These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

2148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25166120)

  • 1. Editorial: acceptance criteria and editorial procedures for Optics Letters.
    Zhang XC; Andersen PE; Justus BL; Galtarossa A
    Opt Lett; 2014 Sep; 39(17):ED2-3. PubMed ID: 25166120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Editorial: Celebration of Optics Letters' 40th Anniversary.
    Zhang XC
    Opt Lett; 2017 Jan; 42(1):ED1-ED2. PubMed ID: 28059216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Editorial: Serving the Optics and Photonics Community for 40 Years.
    Zhang XC
    Opt Lett; 2017 Jun; 42(11):ED3-ED4. PubMed ID: 28569857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Editorial: Optics Letters' 40th Anniversary Retrospective 2008-2013.
    Willner AE
    Opt Lett; 2017 Aug; 42(15):ED5. PubMed ID: 28957236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Editorial: Optics Letters Has Changed with the Times While Keeping Its Identity.
    Campillo AJ
    Opt Lett; 2017 Sep; 42(17):ED6-ED8. PubMed ID: 28957094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Expedited editorial decision in COVID-19 pandemic.
    Sun Z; Liu S; Li Y; Ma C
    J Informetr; 2023 Feb; 17(1):101382. PubMed ID: 36686337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Editorial: Optics Letters continues to thrive, will require novelty and impact statement at submission.
    Zhang XC
    Opt Lett; 2016 Apr; 41(8):ED1. PubMed ID: 27082373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences in review quality and recommendations for publication between peer reviewers suggested by authors or by editors.
    Schroter S; Tite L; Hutchings A; Black N
    JAMA; 2006 Jan; 295(3):314-7. PubMed ID: 16418467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A peek behind the curtain: peer review and editorial decision making at Stroke.
    Sposato LA; Ovbiagele B; Johnston SC; Fisher M; Saposnik G;
    Ann Neurol; 2014 Aug; 76(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 25043350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Redesign of article pages for Optics Letters: editorial.
    Zhang XC
    Opt Lett; 2015 Jun; 40(11):ED1. PubMed ID: 26030587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differences in editorial board reviewer behavior based on gender.
    Wing DA; Benner RS; Petersen R; Newcomb R; Scott JR
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2010 Oct; 19(10):1919-23. PubMed ID: 20831430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Editorial.
    Duncan M
    Opt Express; 2004 Jan; 12(1):1. PubMed ID: 19471504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The journal ombudsperson: a step toward scientific press oversight.
    Horton R
    JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):298-9. PubMed ID: 9676690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Review of Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) 2015-2016 and transition of the JCMR office to Boston.
    Manning WJ
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Dec; 19(1):108. PubMed ID: 29284487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. IJBNPA in 2016: Strategy for advancing the science of behavior change in nutrition and physical activity, and associated editorial priorities.
    Jago R; Wood L
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2016 Jul; 13():80. PubMed ID: 27396235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Editorial: 10th anniversary.
    de Sterke CM
    Opt Express; 2007 Jul; 15(14):8678-80. PubMed ID: 19547202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Editorial.
    Al-Deeb SM; Khan S
    Neurosciences (Riyadh); 2009 Jan; 14(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 21048564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Editorial: Optics Letters-40 Years and Beyond.
    Zhang XC
    Opt Lett; 2017 Dec; 42(24):ED9-ED11. PubMed ID: 29240198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Author perception of peer review: impact of review quality and acceptance on satisfaction.
    Weber EJ; Katz PP; Waeckerle JF; Callaham ML
    JAMA; 2002 Jun; 287(21):2790-3. PubMed ID: 12038913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Duration of the editorial process of the Atención Primaria journal].
    Jiménez Villa J
    Aten Primaria; 1999 May; 23 Suppl 1():29-32. PubMed ID: 10408134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 108.