BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

61 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25175617)

  • 1. Cost-utility analysis of the cochlear implant.
    Lee HY; Kim HN; Kim HJ; Choi JY; Park EC
    J Prev Med Public Health; 2004 Nov; 37(4):353-8. PubMed ID: 25175617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-utility analysis of cochlear implants in Korea using different measures of utility.
    Lee HY; Park EC; Kim HJ; Choi JY; Kim HN
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Aug; 126(8):817-23. PubMed ID: 16846923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-utility analysis of the cochlear implant in children.
    Cheng AK; Rubin HR; Powe NR; Mellon NK; Francis HW; Niparko JK
    JAMA; 2000 Aug; 284(7):850-6. PubMed ID: 10938174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. QALY weights for diabetic retinopathy--a comparison of health state valuations with HUI-3, EQ-5D, EQ-VAS, and TTO.
    Heintz E; Wiréhn AB; Peebo BB; Rosenqvist U; Levin LÅ
    Value Health; 2012 May; 15(3):475-84. PubMed ID: 22583458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality of life in cochlear implantees: comparing utility values obtained through the Medical Outcome Study Short-Form Survey-6D and the Health Utility Index Mark 3.
    Arnoldner C; Lin VY; Bresler R; Kaider A; Kuthubutheen J; Shipp D; Chen JM
    Laryngoscope; 2014 Nov; 124(11):2586-90. PubMed ID: 24536018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rapid and sustained improvement in health-related quality of life and utility for 72 weeks in patients with ankylosing spondylitis receiving etanercept.
    Boonen A; Patel V; Traina S; Chiou CF; Maetzel A; Tsuji W
    J Rheumatol; 2008 Apr; 35(4):662-7. PubMed ID: 18278836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interpreting parental proxy reports of (health-related) quality of life for children with unilateral cochlear implants.
    Sach TH; Barton GR
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Mar; 71(3):435-45. PubMed ID: 17161471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the implantable miniature telescope.
    Brown GC; Brown MM; Lieske HB; Lieske PA; Brown KS; Lane SS
    Ophthalmology; 2011 Sep; 118(9):1834-43. PubMed ID: 21723614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of health state in patients with tinnitus: a comparison of the EQ-5D and HUI mark III.
    Maes IH; Joore MA; Cima RF; Vlaeyen JW; Anteunis LJ
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):428-35. PubMed ID: 21221004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A cost-utility analysis of pediatric cochlear implantation.
    O'Neill C; O'Donoghue GM; Archbold SM; Normand C
    Laryngoscope; 2000 Jan; 110(1):156-60. PubMed ID: 10646733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of health-related-quality of life depends on which utility measure is selected for patients with carpal tunnel syndrome.
    Nazari G; MacDermid JC; Bain J; Levis CM; Thoma A
    J Hand Ther; 2017; 30(3):299-306. PubMed ID: 27988154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measurement of utility.
    Thavorncharoensap M
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 May; 97 Suppl 5():S43-9. PubMed ID: 24964698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-utility analysis of bilateral cochlear implantation in adults: a health economic assessment from the perspective of a publicly funded program.
    Chen JM; Amoodi H; Mittmann N
    Laryngoscope; 2014 Jun; 124(6):1452-8. PubMed ID: 24431194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validity of utility measures for women with urge, stress, and mixed urinary incontinence.
    Harvie HS; Shea JA; Andy UU; Propert K; Schwartz JS; Arya LA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jan; 210(1):85.e1-6. PubMed ID: 24055585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The value-based medicine comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus.
    Roe RH; Lass JH; Brown GC; Brown MM
    Cornea; 2008 Oct; 27(9):1001-7. PubMed ID: 18812762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Agreement between health utility instruments in cochlear implantation.
    Ramakers GG; Smulders YE; van Zon A; Kraaijenga VJ; Stegeman I; Van Zanten GA; Grolman W
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2016 Dec; 41(6):737-743. PubMed ID: 26868059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of measured utility scores and imputed scores from the SF-36 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
    Kaplan RM; Groessl EJ; Sengupta N; Sieber WJ; Ganiats TG
    Med Care; 2005 Jan; 43(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 15626937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of SF-6D and EQ-5D utility scores in a study of patients with schizophrenia.
    McCrone P; Patel A; Knapp M; Schene A; Koeter M; Amaddeo F; Ruggeri M; Giessler A; Puschner B; Thornicroft G
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2009 Mar; 12(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 19346564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of cochlear implants on the functional health status of older adults.
    Francis HW; Chee N; Yeagle J; Cheng A; Niparko JK
    Laryngoscope; 2002 Aug; 112(8 Pt 1):1482-8. PubMed ID: 12172266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The cochlear implant. Study in the profoundly deaf adult from the standpoint of quality of life and therapeutic cost (QALY Index of Quality)].
    Chouard CH
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 1998; 182(5):911-25; discussion 925-6. PubMed ID: 9735498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.