    J Comput Biol; 2013 Oct; 20(10):780-91. PubMed ID: 24093229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Identity-by-descent estimation and mapping of qualitative traits in large, complex pedigrees.
    Abney M
    Genetics; 2008 Jul; 179(3):1577-90. PubMed ID: 18622032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Two-locus and three-locus gene identity by descent in pedigrees.
    Thompson EA
    IMA J Math Appl Med Biol; 1988; 5(4):261-79. PubMed ID: 3241098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Variance and covariance of actual relationships between relatives at one locus.
    Garcia-Cortes LA; Legarra A; Chevalet C; Toro MA
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(2):e57003. PubMed ID: 23451134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluating the utility of identity-by-descent segment numbers for relatedness inference via information theory and classification.
    Smith J; Qiao Y; Williams AL
    G3 (Bethesda); 2022 May; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 35348675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessment of relationships between pigs based on pedigree and genomic information.
    Zhang J; Song H; Zhang Q; Ding X
    Animal; 2020 Apr; 14(4):697-705. PubMed ID: 31708004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cross-Generation Kinship Verification with Sparse Discriminative Metric.
    Wang S; Ding Z; Fu Y
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2019 Nov; 41(11):2783-2790. PubMed ID: 30072315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Numericware N: Numerator Relationship Matrix Calculator.
    Kim B; Beavis WD; Léon J
    J Hered; 2016; 107(7):686-690. PubMed ID: 27729447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.