158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25177107)
1. Bias and Stability of Single Variable Classifiers for Feature Ranking and Selection.
Fakhraei S; Soltanian-Zadeh H; Fotouhi F
Expert Syst Appl; 2014 Nov; 14(15):6945-6958. PubMed ID: 25177107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Current-Visit and Next-Visit Prediction for Fatty Liver Disease With a Large-Scale Dataset: Model Development and Performance Comparison.
Wu CT; Chu TW; Jang JR
JMIR Med Inform; 2021 Aug; 9(8):e26398. PubMed ID: 34387552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Novel Blunge Calibration Intelligent Feature Classification Model for the Prediction of Hypothyroid Disease.
Devi MS; Kumar VD; Brezulianu A; Geman O; Arif M
Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jan; 23(3):. PubMed ID: 36772168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative study on feature selection for a risk prediction model for colorectal cancer.
Cueto-López N; García-Ordás MT; Dávila-Batista V; Moreno V; Aragonés N; Alaiz-Rodríguez R
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Aug; 177():219-229. PubMed ID: 31319951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of feature selection and classification for MALDI-MS data.
Liu Q; Sung AH; Qiao M; Chen Z; Yang JY; Yang MQ; Huang X; Deng Y
BMC Genomics; 2009 Jul; 10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S3. PubMed ID: 19594880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of diabetic protein markers based on an ensemble method.
Qu K; Zou Q; Shi H
Front Biosci (Landmark Ed); 2021 Jul; 26(7):207-221. PubMed ID: 34340268
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of Feature Selection Techniques for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.
López NC; García-Ordás MT; Vitelli-Storelli F; Fernández-Navarro P; Palazuelos C; Alaiz-Rodríguez R
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Oct; 18(20):. PubMed ID: 34682416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance comparison of 10 different classification techniques in segmenting white matter hyperintensities in aging.
Dadar M; Maranzano J; Misquitta K; Anor CJ; Fonov VS; Tartaglia MC; Carmichael OT; Decarli C; Collins DL;
Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 157():233-249. PubMed ID: 28602597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Top scoring pairs for feature selection in machine learning and applications to cancer outcome prediction.
Shi P; Ray S; Zhu Q; Kon MA
BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Sep; 12():375. PubMed ID: 21939564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. R-HEFS: Rough set based heterogeneous ensemble feature selection method for medical data classification.
Bania RK; Halder A
Artif Intell Med; 2021 Apr; 114():102049. PubMed ID: 33875164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Missing data imputation, prediction, and feature selection in diagnosis of vaginal prolapse.
Fan M; Peng X; Niu X; Cui T; He Q
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Nov; 23(1):259. PubMed ID: 37932660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using multiple classifiers for predicting the risk of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair re-intervention through hybrid feature selection.
Attallah O; Karthikesalingam A; Holt PJ; Thompson MM; Sayers R; Bown MJ; Choke EC; Ma X
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2017 Nov; 231(11):1048-1063. PubMed ID: 28925817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A New Direction of Cancer Classification: Positive Effect of Low-Ranking MicroRNAs.
Li F; Piao M; Piao Y; Li M; Ryu KH
Osong Public Health Res Perspect; 2014 Oct; 5(5):279-85. PubMed ID: 25389514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mito-GSAAC: mitochondria prediction using genetic ensemble classifier and split amino acid composition.
Afridi TH; Khan A; Lee YS
Amino Acids; 2012 Apr; 42(4):1443-54. PubMed ID: 21445589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction of heart disease and classifiers' sensitivity analysis.
Almustafa KM
BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Jul; 21(1):278. PubMed ID: 32615980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mammographic masses characterization based on localized texture and dataset fractal analysis using linear, neural and support vector machine classifiers.
Mavroforakis ME; Georgiou HV; Dimitropoulos N; Cavouras D; Theodoridis S
Artif Intell Med; 2006 Jun; 37(2):145-62. PubMed ID: 16716579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new hybrid filter/wrapper algorithm for feature selection in classification.
Zhang J; Xiong Y; Min S
Anal Chim Acta; 2019 Nov; 1080():43-54. PubMed ID: 31409474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ensemble of random forests One vs. Rest classifiers for MCI and AD prediction using ANOVA cortical and subcortical feature selection and partial least squares.
Ramírez J; Górriz JM; Ortiz A; Martínez-Murcia FJ; Segovia F; Salas-Gonzalez D; Castillo-Barnes D; Illán IA; Puntonet CG;
J Neurosci Methods; 2018 May; 302():47-57. PubMed ID: 29242123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of Classifier Performance for Multiclass Phenotype Discrimination in Untargeted Metabolomics.
Trainor PJ; DeFilippis AP; Rai SN
Metabolites; 2017 Jun; 7(2):. PubMed ID: 28635678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comprehensive study of brain tumour discrimination using phase combinations, feature rankings, and hybridised classifiers.
Koyuncu H; Barstuğan M; Öziç MÜ
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2020 Dec; 58(12):2971-2987. PubMed ID: 33006703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
