BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

505 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25168952)

  • 1. Face gender and stereotypicality influence facial trait evaluation: Counter-stereotypical female faces are negatively evaluated.
    Sutherland CA; Young AW; Mootz CA; Oldmeadow JA
    Br J Psychol; 2015 May; 106(2):186-208. PubMed ID: 25168952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Revealing Hidden Gender Biases in Competence Impressions of Faces.
    Oh D; Buck EA; Todorov A
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Jan; 30(1):65-79. PubMed ID: 30526301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Integrating social and facial models of person perception: Converging and diverging dimensions.
    Sutherland CAM; Oldmeadow JA; Young AW
    Cognition; 2016 Dec; 157():257-267. PubMed ID: 27689511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do We See Masculine Faces as Competent and Feminine Faces as Warm? Effects of Sexual Dimorphism on Facial Perception.
    Wen F; Zuo B; Ma S; Xu Y; Coley JD; Wang Y
    Evol Psychol; 2020; 18(4):1474704920980642. PubMed ID: 33356507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Forming impressions: effects of facial expression and gender stereotypes.
    Hack T
    Psychol Rep; 2014 Apr; 114(2):557-71. PubMed ID: 24897907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of subtle facial expressions on children's first impressions of trustworthiness and dominance is not adult-like.
    Mondloch CJ; Gerada A; Proietti V; Nelson NL
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2019 Apr; 180():19-38. PubMed ID: 30611111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gender biases in impressions from faces: Empirical studies and computational models.
    Oh D; Dotsch R; Porter J; Todorov A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Feb; 149(2):323-342. PubMed ID: 31294585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Understanding facial impressions between and within identities.
    Mileva M; Young AW; Kramer RSS; Burton AM
    Cognition; 2019 Sep; 190():184-198. PubMed ID: 31102977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of Perceived Height, Masculinity, and Age on Each Other and on Perceptions of Dominance in Male Faces.
    Batres C; Re DE; Perrett DI
    Perception; 2015; 44(11):1293-309. PubMed ID: 26562897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Caring or daring? Exploring the impact of facial masculinity/femininity and gender category information on first impressions.
    Walker M; Wänke M
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0181306. PubMed ID: 29023451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Understanding trait impressions from faces.
    Sutherland CAM; Young AW
    Br J Psychol; 2022 Nov; 113(4):1056-1078. PubMed ID: 35880691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceived femininity and masculinity contribute independently to facial impressions.
    Hester N; Jones BC; Hehman E
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Jun; 150(6):1147-1164. PubMed ID: 33119352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Social inferences from faces: ambient images generate a three-dimensional model.
    Sutherland CA; Oldmeadow JA; Santos IM; Towler J; Michael Burt D; Young AW
    Cognition; 2013 Apr; 127(1):105-18. PubMed ID: 23376296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of facial occlusion on facial impressions of trustworthiness and dominance.
    Oliveira M; Garcia-Marques T
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Aug; 50(6):1131-1146. PubMed ID: 35501456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three's a crowd: Fast ensemble perception of first impressions of trustworthiness.
    Marini F; Sutherland CAM; Ostrovska B; Manassi M
    Cognition; 2023 Oct; 239():105540. PubMed ID: 37478696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Audiovisual integration in social evaluation.
    Mileva M; Tompkinson J; Watt D; Burton AM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jan; 44(1):128-138. PubMed ID: 28481565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Facial expressions of authenticity: Emotion variability increases judgments of trustworthiness and leadership.
    Slepian ML; Carr EW
    Cognition; 2019 Feb; 183():82-98. PubMed ID: 30445313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modeling first impressions from highly variable facial images.
    Vernon RJ; Sutherland CA; Young AW; Hartley T
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Aug; 111(32):E3353-61. PubMed ID: 25071197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceiver and target characteristics contribute to impression formation differently across race and gender.
    Xie SY; Flake JK; Hehman E
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Aug; 117(2):364-385. PubMed ID: 30550328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individual differences in trust evaluations are shaped mostly by environments, not genes.
    Sutherland CAM; Burton NS; Wilmer JB; Blokland GAM; Germine L; Palermo R; Collova JR; Rhodes G
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 May; 117(19):10218-10224. PubMed ID: 32341163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.