These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25170782)

  • 1. Effects of hearing loss on heart rate variability and skin conductance measured during sentence recognition in noise.
    Mackersie CL; MacPhee IX; Heldt EW
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):145-54. PubMed ID: 25170782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Subjective and psychophysiological indexes of listening effort in a competing-talker task.
    Mackersie CL; Cones H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Feb; 22(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 21463566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Autonomic Nervous System Reactivity During Speech Repetition Tasks: Heart Rate Variability and Skin Conductance.
    Mackersie CL; Calderon-Moultrie N
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37 Suppl 1():118S-25S. PubMed ID: 27355761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Grant KW; Walden TC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.
    Shehorn J; Marrone N; Muller T
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28806193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO.
    Tamati TN; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Oct; 25(9):869-92. PubMed ID: 25405842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of changing the secondary task in dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):611-22. PubMed ID: 24992491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech recognition in multitalker babble using digits, words, and sentences.
    McArdle RA; Wilson RH; Burks CA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Oct; 16(9):726-39; quiz 763-4. PubMed ID: 16515143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contributions of lexical tone to Mandarin sentence recognition in hearing-impaired listeners under noisy conditions.
    Li N; Wang S; Wang X; Xu L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Aug; 146(2):EL99. PubMed ID: 31472569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Effects of Hearing Aid Directional Microphone and Noise Reduction Processing on Listening Effort in Older Adults with Hearing Loss.
    Desjardins JL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jan; 27(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 26809324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of compression release time of a hearing aid on sentence recognition and the quality judgment of speech.
    Shetty HN; Raju S
    Noise Health; 2019; 21(103):232-241. PubMed ID: 32978360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Revised Speech Perception in Noise Test (R-SPIN) in a multiple signal-to-noise ratio paradigm.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R; Watts KL; Smith SL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Sep; 23(8):590-605. PubMed ID: 22967734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Early Sentence Recognition in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    James CJ; Karoui C; Laborde ML; Lepage B; Molinier CÉ; Tartayre M; Escudé B; Deguine O; Marx M; Fraysse B
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):905-917. PubMed ID: 30335668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response.
    Ohlenforst B; Wendt D; Kramer SE; Naylor G; Zekveld AA; Lunner T
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():90-99. PubMed ID: 29779607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Words-in-Noise Test (WIN), list 3: a practice list.
    Wilson RH; Watts KL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Feb; 23(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 22353677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of energetic and informational masking on The Words-in-Noise Test (WIN).
    Wilson RH; Trivette CP; Williams DA; Watts KL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(7):522-33. PubMed ID: 22992259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise: hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Summers V; Makashay MJ; Theodoroff SM; Leek MR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):274-92. PubMed ID: 23636209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. List equivalency of the AzBio sentence test in noise for listeners with normal-hearing sensitivity or cochlear implants.
    Schafer EC; Pogue J; Milrany T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(7):501-9. PubMed ID: 22992257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial separation benefit for unaided and aided listening.
    Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):72-85. PubMed ID: 24121648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.