228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2517696)
1. Usefulness of bone mass measurements by photon absorptiometry.
Hassager C; Christiansen C
Public Health Rep; 1989; 104 Suppl(Suppl):23-6. PubMed ID: 2517696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Peripheral bone densitometry: an old friend revisited.
Kleerekoper M; Nelson DA
Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc; 1998; 109():62-70; discussion 70-2. PubMed ID: 9601128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: a precise method of measuring bone mineral density in the lumbar spine.
Hansen MA; Hassager C; Overgaard K; Marslew U; Riis BJ; Christiansen C
J Nucl Med; 1990 Jul; 31(7):1156-62. PubMed ID: 2362194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Discriminative ability of total body bone-mineral measured by dual photon absorptiometry.
Gotfredsen A; Pødenphant J; Nilas L; Christiansen C
Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1989 Apr; 49(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 2520364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Evaluation of optimal measuring site and index by QDR4500A for postmenopausal bone loss].
Deng X; Liao E; Wu X; Zhou Z; Chao C; Wu H
Hunan Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 1997; 22(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 9868057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Peripheral and central measurements of bone mineral density are equally strongly associated with clinical risk factors for osteoporosis.
Patel R; Blake GM; Fogelman I
Calcif Tissue Int; 2007 Feb; 80(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 17308990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Noninvasive axial and peripheral assessment of bone mineral content: a comparison between osteoporotic women and normal subjects.
Van Berkum FN; Birkenhäger JC; Van Veen LC; Zeelenberg J; Birkenhäger-Frenkel DH; Trouerbach WT; Stijnen T; Pols HA
J Bone Miner Res; 1989 Oct; 4(5):679-85. PubMed ID: 2816513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does a single local absorptiometric bone measurement indicate the overall skeletal status? Implications for osteoporosis and osteoarthritis of the hip.
Gotfredsen A; Riis BJ; Christiansen C; Rødbro P
Clin Rheumatol; 1990 Jun; 9(2):193-203. PubMed ID: 2390848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ability of peripheral DXA measurements of the forearm to predict low axial bone mineral density at menopause.
Pouillès JM; Tremollières FA; Martinez S; Delsol M; Ribot C
Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 11305086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Usefulness of regional bone measurements in patients with osteoporotic fractures of the spine and distal forearm.
Nilas L; Pødenphant J; Riis BJ; Gotfredsen A; Christiansen C
J Nucl Med; 1987 Jun; 28(6):960-5. PubMed ID: 3585503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The diagnostic validity of local and total bone mineral measurements in postmenopausal osteoporosis and osteoarthritis.
Nilas L; Gotfredsen A; Riis BJ; Christiansen C
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf); 1986 Dec; 25(6):711-20. PubMed ID: 3652471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bone mass measured by photon absorptiometry: comparison of forearm, heel, and spine.
Hansen MA; Riis BJ; Overgaard K; Hassager C; Christiansen C
Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1990 Sep; 50(5):517-23. PubMed ID: 2237264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bone mineral density of the spine, hip and distal forearm in representative samples of the Japanese female population: Japanese Population-Based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Study.
Iki M; Kagamimori S; Kagawa Y; Matsuzaki T; Yoneshima H; Marumo F
Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(7):529-37. PubMed ID: 11527049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Advantages of peripheral radiogrametry over dual-photon absorptiometry of the spine in the assessment of prevalence of osteoporotic vertebral fractures in women.
Meema HE; Meindok H
J Bone Miner Res; 1992 Aug; 7(8):897-903. PubMed ID: 1442203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of bone mass in forearm, lumbar vertebra and hip by single and/or dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Qin M; Lin S; Song Z; Tian J; Chen F; Yan H; Ge Q
Chin Med Sci J; 1999 Jun; 14(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 12901622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the calcaneus: comparison with other techniques to assess bone density and value in predicting risk of spine fracture.
Yamada M; Ito M; Hayashi K; Ohki M; Nakamura T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Dec; 163(6):1435-40. PubMed ID: 7992742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The spine deformity index in osteoporosis is not related to bone mineral and ultrasound measurements.
Bernecker P; Pietschmann P; Winkelbauer F; Krexner E; Resch H; Willvonseder R
Br J Radiol; 1992 May; 65(773):393-6. PubMed ID: 1611418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Calcaneus as a site for assessment of bone mineral density: evaluation in cadavers and healthy volunteers.
Yamada M; Ito M; Hayashi K; Nakamura T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Sep; 161(3):621-7. PubMed ID: 8352120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bone mass measurement: how, where, when and why?
Delmas PD
Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud; 1993; 38 Suppl 2():70-6. PubMed ID: 8252108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of peripheral dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: comparison with single photon absorptiometry of the forearm and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the spine or femur.
Mole PA; McMurdo ME; Paterson CR
Br J Radiol; 1998 Apr; 71(844):427-32. PubMed ID: 9659136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
