261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25171881)
1. Magnetic sphincter augmentation and fundoplication for GERD in clinical practice: one-year results of a multicenter, prospective observational study.
Riegler M; Schoppman SF; Bonavina L; Ashton D; Horbach T; Kemen M
Surg Endosc; 2015 May; 29(5):1123-9. PubMed ID: 25171881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-year clinical experience with magnetic sphincter augmentation and laparoscopic fundoplication.
Bonavina L; Horbach T; Schoppmann SF; DeMarchi J
Surg Endosc; 2021 Jul; 35(7):3449-3458. PubMed ID: 32676727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative Analysis of Laparoscopic Fundoplication and Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation for the Treatment of Medically Refractory GERD.
Richards WO; McRae C
Am Surg; 2018 Nov; 84(11):1762-1767. PubMed ID: 30747630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Early results of magnetic sphincter augmentation versus fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Aiolfi A; Asti E; Bernardi D; Bonitta G; Rausa E; Siboni S; Bonavina L
Int J Surg; 2018 Apr; 52():82-88. PubMed ID: 29471155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation for Gastroesophageal Reflux at 5 Years: Final Results of a Pilot Study Show Long-Term Acid Reduction and Symptom Improvement.
Saino G; Bonavina L; Lipham JC; Dunn D; Ganz RA
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2015 Oct; 25(10):787-92. PubMed ID: 26437027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Longitudinal comparison of quality of life in patients undergoing laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication versus magnetic sphincter augmentation: Observational cohort study with propensity score analysis.
Asti E; Bonitta G; Lovece A; Lazzari V; Bonavina L
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Jul; 95(30):e4366. PubMed ID: 27472725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Paradigm shift in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Richards WO; Houston HL; Torquati A; Khaitan L; Holzman MD; Sharp KW
Ann Surg; 2003 May; 237(5):638-47; discussion 648-9. PubMed ID: 12724630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term Outcomes of Patients Receiving a Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Device for Gastroesophageal Reflux.
Ganz RA; Edmundowicz SA; Taiganides PA; Lipham JC; Smith CD; DeVault KR; Horgan S; Jacobsen G; Luketich JD; Smith CC; Schlack-Haerer SC; Kothari SN; Dunst CM; Watson TJ; Peters J; Oelschlager BK; Perry KA; Melvin S; Bemelman WA; Smout AJ; Dunn D
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 May; 14(5):671-7. PubMed ID: 26044316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laparoscopic Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation vs Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication: A Matched-Pair Analysis of 100 Patients.
Reynolds JL; Zehetner J; Wu P; Shah S; Bildzukewicz N; Lipham JC
J Am Coll Surg; 2015 Jul; 221(1):123-8. PubMed ID: 26095560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Removal of the Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Device: Surgical Technique and Results of a Single-center Cohort Study.
Asti E; Siboni S; Lazzari V; Bonitta G; Sironi A; Bonavina L
Ann Surg; 2017 May; 265(5):941-945. PubMed ID: 27163959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation versus fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: systematic review and pooled analysis.
Guidozzi N; Wiggins T; Ahmed AR; Hanna GB; Markar SR
Dis Esophagus; 2019 Nov; 32(9):. PubMed ID: 31069388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. S148: Long-term patient-reported outcomes of laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation versus Nissen fundoplication: a 5-year follow-up study.
O'Neill SM; Jalilvand AD; Colvin JS; Haisley KR; Perry KA
Surg Endosc; 2022 Sep; 36(9):6851-6858. PubMed ID: 35041056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multi-institutional outcomes using magnetic sphincter augmentation versus Nissen fundoplication for chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Warren HF; Reynolds JL; Lipham JC; Zehetner J; Bildzukewicz NA; Taiganides PA; Mickley J; Aye RW; Farivar AS; Louie BE
Surg Endosc; 2016 Aug; 30(8):3289-96. PubMed ID: 26541740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. LINX
Skubleny D; Switzer NJ; Dang J; Gill RS; Shi X; de Gara C; Birch DW; Wong C; Hutter MM; Karmali S
Surg Endosc; 2017 Aug; 31(8):3078-3084. PubMed ID: 27981382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Favorable results from a prospective evaluation of 200 patients with large hiatal hernias undergoing LINX magnetic sphincter augmentation.
Buckley FP; Bell RCW; Freeman K; Doggett S; Heidrick R
Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1762-1768. PubMed ID: 28936790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Surgery of the hiatal hernia and gastroesophageal reflux dinase, Nissen or Toupet?].
Kasalický M; Koblihová E
Rozhl Chir; 2015 Dec; 94(12):510-5. PubMed ID: 26767901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. One hundred consecutive patients treated with magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease: 6 years of clinical experience from a single center.
Bonavina L; Saino G; Bona D; Sironi A; Lazzari V
J Am Coll Surg; 2013 Oct; 217(4):577-85. PubMed ID: 23856355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The relationship between gastroesophageal junction integrity and symptomatic fundoplication outcomes.
Turner B; Helm M; Hetzel E; Schumm M; Gould JC
Surg Endosc; 2020 Mar; 34(3):1387-1392. PubMed ID: 31214803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Esophageal Penetration of the Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Device: History Repeats Itself.
Salvador R; Costantini M; Capovilla G; Polese L; Merigliano S
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2017 Aug; 27(8):834-838. PubMed ID: 28586287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative outcomes of Toupet fundoplication and magnetic sphincter augmentation.
Asti E; Milito P; Froiio C; Milani V; Bonavina L
Dis Esophagus; 2023 Jun; 36(Supplement_1):. PubMed ID: 36544397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
