413 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25175326)
1. The Middle East as a weapons of mass destruction-free zone.
Dhanapala J
Med Confl Surviv; 2014 Aug; 30 Suppl 1():s18-26. PubMed ID: 25175326
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The efforts of WHO and Pugwash to eliminate chemical and biological weapons--a memoir.
Kaplan MM
Bull World Health Organ; 1999; 77(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 10083714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Military alliances offer no nuclear security.
Lalanne D; Nicholls P; Rotblat J
Nature; 2005 Feb; 433(7026):571. PubMed ID: 15703719
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Envisioning worldwide disarmament.
Turner S
Public Health Rep; 2001; 116 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):104-7. PubMed ID: 11880681
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. US bungled investigation into weapons research in Iraq.
Giles J; Brumfiel G
Nature; 2005 May; 435(7038):5. PubMed ID: 15874983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Preventing deliberate disease.
Pearson GS
Med Confl Surviv; 2000; 16(1):42-59. PubMed ID: 10824522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Work on 'non-lethal' weapons should be limited too.
Amir Singh J
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6928):113. PubMed ID: 12634754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Defense Threat Reduction Agency: a note on the United States' approach to the threat of chemical and biological warfare.
Linkie M
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2000; 16(2):531-63. PubMed ID: 10970184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. International mechanisms for threat reduction of chemical and biological weapons. Steps the United States needs to take to strengthen current global initiatives.
Smithson AE
IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2002; 21(5):116-20. PubMed ID: 12405065
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Weapons of mass destruction--threats and responses.
Gosden C; Gardener D
BMJ; 2005 Aug; 331(7513):397-400. PubMed ID: 16096310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk of deliberately induced anthrax outbreak.
Holdstock D
Lancet; 2002 Feb; 359(9305):532. PubMed ID: 11853840
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Experts blast US decision to back nuclear bunker-busters.
Brumfiel G
Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):469. PubMed ID: 12774083
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Verification of the biological weapons convention: what is needed?
Meier O
Med Confl Surviv; 2002; 18(2):175-93. PubMed ID: 12044026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Public health response to biological and chemical weapons: WHO guidance.
World Health Organization
Biosecur Bioterror; 2005; 3(3):268-9. PubMed ID: 16181049
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Allies will expose Iraq's weapons, says Blix.
Butler D
Nature; 2003 Apr; 422(6932):550. PubMed ID: 12686963
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Scholarly research on nuclear exits: the role of civil society.
Rublee MR
Med Confl Surviv; 2014 Aug; 30 Suppl 1():s35-45. PubMed ID: 25175329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Initial inventory negotiations between the IAEA and the Republic of South Africa, 1991: personal reflections on a nuclear exit.
Rautjärvi J
Med Confl Surviv; 2014 Aug; 30 Suppl 1():s10-7. PubMed ID: 25175325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Closing loopholes in the Biological Weapons Convention.
van Aken J; Hammond E
Med Confl Surviv; 2002; 18(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 12044027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Chemical weapons agency shifts focus.
Cressey D
Nature; 2008 Apr; 452(7188):671. PubMed ID: 18401365
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. My Journey before and after the birth of the Treaty for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons.
Kibet K
Med Confl Surviv; 2018 Dec; 34(4):247-252. PubMed ID: 31035792
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
