159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25175057)
1. Wear and creep behavior of total knee implants undergoing wear testing.
Teeter MG; Parikh A; Taylor M; Sprague J; Naudie DD
J Arthroplasty; 2015 Jan; 30(1):130-4. PubMed ID: 25175057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Third-body abrasive wear of tibial polyethylene inserts combined with metallic and ceramic femoral components in a knee simulator study.
Zietz C; Bergschmidt P; Lange R; Mittelmeier W; Bader R
Int J Artif Organs; 2013 Jan; 36(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 23335379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro quantification of wear in tibial inserts using microcomputed tomography.
Teeter MG; Naudie DD; McErlain DD; Brandt JM; Yuan X; Macdonald SJ; Holdsworth DW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2011 Jan; 469(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 20676810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measurements of surface and subsurface damage in retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts of a contemporary design.
Teeter MG; Brandt JM; Naudie DD; Bohm ER; McCalden RW; Holdsworth DW
J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2012; 22(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 23016787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of articular and backside polyethylene wear in mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacement.
Teeter MG; Howard JL; McCalden RW; Naudie DD
Knee; 2017 Mar; 24(2):429-433. PubMed ID: 28189405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Metrology to quantify wear and creep of polyethylene tibial knee inserts.
Muratoglu OK; Perinchief RS; Bragdon CR; O'Connor DO; Konrad R; Harris WH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 May; (410):155-64. PubMed ID: 12771826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Research progress of polyethylene inserts wear measurement and evaluation in total knee arthroplasty].
Zhao F; Wang C; Fan Y
Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2015 Jan; 39(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 26027291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tibial interface wear in retrieved total knee components and correlations with modular insert motion.
Rao AR; Engh GA; Collier MB; Lounici S
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Oct; 84(10):1849-55. PubMed ID: 12377918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of backside wear from the analysis of 55 retrieved tibial inserts.
Li S; Scuderi G; Furman BD; Bhattacharyya S; Schmieg JJ; Insall JN
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2002 Nov; (404):75-82. PubMed ID: 12439241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Total Articular Knee Replacement Using Polyurethane.
Pritchett JW
J Knee Surg; 2020 Mar; 33(3):242-246. PubMed ID: 30716773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contribution of Surface Polishing and Sterilization Method to Backside Wear in Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Teeter MG; Lanting BA; Shrestha KR; Howard JL; Vasarhelyi EM
J Arthroplasty; 2015 Dec; 30(12):2320-2. PubMed ID: 26182981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can Sequentially-irradiated and Annealed Highly Cross-linked Polyethylene Inserts Thinner than Eight-millimeters Be Utilized in Total Knee Arthroplasty?
Sayeed SA; Jauregui JJ; Korduba LA; Essner A; Harwin SF; Delanois RE; Mont MA
Surg Technol Int; 2015 May; 26():329-35. PubMed ID: 26055028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surface Damage Is Not Reduced With Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Tibial Inserts at Short-term.
Liu T; Esposito C; Elpers M; Wright T
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Jan; 474(1):107-16. PubMed ID: 26084848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can microcomputed tomography measure retrieved polyethylene wear? Comparing fixed-bearing and rotating-platform knees.
Engh CA; Zimmerman RL; Hopper RH; Engh GA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Jan; 471(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 22879092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Peripheral snap-fit locking mechanisms and smooth surface finish of tibial trays reduce backside wear in fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty.
Łapaj Ł; Mróz A; Kokoszka P; Markuszewski J; Wendland J; Helak-Łapaj C; Kruczyński J
Acta Orthop; 2017 Feb; 88(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 27781667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Oxidized zirconium femoral components reduce polyethylene wear in a knee wear simulator.
Ezzet KA; Hermida JC; Colwell CW; D'Lima DD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2004 Nov; (428):120-4. PubMed ID: 15534531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Technique to quantify subsurface cracks in retrieved polyethylene components using micro-CT.
Teeter MG; Yuan X; Naudie DD; Holdsworth DW
J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2010; 20(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 21284585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Backside wear of polyethylene tibial inserts: mechanism and magnitude of material loss.
Conditt MA; Thompson MT; Usrey MM; Ismaily SK; Noble PC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2005 Feb; 87(2):326-31. PubMed ID: 15687155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of in vitro wear of machined and molded UHMWPE tibial inserts on TKR kinematics.
Benson LC; DesJardins JD; LaBerge M
J Biomed Mater Res; 2001; 58(5):496-504. PubMed ID: 11505423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ceramic versus cobalt-chrome femoral components; wear of polyethylene insert in total knee prosthesis.
Oonishi H; Ueno M; Kim SC; Oonishi H; Iwamoto M; Kyomoto M
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Apr; 24(3):374-82. PubMed ID: 18524533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
