267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25172959)
21. Outcrossing, mitotic recombination, and life-history trade-offs shape genome evolution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Magwene PM; Kayıkçı Ö; Granek JA; Reininga JM; Scholl Z; Murray D
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Feb; 108(5):1987-92. PubMed ID: 21245305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Haploids adapt faster than diploids across a range of environments.
Gerstein AC; Cleathero LA; Mandegar MA; Otto SP
J Evol Biol; 2011 Mar; 24(3):531-40. PubMed ID: 21159002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The genomic landscape of compensatory evolution.
Szamecz B; Boross G; Kalapis D; Kovács K; Fekete G; Farkas Z; Lázár V; Hrtyan M; Kemmeren P; Groot Koerkamp MJ; Rutkai E; Holstege FC; Papp B; Pál C
PLoS Biol; 2014 Aug; 12(8):e1001935. PubMed ID: 25157590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Sex drives intracellular conflict in yeast.
Harrison E; MacLean RC; Koufopanou V; Burt A
J Evol Biol; 2014 Aug; 27(8):1757-63. PubMed ID: 24825743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Adaptive genome duplication affects patterns of molecular evolution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Fisher KJ; Buskirk SW; Vignogna RC; Marad DA; Lang GI
PLoS Genet; 2018 May; 14(5):e1007396. PubMed ID: 29799840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The underlying structure of adaptation under strong selection in 12 experimental yeast populations.
Kohn LM; Anderson JB
Eukaryot Cell; 2014 Sep; 13(9):1200-6. PubMed ID: 25016004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The dynamics of diverse segmental amplifications in populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae adapting to strong selection.
Payen C; Di Rienzi SC; Ong GT; Pogachar JL; Sanchez JC; Sunshine AB; Raghuraman MK; Brewer BJ; Dunham MJ
G3 (Bethesda); 2014 Mar; 4(3):399-409. PubMed ID: 24368781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Overdominant and partially dominant mutations drive clonal adaptation in diploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Aggeli D; Marad DA; Liu X; Buskirk SW; Levy SF; Lang GI
Genetics; 2022 May; 221(2):. PubMed ID: 35435209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. What drives parallel evolution?: How population size and mutational variation contribute to repeated evolution.
Bailey SF; Blanquart F; Bataillon T; Kassen R
Bioessays; 2017 Jan; 39(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 27859467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Differential paralog divergence modulates genome evolution across yeast species.
Sanchez MR; Miller AW; Liachko I; Sunshine AB; Lynch B; Huang M; Alcantara E; DeSevo CG; Pai DA; Tucker CM; Hoang ML; Dunham MJ
PLoS Genet; 2017 Feb; 13(2):e1006585. PubMed ID: 28196070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Experimental evolution reveals natural selection on standing genetic variation.
Teotónio H; Chelo IM; Bradić M; Rose MR; Long AD
Nat Genet; 2009 Feb; 41(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 19136954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Molecular specificity, convergence and constraint shape adaptive evolution in nutrient-poor environments.
Hong J; Gresham D
PLoS Genet; 2014 Jan; 10(1):e1004041. PubMed ID: 24415948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Structure of evolving populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: adaptive changes are frequently associated with sequence alterations involving mobile elements belonging to the Ty family.
Adams J; Oeller PW
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1986 Sep; 83(18):7124-7. PubMed ID: 3018758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cryptic fitness advantage: diploids invade haploid populations despite lacking any apparent advantage as measured by standard fitness assays.
Gerstein AC; Otto SP
PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e26599. PubMed ID: 22174734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Diploidy and the selective advantage for sexual reproduction in unicellular organisms.
Kleiman M; Tannenbaum E
Theory Biosci; 2009 Nov; 128(4):249-85. PubMed ID: 19902285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The fates of mutant lineages and the distribution of fitness effects of beneficial mutations in laboratory budding yeast populations.
Frenkel EM; Good BH; Desai MM
Genetics; 2014 Apr; 196(4):1217-26. PubMed ID: 24514901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Clear: Composition of Likelihoods for Evolve and Resequence Experiments.
Iranmehr A; Akbari A; Schlötterer C; Bafna V
Genetics; 2017 Jun; 206(2):1011-1023. PubMed ID: 28396506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Budding yeast as a model organism for population genetics.
Zeyl C
Yeast; 2000 Jun; 16(8):773-84. PubMed ID: 10861902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Whole-genome comparison reveals novel genetic elements that characterize the genome of industrial strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Borneman AR; Desany BA; Riches D; Affourtit JP; Forgan AH; Pretorius IS; Egholm M; Chambers PJ
PLoS Genet; 2011 Feb; 7(2):e1001287. PubMed ID: 21304888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Microbial evolution. Global epistasis makes adaptation predictable despite sequence-level stochasticity.
Kryazhimskiy S; Rice DP; Jerison ER; Desai MM
Science; 2014 Jun; 344(6191):1519-1522. PubMed ID: 24970088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
