These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25172412)

  • 41. Comparing recall rates following implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis to synthetic 2D images and digital mammography on women with breast-conserving surgery.
    Yoon JH; Kim EK; Kim GR; Han K; Kim MJ; Park VY; Moon HJ
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6072-6079. PubMed ID: 32529566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories.
    Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Fasciano M; Tagliafico A; Bosco D; Casella C; Bogetti C; Bergamasco L; Fonio P; Gandini G
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 166(3):765-773. PubMed ID: 28819781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Lesion detectability in 2D-mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis using different targets and observers.
    Elangovan P; Mackenzie A; Dance DR; Young KC; Wells K
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 May; 63(9):095014. PubMed ID: 29637906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Quantitative analysis of radiation dosage and image quality between digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) with two-dimensional synthetic mammography and full-field digital mammography (FFDM).
    Choi Y; Woo OH; Shin HS; Cho KR; Seo BK; Choi GY
    Clin Imaging; 2019; 55():12-17. PubMed ID: 30703693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Evaluation of reconstruction algorithms for a stationary digital breast tomosynthesis system using a carbon nanotube X-ray source array.
    Hu Z; Chen Z; Zhou C; Hong X; Chen J; Zhang Q; Jiang C; Ge Y; Yang Y; Liu X; Zheng H; Li Z; Liang D
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2020; 28(6):1157-1169. PubMed ID: 32925159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography using a hybrid performance test.
    Cockmartin L; Marshall NW; Van Ongeval C; Aerts G; Stalmans D; Zanca F; Shaheen E; De Keyzer F; Dance DR; Young KC; Bosmans H
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 May; 60(10):3939-58. PubMed ID: 25909596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Recall Rate Reduction with Tomosynthesis During Baseline Screening Examinations: An Assessment From a Prospective Trial.
    Sumkin JH; Ganott MA; Chough DM; Catullo VJ; Zuley ML; Shinde DD; Hakim CM; Bandos AI; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Dec; 22(12):1477-82. PubMed ID: 26391857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Virtual clinical trial to compare cancer detection using combinations of 2D mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis and synthetic 2D imaging.
    Mackenzie A; Thomson EL; Mitchell M; Elangovan P; van Ongeval C; Cockmartin L; Warren LM; Wilkinson LS; Wallis MG; Given-Wilson RM; Dance DR; Young KC
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Feb; 32(2):806-814. PubMed ID: 34331118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis with a wide scan angle compared to full-field digital mammography for the detection and characterization of microcalcifications.
    Clauser P; Nagl G; Helbich TH; Pinker-Domenig K; Weber M; Kapetas P; Bernathova M; Baltzer PAT
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Dec; 85(12):2161-2168. PubMed ID: 27842661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Comparison of full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis on assessment of the lesions in dense breast: a preliminary study].
    Li Y; Ye ZX; Wu T; An YH; Liu PF; Bao RX
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2013 Jan; 35(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 23648297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The effect of system geometry and dose on the threshold detectable calcification diameter in 2D-mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Hadjipanteli A; Elangovan P; Mackenzie A; Looney PT; Wells K; Dance DR; Young KC
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Feb; 62(3):858-877. PubMed ID: 28072582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A New Diagnostic Method for Mass-Like Lesions in Dense Breasts.
    Bian T; Lin Q; Cui C; Li L; Qi C; Fei J; Su X
    Breast J; 2016 Sep; 22(5):535-40. PubMed ID: 27296324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Microcalcifications Detected at Screening Mammography: Synthetic Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis versus Digital Mammography.
    Lai YC; Ray KM; Lee AY; Hayward JH; Freimanis RI; Lobach IV; Joe BN
    Radiology; 2018 Dec; 289(3):630-638. PubMed ID: 30277445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Digital breast Tomosynthesis vacuum assisted biopsy for Tomosynthesis-detected Sonographically occult lesions.
    Ariaratnam NS; Little ST; Whitley MA; Ferguson K
    Clin Imaging; 2018; 47():4-8. PubMed ID: 28806573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: a 3D approach.
    Sahiner B; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Wei J; Zhou C; Lu Y
    Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):28-39. PubMed ID: 22225272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Fully Automated Quantitative Estimation of Volumetric Breast Density from Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images: Preliminary Results and Comparison with Digital Mammography and MR Imaging.
    Pertuz S; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Radiology; 2016 Apr; 279(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 26491909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Replacing single-view mediolateral oblique (MLO) digital mammography (DM) with synthesized mammography (SM) with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images: Comparison of the diagnostic performance and radiation dose with two-view DM with or without MLO-DBT.
    Kang HJ; Chang JM; Lee J; Song SE; Shin SU; Kim WH; Bae MS; Moon WK
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Nov; 85(11):2042-2048. PubMed ID: 27776658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The threshold detectable mass diameter for 2D-mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Hadjipanteli A; Elangovan P; Mackenzie A; Wells K; Dance DR; Young KC
    Phys Med; 2019 Jan; 57():25-32. PubMed ID: 30738528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography for benign and malignant lesions in breasts: a meta-analysis.
    Lei J; Yang P; Zhang L; Wang Y; Yang K
    Eur Radiol; 2014 Mar; 24(3):595-602. PubMed ID: 24121712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. How Does the Display Luminance Level Affect Detectability of Breast Microcalcifications and Spiculated Lesions in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) Images?
    Ferranti C; Primolevo A; Cartia F; Cavatorta C; Ciniselli CM; Lualdi M; Meroni S; Pignoli E; Plebani M; Siciliano C; Verderio P; Scaperrotta G
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):795-801. PubMed ID: 28189505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.