These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25172412)

  • 21. Performance of Photon-Counting Breast Computed Tomography, Digital Mammography, and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Evaluating Breast Specimens.
    Rößler AC; Kalender W; Kolditz D; Steiding C; Ruth V; Preuss C; Peter SC; Brehm B; Hammon M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Wenkel E
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):184-190. PubMed ID: 27888024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
    Shaheen E; Van Ongeval C; Zanca F; Cockmartin L; Marshall N; Jacobs J; Young KC; R Dance D; Bosmans H
    Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6659-71. PubMed ID: 22149848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Can digital breast tomosynthesis perform better than standard digital mammography work-up in breast cancer assessment clinic?
    Mall S; Noakes J; Kossoff M; Lee W; McKessar M; Goy A; Duncombe J; Roberts M; Giuffre B; Miller A; Bhola N; Kapoor C; Shearman C; DaCosta G; Choi S; Sterba J; Kay M; Bruderlin K; Winarta N; Donohue K; Macdonell-Scott B; Klijnsma F; Suzuki K; Brennan P; Mello-Thoms C
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Dec; 28(12):5182-5194. PubMed ID: 29846804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of performance metrics with digital 2D versus tomosynthesis mammography in the diagnostic setting.
    Bahl M; Mercaldo S; Vijapura CA; McCarthy AM; Lehman CD
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):477-484. PubMed ID: 29967957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Impact of the Addition of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) to Standard 2D Digital Screening Mammography on the Rates of Patient Recall, Cancer Detection, and Recommendations for Short-term Follow-up.
    Powell JL; Hawley JR; Lipari AM; Yildiz VO; Erdal BS; Carkaci S
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Mar; 24(3):302-307. PubMed ID: 27919540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography-Which modality provides more accurate prediction of margin status in specimen radiography?
    Amer HA; Schmitzberger F; Ingold-Heppner B; Kussmaul J; El Tohamy MF; Tantawy HI; Hamm B; Makowski M; Fallenberg EM
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 93():258-264. PubMed ID: 28668424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced digital mammography in breast cancer detection in comparison to tomosynthesis, synthetic 2D mammography and tomosynthesis combined with ultrasound in women with dense breast.
    Sudhir R; Sannapareddy K; Potlapalli A; Krishnamurthy PB; Buddha S; Koppula V
    Br J Radiol; 2021 Feb; 94(1118):20201046. PubMed ID: 33242249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Can digital breast tomosynthesis replace conventional diagnostic mammography views for screening recalls without calcifications? A comparison study in a simulated clinical setting.
    Brandt KR; Craig DA; Hoskins TL; Henrichsen TL; Bendel EC; Brandt SR; Mandrekar J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Feb; 200(2):291-8. PubMed ID: 23345348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Can the synthetic C view images be used in isolation for diagnosing breast malignancy without reviewing the entire digital breast tomosynthesis data set?
    Murphy MC; Coffey L; O'Neill AC; Quinn C; Prichard R; McNally S
    Ir J Med Sci; 2018 Nov; 187(4):1077-1081. PubMed ID: 29427198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Impact of prior mammograms on combined reading of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Kim WH; Chang JM; Koo HR; Seo M; Bae MS; Lee J; Moon WK
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):148-155. PubMed ID: 27178032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison between two-dimensional synthetic mammography reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography for the detection of T1 breast cancer.
    Choi JS; Han BK; Ko EY; Ko ES; Hahn SY; Shin JH; Kim MJ
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Aug; 26(8):2538-46. PubMed ID: 26628063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Screening Mammography Findings From One Standard Projection Only in the Era of Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Cohen EO; Tso HH; Phalak KA; Mayo RC; Leung JWT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Aug; 211(2):445-451. PubMed ID: 29792742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the detection of architectural distortion.
    Dibble EH; Lourenco AP; Baird GL; Ward RC; Maynard AS; Mainiero MB
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Jan; 28(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 28710582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Synthesizing mammogram from digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Wei J; Chan HP; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Neal CH; Lu Y; Hadjiiski LM; Zhou C
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Feb; 64(4):045011. PubMed ID: 30625429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Outcome of Architectural Distortion Detected Only at Breast Tomosynthesis versus 2D Mammography.
    Alshafeiy TI; Nguyen JV; Rochman CM; Nicholson BT; Patrie JT; Harvey JA
    Radiology; 2018 Jul; 288(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 29584593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Optimized signal of calcifications in wide-angle digital breast tomosynthesis: a virtual imaging trial.
    Vancoillie L; Cockmartin L; Lueck F; Marshall N; Keupers M; Nanke R; Kappler S; Van Ongeval C; Bosmans H
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Oct; 34(10):6309-6319. PubMed ID: 38546790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Initial clinical experience with contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Chen SC; Carton AK; Albert M; Conant EF; Schnall MD; Maidment AD
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Feb; 14(2):229-38. PubMed ID: 17236995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Digital breast tomosynthesis-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: initial experiences and comparison with prone stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy.
    Schrading S; Distelmaier M; Dirrichs T; Detering S; Brolund L; Strobel K; Kuhl CK
    Radiology; 2015 Mar; 274(3):654-62. PubMed ID: 25386875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Characterization of masses in digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of machine learning in projection views and reconstructed slices.
    Chan HP; Wu YT; Sahiner B; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhang Y; Moore RH; Kopans DB; Hadjiiski L; Way T
    Med Phys; 2010 Jul; 37(7):3576-86. PubMed ID: 20831065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis compared with coned compression magnification mammography in the assessment of abnormalities found on mammography.
    Morel JC; Iqbal A; Wasan RK; Peacock C; Evans DR; Rahim R; Goligher J; Michell MJ
    Clin Radiol; 2014 Nov; 69(11):1112-6. PubMed ID: 25100302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.