These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25166630)

  • 1. A Bayesian perspective on tinnitus pitch matching.
    McMillan GP; Thielman EJ; Wypych K; Henry JA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):687-94. PubMed ID: 25166630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The relationship between tinnitus pitch and the edge frequency of the audiogram in individuals with hearing impairment and tonal tinnitus.
    Moore BC; Vinay ; Sandhya
    Hear Res; 2010 Mar; 261(1-2):51-6. PubMed ID: 20103482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of iPod-Based Automated Tinnitus Pitch Matching.
    Wunderlich R; Stein A; Engell A; Lau P; Waasem L; Shaykevich A; Rudack C; Pantev C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Feb; 26(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 25690779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Psychoacoustic assessment to improve tinnitus diagnosis.
    Basile CÉ; Fournier P; Hutchins S; Hébert S
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e82995. PubMed ID: 24349414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of a Mobile Device for Acoustic Coordinated Reset Neuromodulation Tinnitus Therapy.
    Hauptmann C; Wegener A; Poppe H; Williams M; Popelka G; Tass PA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Oct; 27(9):720-731. PubMed ID: 27718349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of two computer-automated procedures for tinnitus pitch matching.
    Henry JA; Flick CL; Gilbert A; Ellingson RM; Fausti SA
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2001; 38(5):557-66. PubMed ID: 11732833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Choice of test stimulus matters for pitch matching performance: Comparison between pure tone and narrow band noise.
    Wollbrink A; Dobel C; Salvari V; Paraskevopoulos E; Kisker C; Mittmann K; Pantev C
    Hear Res; 2019 Sep; 381():107776. PubMed ID: 31401433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory discrimination training for tinnitus treatment: the effect of different paradigms.
    Herraiz C; Diges I; Cobo P; Aparicio JM; Toledano A
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2010 Jul; 267(7):1067-74. PubMed ID: 20044759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of tinnitus pitch matching using a web-based protocol.
    Mahboubi H; Ziai K; Brunworth J; Djalilian HR
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2012 Oct; 121(10):671-4. PubMed ID: 23130542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing Three Established Methods for Tinnitus Pitch Matching With Respect to Reliability, Matching Duration, and Subjective Satisfaction.
    Neff P; Langguth B; Schecklmann M; Hannemann R; Schlee W
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519887247. PubMed ID: 31805822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tinnitus pitch: a comparison of three measurement methods.
    Tyler RS; Conrad-Armes D
    Br J Audiol; 1983 May; 17(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 6626779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of manual and computer-automated procedures for tinnitus pitch-matching.
    Henry JA; Flick CL; Gilbert A; Ellingson RM; Fausti SA
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2004 Mar; 41(2):121-38. PubMed ID: 15558367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simultaneous measurement of tinnitus pitch and loudness.
    Penner MJ; Saran A
    Ear Hear; 1994 Dec; 15(6):416-21. PubMed ID: 7895937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Individual Reliability of the Standard Clinical Method vs Patient-Centered Tinnitus Likeness Rating for Assessment of Tinnitus Pitch and Loudness Matching.
    Hébert S
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2018 Dec; 144(12):1136-1144. PubMed ID: 30267085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Missed hearing loss in tinnitus patients with normal audiograms.
    Xiong B; Liu Z; Liu Q; Peng Y; Wu H; Lin Y; Zhao X; Sun W
    Hear Res; 2019 Dec; 384():107826. PubMed ID: 31683074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of variability among measurements of subjective tinnitus and objective stimuli.
    Burns EM
    Audiology; 1984; 23(4):426-40. PubMed ID: 6466204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing pure tone and narrow band noise to measure tonal tinnitus pitch-match frequency.
    Korth D; Wollbrink A; Lukas C; Ivansic D; Guntinas-Lichius O; Salvari V; Paraskevopoulos E; Pantev C; Dobel C
    Prog Brain Res; 2021; 262():115-137. PubMed ID: 33931175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationship between tinnitus pitch and edge of hearing loss in individuals with a narrow tinnitus bandwidth.
    Sereda M; Edmondson-Jones M; Hall DA
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Apr; 54(4):249-56. PubMed ID: 25470623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. One Step Closer towards a Reliable Tinnitus Pitch-Match Frequency Determination Using Repetitive Recursive Matching.
    Korth D; Wollbrink A; Wunderlich R; Ivansic D; Guntinas-Lichius O; Salvari V; Pantev C; Dobel C
    Audiol Neurootol; 2020; 25(4):190-199. PubMed ID: 32106112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Agreement and reliability of tinnitus loudness matching and pitch likeness rating.
    Hoare DJ; Edmondson-Jones M; Gander PE; Hall DA
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e114553. PubMed ID: 25478690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.