These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25172412)

  • 1. Comparison of a stationary digital breast tomosynthesis system to magnified 2D mammography using breast tissue specimens.
    Tucker AW; Calliste J; Gidcumb EM; Wu J; Kuzmiak CM; Hyun N; Zeng D; Lu J; Zhou O; Lee YZ
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Dec; 21(12):1547-52. PubMed ID: 25172412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
    Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): initial experience in a clinical setting.
    Skaane P; Gullien R; Bjørndal H; Eben EB; Ekseth U; Haakenaasen U; Jahr G; Jebsen IN; Krager M
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Jun; 53(5):524-9. PubMed ID: 22593120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visualizing microcalcifications in lumpectomy specimens: an exploration into the clinical potential of carbon nanotube-enabled
    Puett C; Gao J; Tucker A; Inscoe CR; Hwang M; Kuzmiak CM; Lu J; Zhou O; Lee YZ
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2019 Jul; 5(4):. PubMed ID: 33304617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of visibility of circumscribed masses on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) and 2D mammography: are circumscribed masses better visualized and assured of being benign on DBT?
    Nakashima K; Uematsu T; Itoh T; Takahashi K; Nishimura S; Hayashi T; Sugino T
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):570-577. PubMed ID: 27236817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Slab Thickness: Impact on Reader Performance and Interpretation Time.
    Pujara AC; Joe AI; Patterson SK; Neal CH; Noroozian M; Ma T; Chan HP; Helvie MA; Maturen KE
    Radiology; 2020 Dec; 297(3):534-542. PubMed ID: 33021891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images.
    Skaane P; Bandos AI; Eben EB; Jebsen IN; Krager M; Haakenaasen U; Ekseth U; Izadi M; Hofvind S; Gullien R
    Radiology; 2014 Jun; 271(3):655-63. PubMed ID: 24484063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital breast tomosynthesis is comparable to mammographic spot views for mass characterization.
    Noroozian M; Hadjiiski L; Rahnama-Moghadam S; Klein KA; Jeffries DO; Pinsky RW; Chan HP; Carson PL; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA
    Radiology; 2012 Jan; 262(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 21998048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transfer Learning From Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Diagnosis: A Comparison of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography.
    Mendel K; Li H; Sheth D; Giger M
    Acad Radiol; 2019 Jun; 26(6):735-743. PubMed ID: 30076083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: integration of image modalities enhances deep learning-based breast mass classification.
    Li X; Qin G; He Q; Sun L; Zeng H; He Z; Chen W; Zhen X; Zhou L
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):778-788. PubMed ID: 31691121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of percentage breast tissue density: comparison between digital mammography (2D full field digital mammography) and digital breast tomosynthesis according to different BI-RADS categories.
    Tagliafico AS; Tagliafico G; Cavagnetto F; Calabrese M; Houssami N
    Br J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 86(1031):20130255. PubMed ID: 24029631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Initial Clinical Experience with Stationary Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Lee YZ; Puett C; Inscoe CR; Jia B; Kim C; Walsh R; Yoon S; Kim SJ; Kuzmiak CM; Zeng D; Lu J; Zhou O
    Acad Radiol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):1363-1372. PubMed ID: 30660473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dose reduction in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) screening using synthetically reconstructed projection images: an observer performance study.
    Gur D; Zuley ML; Anello MI; Rathfon GY; Chough DM; Ganott MA; Hakim CM; Wallace L; Lu A; Bandos AI
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Feb; 19(2):166-71. PubMed ID: 22098941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Synthesized Digital Mammography Imaging.
    Freer PE; Winkler N
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2017 May; 55(3):503-512. PubMed ID: 28411676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical performance metrics of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis compared with 2D digital mammography for breast cancer screening in community practice.
    Greenberg JS; Javitt MC; Katzen J; Michael S; Holland AE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):687-93. PubMed ID: 24918774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of a variable dose acquisition technique for microcalcification and mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Das M; Gifford HC; O'Connor JM; Glick SJ
    Med Phys; 2009 Jun; 36(6):1976-84. PubMed ID: 19610286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two-view and single-view tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: high-resolution X-ray imaging observer study.
    Wallis MG; Moa E; Zanca F; Leifland K; Danielsson M
    Radiology; 2012 Mar; 262(3):788-96. PubMed ID: 22274840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Combination of one-view digital breast tomosynthesis with one-view digital mammography versus standard two-view digital mammography: per lesion analysis.
    Gennaro G; Hendrick RE; Toledano A; Paquelet JR; Bezzon E; Chersevani R; di Maggio C; La Grassa M; Pescarini L; Polico I; Proietti A; Baldan E; Pomerri F; Muzzio PC
    Eur Radiol; 2013 Aug; 23(8):2087-94. PubMed ID: 23620367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital breast tomosynthesis as an adjunct to digital mammography for detecting and characterising invasive lobular cancers: a multi-reader study.
    Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Zuiani C; Martincich L; Londero V; Caramia E; Clauser P; Campanino PP; Regini E; Luparia A; Castellano I; Bergamasco L; Sapino A; Fonio P; Bazzocchi M; Gandini G
    Clin Radiol; 2016 Sep; 71(9):889-95. PubMed ID: 27210245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the Detection Rate of Simulated Microcalcifications in Full-Field Digital Mammography, Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, and Synthetically Reconstructed 2-Dimensional Images Performed With 2 Different Digital X-ray Mammography Systems.
    Peters S; Hellmich M; Stork A; Kemper J; Grinstein O; Püsken M; Stahlhut L; Kinner S; Maintz D; Krug KB
    Invest Radiol; 2017 Apr; 52(4):206-215. PubMed ID: 27861206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.