These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25177144)

  • 1. A note on digital dental radiography in forensic odontology.
    Chiam SL
    J Forensic Dent Sci; 2014 Sep; 6(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 25177144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forensic odontology with digital technologies: A systematic review.
    Matsuda S; Yoshida H; Ebata K; Shimada I; Yoshimura H
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2020 Aug; 74():102004. PubMed ID: 32658766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How many times can we use a phosphor plate? A preliminary study.
    Ergün S; Güneri P; Ilgüy D; Ilgüy M; Boyacioglu H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Jan; 38(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 19114423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effective and quality-controlled use of digital radiography in dental practice.
    Koch S; Wagner IV; Schneider W
    Int J Comput Dent; 2000 May; 3(2):107-18. PubMed ID: 11351550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital radiography: an overview.
    Parks ET; Williamson GF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2002 Nov; 3(4):23-39. PubMed ID: 12444400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital imaging methods as an aid in dental identification of human remains.
    Bowers CM; Johansen RJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 Mar; 47(2):354-9. PubMed ID: 11908607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Generation of intra-oral-like images from cone beam computed tomography volumes for dental forensic image comparison.
    Trochesset DA; Serchuk RB; Colosi DC
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Mar; 59(2):510-3. PubMed ID: 24328928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital panoramic and extraoral imaging.
    Dove SB; McDavid WD
    Dent Clin North Am; 1993 Oct; 37(4):541-51. PubMed ID: 8224331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital image fraudulence: A curse to forensic odontology.
    Karyakarte G; Dive A; Bodhade A; Khandekar S
    J Forensic Dent Sci; 2018; 10(2):67-70. PubMed ID: 30745779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Filmless imaging: the uses of digital radiography in dental practice.
    van der Stelt PF
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Oct; 136(10):1379-87. PubMed ID: 16255462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intraoral radiology in general dental practices - a comparison of digital and film-based X-ray systems with regard to radiation protection and dose reduction.
    Anissi HD; Geibel MA
    Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):762-7. PubMed ID: 24648236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of digital images acquired using different phosphor storage plates (PSPs) subjected to varying reading times and storage conditions.
    Martins MG; Haiter Neto F; Whaites EJ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 May; 32(3):186-90. PubMed ID: 12917285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Image quality in partially erased DenOptix storage phosphor plates.
    Lopes SL; Cruz AD; Ferreira RI; Bóscolo FN; Almeida SM
    Braz Oral Res; 2008; 22(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 18425250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Morphologic analysis of third-molar maturity by digital orthopantomographic assessment.
    Introna F; Santoro V; De Donno A; Belviso M
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2008 Mar; 29(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 19749618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Efficiency and Image Quality of Photostimulable Phosphor Plate and Charge-Coupled Device Receptors in Dental Radiography.
    Zhang W; Huynh C; Jadhav A; Pinales J; Arvizu L; Tsai J; Flores N
    J Dent Educ; 2019 Oct; 83(10):1205-1212. PubMed ID: 31235501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Forensic oral imaging quality of hand-held dental X-ray devices: comparison of two image receptors and two devices.
    Pittayapat P; Thevissen P; Fieuws S; Jacobs R; Willems G
    Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Jan; 194(1-3):20-7. PubMed ID: 19913377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficacy of digital intra-oral radiography in clinical dentistry.
    Versteeg CH; Sanderink GC; van der Stelt PF
    J Dent; 1997; 25(3-4):215-24. PubMed ID: 9175348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Fraudulent use of digital radiographs: secret reality or fiction?].
    Calberson F; Hommez G; De Moor R
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2005; 60(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 15943060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of the response of storage phosphor and film radiography to small variations in X-ray exposure.
    Hildebolt CF; Fletcher G; Yokoyama-Crothers N; Conover GL; Vannier MW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 May; 26(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9442600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testing a Novel 3D Printed Radiographic Imaging Device for Use in Forensic Odontology.
    Newcomb TL; Bruhn AM; Giles B; Garcia HM; Diawara N
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Jan; 62(1):223-228. PubMed ID: 27859228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.