206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25165771)
1. Why climate change will invariably alter selection pressures on phenology.
Gienapp P; Reed TE; Visser ME
Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Oct; 281(1793):. PubMed ID: 25165771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Climate change, breeding date and nestling diet: how temperature differentially affects seasonal changes in pied flycatcher diet depending on habitat variation.
Burger C; Belskii E; Eeva T; Laaksonen T; Mägi M; Mänd R; Qvarnström A; Slagsvold T; Veen T; Visser ME; Wiebe KL; Wiley C; Wright J; Both C
J Anim Ecol; 2012 Jul; 81(4):926-36. PubMed ID: 22356622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Phenology of forest caterpillars and their host trees: the importance of synchrony.
van Asch M; Visser ME
Annu Rev Entomol; 2007; 52():37-55. PubMed ID: 16842033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Current spring warming as a driver of selection on reproductive timing in a wild passerine.
Marrot P; Charmantier A; Blondel J; Garant D
J Anim Ecol; 2018 May; 87(3):754-764. PubMed ID: 29337354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How Resource Phenology Affects Consumer Population Dynamics.
Bewick S; Cantrell RS; Cosner C; Fagan WF
Am Nat; 2016 Feb; 187(2):151-66. PubMed ID: 26807744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adaptation of reproductive phenology to climate change with ecological feedback via dominance hierarchies.
Johansson J; Smith HG; Jonzén N
J Anim Ecol; 2014 Mar; 83(2):440-9. PubMed ID: 24237260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How interacting anthropogenic pressures alter the plasticity of breeding time in two common songbirds.
Cuchot P; Bonnet T; Dehorter O; Henry PY; Teplitsky C
J Anim Ecol; 2024 Jul; 93(7):918-931. PubMed ID: 38790091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Environmental controls on the phenology of moths: predicting plasticity and constraint under climate change.
Valtonen A; Ayres MP; Roininen H; Pöyry J; Leinonen R
Oecologia; 2011 Jan; 165(1):237-48. PubMed ID: 20882390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Climate change does not equally affect temporal patterns of natural selection on reproductive timing across populations in two songbird species.
Jantzen CC; Visser ME
Proc Biol Sci; 2023 Oct; 290(2009):20231474. PubMed ID: 37848060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fluctuations in population composition dampen the impact of phenotypic plasticity on trait dynamics in superb fairy-wrens.
van de Pol M; Osmond HL; Cockburn A
J Anim Ecol; 2012 Mar; 81(2):411-22. PubMed ID: 21999931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sex-Differences in Phenology: A Tinbergian Perspective.
Williams CT; Chmura HE; Deal CK; Wilsterman K
Integr Comp Biol; 2022 Oct; 62(4):980-997. PubMed ID: 35587379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tritrophic phenological match-mismatch in space and time.
Burgess MD; Smith KW; Evans KL; Leech D; Pearce-Higgins JW; Branston CJ; Briggs K; Clark JR; du Feu CR; Lewthwaite K; Nager RG; Sheldon BC; Smith JA; Whytock RC; Willis SG; Phillimore AB
Nat Ecol Evol; 2018 Jun; 2(6):970-975. PubMed ID: 29686235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Climate change and unequal phenological changes across four trophic levels: constraints or adaptations?
Both C; van Asch M; Bijlsma RG; van den Burg AB; Visser ME
J Anim Ecol; 2009 Jan; 78(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 18771506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Phenological mismatch drives selection on elevation, but not on slope, of breeding time plasticity in a wild songbird.
Ramakers JJC; Gienapp P; Visser ME
Evolution; 2019 Feb; 73(2):175-187. PubMed ID: 30556587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nonlinear effects of phenological shifts link interannual variation to species interactions.
Rudolf VHW
J Anim Ecol; 2018 Sep; 87(5):1395-1406. PubMed ID: 29749640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Experimental shifts in phenology affect fitness, foraging, and parasitism in a native solitary bee.
Farzan S; Yang LH
Ecology; 2018 Oct; 99(10):2187-2195. PubMed ID: 30066397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Phenological asynchrony: a ticking time-bomb for seemingly stable populations?
Simmonds EG; Cole EF; Sheldon BC; Coulson T
Ecol Lett; 2020 Dec; 23(12):1766-1775. PubMed ID: 32975017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mismatch between birth date and vegetation phenology slows the demography of roe deer.
Plard F; Gaillard JM; Coulson T; Hewison AJ; Delorme D; Warnant C; Bonenfant C
PLoS Biol; 2014 Apr; 12(4):e1001828. PubMed ID: 24690936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How do phenology, plasticity, and evolution determine the fitness consequences of climate change for montane butterflies?
Kingsolver JG; Buckley LB
Evol Appl; 2018 Sep; 11(8):1231-1244. PubMed ID: 30151036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detrending phenological time series improves climate-phenology analyses and reveals evidence of plasticity.
Iler AM; Inouye DW; Schmidt NM; Høye TT
Ecology; 2017 Mar; 98(3):647-655. PubMed ID: 27984645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
