These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2517696)
1. Usefulness of bone mass measurements by photon absorptiometry. Hassager C; Christiansen C Public Health Rep; 1989; 104 Suppl(Suppl):23-6. PubMed ID: 2517696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Peripheral bone densitometry: an old friend revisited. Kleerekoper M; Nelson DA Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc; 1998; 109():62-70; discussion 70-2. PubMed ID: 9601128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: a precise method of measuring bone mineral density in the lumbar spine. Hansen MA; Hassager C; Overgaard K; Marslew U; Riis BJ; Christiansen C J Nucl Med; 1990 Jul; 31(7):1156-62. PubMed ID: 2362194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Discriminative ability of total body bone-mineral measured by dual photon absorptiometry. Gotfredsen A; Pødenphant J; Nilas L; Christiansen C Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1989 Apr; 49(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 2520364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Evaluation of optimal measuring site and index by QDR4500A for postmenopausal bone loss]. Deng X; Liao E; Wu X; Zhou Z; Chao C; Wu H Hunan Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 1997; 22(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 9868057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Peripheral and central measurements of bone mineral density are equally strongly associated with clinical risk factors for osteoporosis. Patel R; Blake GM; Fogelman I Calcif Tissue Int; 2007 Feb; 80(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 17308990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Noninvasive axial and peripheral assessment of bone mineral content: a comparison between osteoporotic women and normal subjects. Van Berkum FN; Birkenhäger JC; Van Veen LC; Zeelenberg J; Birkenhäger-Frenkel DH; Trouerbach WT; Stijnen T; Pols HA J Bone Miner Res; 1989 Oct; 4(5):679-85. PubMed ID: 2816513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does a single local absorptiometric bone measurement indicate the overall skeletal status? Implications for osteoporosis and osteoarthritis of the hip. Gotfredsen A; Riis BJ; Christiansen C; Rødbro P Clin Rheumatol; 1990 Jun; 9(2):193-203. PubMed ID: 2390848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ability of peripheral DXA measurements of the forearm to predict low axial bone mineral density at menopause. Pouillès JM; Tremollières FA; Martinez S; Delsol M; Ribot C Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 11305086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Usefulness of regional bone measurements in patients with osteoporotic fractures of the spine and distal forearm. Nilas L; Pødenphant J; Riis BJ; Gotfredsen A; Christiansen C J Nucl Med; 1987 Jun; 28(6):960-5. PubMed ID: 3585503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The diagnostic validity of local and total bone mineral measurements in postmenopausal osteoporosis and osteoarthritis. Nilas L; Gotfredsen A; Riis BJ; Christiansen C Clin Endocrinol (Oxf); 1986 Dec; 25(6):711-20. PubMed ID: 3652471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bone mass measured by photon absorptiometry: comparison of forearm, heel, and spine. Hansen MA; Riis BJ; Overgaard K; Hassager C; Christiansen C Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1990 Sep; 50(5):517-23. PubMed ID: 2237264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bone mineral density of the spine, hip and distal forearm in representative samples of the Japanese female population: Japanese Population-Based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Study. Iki M; Kagamimori S; Kagawa Y; Matsuzaki T; Yoneshima H; Marumo F Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(7):529-37. PubMed ID: 11527049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Advantages of peripheral radiogrametry over dual-photon absorptiometry of the spine in the assessment of prevalence of osteoporotic vertebral fractures in women. Meema HE; Meindok H J Bone Miner Res; 1992 Aug; 7(8):897-903. PubMed ID: 1442203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of bone mass in forearm, lumbar vertebra and hip by single and/or dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Qin M; Lin S; Song Z; Tian J; Chen F; Yan H; Ge Q Chin Med Sci J; 1999 Jun; 14(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 12901622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the calcaneus: comparison with other techniques to assess bone density and value in predicting risk of spine fracture. Yamada M; Ito M; Hayashi K; Ohki M; Nakamura T AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Dec; 163(6):1435-40. PubMed ID: 7992742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The spine deformity index in osteoporosis is not related to bone mineral and ultrasound measurements. Bernecker P; Pietschmann P; Winkelbauer F; Krexner E; Resch H; Willvonseder R Br J Radiol; 1992 May; 65(773):393-6. PubMed ID: 1611418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Calcaneus as a site for assessment of bone mineral density: evaluation in cadavers and healthy volunteers. Yamada M; Ito M; Hayashi K; Nakamura T AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Sep; 161(3):621-7. PubMed ID: 8352120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bone mass measurement: how, where, when and why? Delmas PD Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud; 1993; 38 Suppl 2():70-6. PubMed ID: 8252108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of peripheral dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: comparison with single photon absorptiometry of the forearm and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the spine or femur. Mole PA; McMurdo ME; Paterson CR Br J Radiol; 1998 Apr; 71(844):427-32. PubMed ID: 9659136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]