These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25165693)
1. Clinical outcome and wound healing following carpal tunnel decompression: a comparison of two common suture materials. MacFarlane RJ; Donnelly TD; Khan Y; Morapudi S; Waseem M; Fischer J Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():270137. PubMed ID: 25165693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Absorbable versus non-absorbable suture in carpal tunnel decompression. Erel E; Pleasance PI; Ahmed O; Hart NB J Hand Surg Br; 2001 Apr; 26(2):157-8. PubMed ID: 11281671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Skin closure in carpal tunnel surgery: a prospective comparative study between nylon, polyglactin 910 and stainless steel sutures. Menovsky T; Bartels RH; van Lindert EL; Grotenhuis JA Hand Surg; 2004 Jul; 9(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 15368623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative study of surgical wound closure with nylon interrupted sutures and running subcuticular vicryl rapide suture after open release of the carpal tunnel. Tzimas V; Kotsias C; Galanis C; Panagiotakopoulos G; Tsiampas D; Parnis J; Tilkeridis K; Fiska A Scars Burn Heal; 2022; 8():20595131221128951. PubMed ID: 36200049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tissue Adhesive versus Skin Suture plus Waterproof Wound Dressings for Carpal Tunnel Wound Closure: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Maneesrisajja T; Srikulawong K Malays Orthop J; 2024 Jul; 18(2):63-70. PubMed ID: 39130506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of suture choice on biomechanics and physeal status after bioenhanced anterior cruciate ligament repair in skeletally immature patients: a large-animal study. Vavken P; Proffen B; Peterson C; Fleming BC; Machan JT; Murray MM Arthroscopy; 2013 Jan; 29(1):122-32. PubMed ID: 23200845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical outcome and cost comparison of carpal tunnel wound closure with monocryl and ethilon: a prospective study. Dosani A; Khan SK; Gray S; Joseph S; Whittaker IA Hand Surg; 2013; 18(2):189-92. PubMed ID: 24164122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intraoperative handling and wound healing: controlled clinical trial comparing coated VICRYL plus antibacterial suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture with triclosan) with coated VICRYL suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture). Ford HR; Jones P; Gaines B; Reblock K; Simpkins DL Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2005; 6(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 16201941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of cosmetic outcomes of lacerations on the extremities and trunk using absorbable versus nonabsorbable sutures. Tejani C; Sivitz AB; Rosen MD; Nakanishi AK; Flood RG; Clott MA; Saccone PG; Luck RP Acad Emerg Med; 2014 Jun; 21(6):637-43. PubMed ID: 25039547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Including a Vessel Loop in Wound Closure Facilitates Suture Removal Following Open Carpal Tunnel Release. Frazier MC; Tomooka LBH; Foeger N; Hagan HJ; Apel PJ Hand (N Y); 2023 Jan; 18(1_suppl):84S-90S. PubMed ID: 35658685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A prospective randomised trial of absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for wound closure after fasciectomy for Dupuytren's contracture. Howard K; Simison AJ; Morris A; Bhalaik V J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2009 Oct; 34(5):618-20. PubMed ID: 19687084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Photographic assessment of postsurgical facial scars epidermally sutured with rapidly absorbable polyglactin 910 or nylon: A randomized clinical trial. Moran B; Humphrey S; Seal A; Berkowitz J; Zloty D J Am Acad Dermatol; 2020 Nov; 83(5):1395-1399. PubMed ID: 32534080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cosmetic outcome and surgical site infection rates of antibacterial absorbable (Polyglactin 910) suture compared to Chinese silk suture in breast cancer surgery: a randomized pilot research. Zhang ZT; Zhang HW; Fang XD; Wang LM; Li XX; Li YF; Sun XW; Carver J; Simpkins D; Shen J; Weisberg M Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Mar; 124(5):719-24. PubMed ID: 21518565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the Efficacies of Vicryl Rapide and Prolene Sutures in Transcolumellar Incision. Savran F; Bayram F Otolaryngol Pol; 2024 Apr; 78(2):23-28. PubMed ID: 38623859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of 7/0 Vicryl (coated polyglactin 910) and 7/0 Vicryl-rapide (irradiated polyglactin 910) in skin closure in ophthalmic plastic surgery. Talbot AW; Meadows AE; Tyers AG; Shah-Desai S Orbit; 2002 Mar; 21(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 12029576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of absorbable with nonabsorbable sutures in closure of facial skin wounds. Parell GJ; Becker GD Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2003; 5(6):488-90. PubMed ID: 14623686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A randomised controlled trial of absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for skin closure after open carpal tunnel release. Theopold C; Potter S; Dempsey M; O'Shaughnessy M J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2012 May; 37(4):350-3. PubMed ID: 21987279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of suture material and suture technique on collagen fibril diameters in midline laparotomies. Höer J; Anurov M; Titkova S; Klinge U; Töns C; Ottinger A; Schumpelick V Eur Surg Res; 2000; 32(6):359-67. PubMed ID: 11182620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Retrospective Review of Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence: Comparing Absorbable and Nonabsorbable Sutures. MacKoul P; Danilyants N; Sarfoh V; van der Does L; Kazi N J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):122-128. PubMed ID: 30853572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]