361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25176499)
1. Performance of ACR Lung-RADS in a clinical CT lung screening program.
McKee BJ; Regis SM; McKee AB; Flacke S; Wald C
J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Mar; 12(3):273-6. PubMed ID: 25176499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of ACR Lung-RADS in a Clinical CT Lung Screening Program.
McKee BJ; Regis SM; McKee AB; Flacke S; Wald C
J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Feb; 13(2 Suppl):R25-9. PubMed ID: 26846532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. ACR CT accreditation program and the lung cancer screening program designation.
Kazerooni EA; Armstrong MR; Amorosa JK; Hernandez D; Liebscher LA; Nath H; McNitt-Gray MF; Stern EJ; Wilcox PA
J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Jan; 12(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 25455196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Experience with a CT screening program for individuals at high risk for developing lung cancer.
McKee BJ; Hashim JA; French RJ; McKee AB; Hesketh PJ; Lamb CR; Williamson C; Flacke S; Wald C
J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Feb; 12(2):192-7. PubMed ID: 25176498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Application of Lung-Screening Reporting and Data System Versus Pan-Canadian Early Detection of Lung Cancer Nodule Risk Calculation in the Alberta Lung Cancer Screening Study.
Tremblay A; Taghizadeh N; MacGregor JH; Armstrong G; Bristow MS; Guo LLQ; Lydell C; Pereira R; Lee A; Elliot T; MacEachern P; Graham A; Dickinson JA; Koetzler R; Lam SC; Yang H; Bédard EL; Tammemagi M; Burrowes P
J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Oct; 16(10):1425-1432. PubMed ID: 31103442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Focal Breast Lesions in Clinical CT Examinations of the Chest: A Retrospective Analysis.
Krug KB; Houbois C; Grinstein O; Borggrefe J; Puesken M; Hanstein B; Malter W; Maintz D; Hellmich M
Rofo; 2017 Oct; 189(10):977-989. PubMed ID: 28683503
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of the Vancouver Risk Calculator Compared with Lung-RADS in an Urban, Diverse Clinical Lung Cancer Screening Cohort.
Kessler A; Peng R; Mardakhaev E; Haramati LB; White CS
Radiol Imaging Cancer; 2020 Mar; 2(2):e190021. PubMed ID: 33778703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retrospective review of lung cancers diagnosed in annual rounds of CT screening.
Xu DM; Yip R; Smith JP; Yankelevitz DF; Henschke CI;
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Nov; 203(5):965-72. PubMed ID: 25247825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness of Lung-RADS in Reducing False-Positive Results in a Diverse, Underserved, Urban Lung Cancer Screening Cohort.
Kaminetzky M; Milch HS; Shmukler A; Kessler A; Peng R; Mardakhaev E; Bellin EY; Levsky JM; Haramati LB
J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Apr; 16(4 Pt A):419-426. PubMed ID: 30146484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Strategies for Reducing False-Positive Screening Results for Intermediate-Size Nodules Evaluated Using Lung-RADS: A Secondary Analysis of National Lung Screening Trial Data.
Hammer MM; Hunsaker AR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Sep; 219(3):397-405. PubMed ID: 35319912
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Reduction in Thyroid Nodule Biopsies and Improved Accuracy with American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System.
Hoang JK; Middleton WD; Farjat AE; Langer JE; Reading CC; Teefey SA; Abinanti N; Boschini FJ; Bronner AJ; Dahiya N; Hertzberg BS; Newman JR; Scanga D; Vogler RC; Tessler FN
Radiology; 2018 Apr; 287(1):185-193. PubMed ID: 29498593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cancer Risk in Nodules Detected at Follow-Up Lung Cancer Screening CT.
Hammer MM; Byrne SC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Apr; 218(4):634-641. PubMed ID: 34755524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System Speed and Accuracy Are Increased With the Use of a Semiautomated Computer Application.
Clark TJ; Flood TF; Maximin ST; Sachs PB
J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Dec; 12(12 Pt A):1301-6. PubMed ID: 26507823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lung-RADS Version 1.0 versus Lung-RADS Version 1.1: Comparison of Categories Using Nodules from the National Lung Screening Trial.
Kastner J; Hossain R; Jeudy J; Dako F; Mehta V; Dalal S; Dharaiya E; White C
Radiology; 2021 Jul; 300(1):199-206. PubMed ID: 33944631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Experience With a CT Screening Program for Individuals at High Risk for Developing Lung Cancer.
McKee BJ; Hashim JA; French RJ; McKee AB; Hesketh PJ; Lamb CR; Williamson C; Flacke S; Wald C
J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Feb; 13(2 Suppl):R8-R13. PubMed ID: 26846536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cumulative incidence of false-positive test results in lung cancer screening: a randomized trial.
Croswell JM; Baker SG; Marcus PM; Clapp JD; Kramer BS
Ann Intern Med; 2010 Apr; 152(8):505-12, W176-80. PubMed ID: 20404381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Real-World Lung Cancer CT Screening Performance, Smoking Behavior, and Adherence to Recommendations: Lung-RADS Category and Smoking Status Predict Adherence.
Barbosa EJM; Yang R; Hershman M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Apr; 216(4):919-926. PubMed ID: 32755178
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison Between Radiological Semantic Features and Lung-RADS in Predicting Malignancy of Screen-Detected Lung Nodules in the National Lung Screening Trial.
Li Q; Balagurunathan Y; Liu Y; Qi J; Schabath MB; Ye Z; Gillies RJ
Clin Lung Cancer; 2018 Mar; 19(2):148-156.e3. PubMed ID: 29137847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Receipt of Recommended Follow-up Care After a Positive Lung Cancer Screening Examination.
Rivera MP; Durham DD; Long JM; Perera P; Lane L; Lamb D; Metwally E; Henderson LM
JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Nov; 5(11):e2240403. PubMed ID: 36326760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of Alternative Diagnostic Follow-up Intervals for Lung Reporting and Data System Criteria on the Effectiveness of Lung Cancer Screening.
Bastani M; Toumazis I; Hedou' J; Leung A; Plevritis SK
J Am Coll Radiol; 2021 Dec; 18(12):1614-1623. PubMed ID: 34419477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]