164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25174701)
1. Overview of the methods available for biomechanical testing of the uterine cervix in vivo.
Hee L
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Dec; 93(12):1219-37. PubMed ID: 25174701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of the in vivo biomechanical properties of the human uterine cervix in pregnancy using the aspiration test: a feasibility study.
Bauer M; Mazza E; Jabareen M; Sultan L; Bajka M; Lang U; Zimmermann R; Holzapfel GA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 May; 144 Suppl 1():S77-81. PubMed ID: 19285777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cervical ripening and insufficiency: from biochemical and molecular studies to in vivo clinical examination.
Schlembach D; Mackay L; Shi L; Maner WL; Garfield RE; Maul H
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 May; 144 Suppl 1():S70-6. PubMed ID: 19303692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transvaginal sonographic examination of the cervix in asymptomatic pregnant women: review of the literature.
Rozenberg P; Gillet A; Ville Y
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Mar; 19(3):302-11. PubMed ID: 11896957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative sonoelastography of the uterine cervix prior to induction of labor as a predictor of cervical dilation time.
Hee L; Rasmussen CK; Schlütter JM; Sandager P; Uldbjerg N
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Jul; 93(7):684-90. PubMed ID: 24702544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of duration of labor based on biomechanical measurements of the cervix: A preliminary study.
Salaets E; Richter J
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Jan; 244():25-30. PubMed ID: 31731020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Imaging analysis of cervical elastography for prediction of successful induction of labor at term.
Hwang HS; Sohn IS; Kwon HS
J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Jun; 32(6):937-46. PubMed ID: 23716514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vivo assessment of the biomechanical properties of the uterine cervix in pregnancy.
Mazza E; Parra-Saavedra M; Bajka M; Gratacos E; Nicolaides K; Deprest J
Prenat Diagn; 2014 Jan; 34(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 24155152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Transvaginal ultrasound assessment of the cervix and digital examination before labor induction].
Gomes F; Ramalho C; Machado AP; Calado E; Cardoso F; Montenegro N
Acta Med Port; 2006; 19(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 17187711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preterm labour. Cervical function and prematurity.
Norman JE
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Oct; 21(5):791-806. PubMed ID: 17490914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative sonoelastography of the uterine cervix by interposition of a synthetic reference material.
Hee L; Sandager P; Petersen O; Uldbjerg N
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Nov; 92(11):1244-9. PubMed ID: 24032689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bishop score and ultrasound assessment of the cervix for prediction of time to onset of labor and time to delivery in prolonged pregnancy.
Strobel E; Sladkevicius P; Rovas L; De Smet F; Karlsson ED; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 28(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 16817173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sonoelastography of the uterine cervix as a new diagnostic tool of cervical assessment in pregnant women - preliminary report.
Fuchs T; Woytoń R; Pomorski M; Wiatrowski A; Slejman N; Tomiałowicz M; Florjański J; Milnerowicz-Nabzdyk E; Zimmer M
Ginekol Pol; 2013 Jan; 84(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 23488304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cervical ripening with a Foley catheter: the role of pre- and postripening ultrasound examination of the cervix.
Cromi A; Ghezzi F; Tomera S; Scandroglio S; Colombo G; Bolis P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jan; 196(1):41.e1-7. PubMed ID: 17240227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does chondroitin sulfate defend the human uterine cervix against ripening in threatened premature labor?
Obara M; Hirano H; Ogawa M; Tsubaki H; Yoshida Y; Miyauchi S; Tanaka T
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Feb; 182(2):334-9. PubMed ID: 10694333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Elastography of the uterine cervix: implications for success of induction of labor.
Swiatkowska-Freund M; Preis K
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jul; 38(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 21484905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Identification of biomechanical properties in vivo in human uterine cervix.
Liao D; Hee L; Sandager P; Uldbjerg N; Gregersen H
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Nov; 39():27-37. PubMed ID: 25084120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of uterine EMG and cervical LIF in monitoring pregnant patients.
Garfield RE; Maner WL; Maul H; Saade GR
BJOG; 2005 Mar; 112 Suppl 1():103-8. PubMed ID: 15715606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical elastography during pregnancy: a critical review of current approaches with a focus on controversies and limitations.
Fruscalzo A; Mazza E; Feltovich H; Schmitz R
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2016 Oct; 43(4):493-504. PubMed ID: 27259500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional ultrasound assessment of the cervix for predicting time to spontaneous onset of labor and time to delivery in prolonged pregnancy.
Rovas L; Sladkevicius P; Strobel E; De Smet F; De Moor B; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 28(3):306-11. PubMed ID: 16817172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
