These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25166628)

  • 1. Noise reduction improves memory for target language speech in competing native but not foreign language speech.
    Ng EH; Rudner M; Lunner T; Rönnberg J
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):82-91. PubMed ID: 25166628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for hearing-aid users.
    Ng EH; Rudner M; Lunner T; Pedersen MS; Rönnberg J
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jul; 52(7):433-41. PubMed ID: 23550584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do hearing loss and cognitive function modulate benefit from different binaural noise-reduction settings?
    Neher T; Grimm G; Hohmann V; Kollmeier B
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):e52-62. PubMed ID: 24351610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.
    Shehorn J; Marrone N; Muller T
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28806193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of hearing aid noise reduction on listening effort in hearing-impaired adults.
    Desjardins JL; Doherty KA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):600-10. PubMed ID: 24622352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using Speech Recall in Hearing Aid Fitting and Outcome Evaluation Under Ecological Test Conditions.
    Lunner T; Rudner M; Rosenbom T; Ågren J; Ng EH
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37 Suppl 1():145S-54S. PubMed ID: 27355764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptual consequences of different signal changes due to binaural noise reduction: do hearing loss and working memory capacity play a role?
    Neher T; Grimm G; Hohmann V
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(5):e213-27. PubMed ID: 25010636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic relation between working memory capacity and speech recognition in noise during the first 6 months of hearing aid use.
    Ng EH; Classon E; Larsby B; Arlinger S; Lunner T; Rudner M; Rönnberg J
    Trends Hear; 2014 Nov; 18():. PubMed ID: 25421088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of task difficulty, background noise and noise reduction on recall.
    Micula A; Ning Ng EH; El-Azm F; Rönnberg J
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Oct; 59(10):792-800. PubMed ID: 32564633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phonological mismatch makes aided speech recognition in noise cognitively taxing.
    Rudner M; Foo C; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):879-92. PubMed ID: 17982373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hearing aid noise suppression and working memory function.
    Neher T; Wagener KC; Fischer RL
    Int J Audiol; 2018 May; 57(5):335-344. PubMed ID: 29316819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Effects of Task Difficulty Predictability and Noise Reduction on Recall Performance and Pupil Dilation Responses.
    Micula A; Rönnberg J; Fiedler L; Wendt D; Jørgensen MC; Larsen DK; Ng EHN
    Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1668-1679. PubMed ID: 33859121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hearing aid experience and background noise affect the robust relationship between working memory and speech recognition in noise.
    Ng EHN; Rönnberg J
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Mar; 59(3):208-218. PubMed ID: 31809220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of voice quality and multi-talker babble noise on sentence processing and recall performance in school children using cochlear implant and/or hearing aids.
    Jonas Brännström K; von Lochow H; Lyberg-Åhlander V; Sahlén B
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2019 Jul; 44(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 30204510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acclimatization to hearing aids.
    Dawes P; Munro KJ; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):203-12. PubMed ID: 24351612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of transient noise reduction algorithms on speech intelligibility and ratings of hearing aid users.
    DiGiovanni JJ; Davlin EA; Nagaraj NK
    Am J Audiol; 2011 Dec; 20(2):140-50. PubMed ID: 21940982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech recognition in noise using bilateral open-fit hearing aids: the limited benefit of directional microphones and noise reduction.
    Magnusson L; Claesson A; Persson M; Tengstrand T
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jan; 52(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 22928919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of Noise and Noise Reduction on Processing Effort: A Pupillometry Study.
    Wendt D; Hietkamp RK; Lunner T
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):690-700. PubMed ID: 28640038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.