These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1063 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25166881)

  • 1. Instrumental variable analysis with a nonlinear exposure-outcome relationship.
    Burgess S; Davies NM; Thompson SG;
    Epidemiology; 2014 Nov; 25(6):877-85. PubMed ID: 25166881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Semiparametric methods for estimation of a nonlinear exposure-outcome relationship using instrumental variables with application to Mendelian randomization.
    Staley JR; Burgess S
    Genet Epidemiol; 2017 May; 41(4):341-352. PubMed ID: 28317167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A review of instrumental variable estimators for Mendelian randomization.
    Burgess S; Small DS; Thompson SG
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2333-2355. PubMed ID: 26282889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Violation of the Constant Genetic Effect Assumption Can Result in Biased Estimates for Non-Linear Mendelian Randomization.
    Burgess S
    Hum Hered; 2023; 88(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 37651993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Testing for non-linear causal effects using a binary genotype in a Mendelian randomization study: application to alcohol and cardiovascular traits.
    Silverwood RJ; Holmes MV; Dale CE; Lawlor DA; Whittaker JC; Smith GD; Leon DA; Palmer T; Keating BJ; Zuccolo L; Casas JP; Dudbridge F;
    Int J Epidemiol; 2014 Dec; 43(6):1781-90. PubMed ID: 25192829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mendelian randomization with a binary exposure variable: interpretation and presentation of causal estimates.
    Burgess S; Labrecque JA
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2018 Oct; 33(10):947-952. PubMed ID: 30039250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Testing concordance of instrumental variable effects in generalized linear models with application to Mendelian randomization.
    Dai JY; Chan KC; Hsu L
    Stat Med; 2014 Oct; 33(23):3986-4007. PubMed ID: 24863158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Non-linear Mendelian randomization: detection of biases using negative controls with a focus on BMI, Vitamin D and LDL cholesterol.
    Hamilton FW; Hughes DA; Spiller W; Tilling K; Davey Smith G
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2024 May; 39(5):451-465. PubMed ID: 38789826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Network Mendelian randomization: using genetic variants as instrumental variables to investigate mediation in causal pathways.
    Burgess S; Daniel RM; Butterworth AS; Thompson SG;
    Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 44(2):484-95. PubMed ID: 25150977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression.
    Bowden J; Davey Smith G; Burgess S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 44(2):512-25. PubMed ID: 26050253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian methods for instrumental variable analysis with genetic instruments ('Mendelian randomization'): example with urate transporter SLC2A9 as an instrumental variable for effect of urate levels on metabolic syndrome.
    McKeigue PM; Campbell H; Wild S; Vitart V; Hayward C; Rudan I; Wright AF; Wilson JF
    Int J Epidemiol; 2010 Jun; 39(3):907-18. PubMed ID: 20348110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of allele scores as instrumental variables for Mendelian randomization.
    Burgess S; Thompson SG
    Int J Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 42(4):1134-44. PubMed ID: 24062299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relaxing parametric assumptions for non-linear Mendelian randomization using a doubly-ranked stratification method.
    Tian H; Mason AM; Liu C; Burgess S
    PLoS Genet; 2023 Jun; 19(6):e1010823. PubMed ID: 37390109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of the instrumental inequalities in simulated mendelian randomization analyses with coarsened exposures.
    Diemer EW; Shi J; Hernan MA; Swanson SA
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2024 May; 39(5):491-499. PubMed ID: 38819552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A data-adaptive method for investigating effect heterogeneity with high-dimensional covariates in Mendelian randomization.
    Tian H; Tom BDM; Burgess S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Feb; 24(1):34. PubMed ID: 38341532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Constrained instruments and their application to Mendelian randomization with pleiotropy.
    Jiang L; Oualkacha K; Didelez V; Ciampi A; Rosa-Neto P; Benedet AL; Mathotaarachchi S; Richards JB; Greenwood CMT;
    Genet Epidemiol; 2019 Jun; 43(4):373-401. PubMed ID: 30635941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetic instrumental variable analysis: time to call mendelian randomization what it is. The example of alcohol and cardiovascular disease.
    Mukamal KJ; Stampfer MJ; Rimm EB
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2020 Feb; 35(2):93-97. PubMed ID: 31761964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mendelian randomization with incomplete measurements on the exposure in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos.
    Li Y; Wong KY; Howard AG; Gordon-Larsen P; Highland HM; Graff M; North KE; Downie CG; Avery CL; Yu B; Young KL; Buchanan VL; Kaplan R; Hou L; Joyce BT; Qi Q; Sofer T; Moon JY; Lin DY
    HGG Adv; 2024 Jan; 5(1):100245. PubMed ID: 37817410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The many weak instruments problem and Mendelian randomization.
    Davies NM; von Hinke Kessler Scholder S; Farbmacher H; Burgess S; Windmeijer F; Smith GD
    Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(3):454-68. PubMed ID: 25382280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Mendelian randomization approach, used for causal inferences].
    Wang LN; Zhang Z
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Apr; 38(4):547-552. PubMed ID: 28468080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 54.