These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25178207)

  • 1. [Re: Why are results of organised mammography screening so difficult to interpret?].
    Zahl PH
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2014 Sep; 134(16):1544-5. PubMed ID: 25178207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Why are results of organised mammography screening so difficult to interpret?
    Falk RS
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2014 Jun; 134(11):1124-6. PubMed ID: 24939774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Who gets screened, and where: a comparison of organised and opportunistic mammography screening in Geneva, Switzerland.
    Chamot E; Charvet AI; Perneger TV
    Eur J Cancer; 2007 Feb; 43(3):576-84. PubMed ID: 17223542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Attendance in the second phase (2004-2005) of the Hungarian organized breast cancer screening program].
    Boncz I; Sebestyén A; Döbrossy L; Péntek Z; Kovács A; Budai A; Kövi R; Ember I
    Orv Hetil; 2008 Aug; 149(32):1491-8. PubMed ID: 18672438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Participation rates in the third round (2006-2007) of the breast cancer screening program in Hungary].
    Boncz I; Döbrõssy L; Péntek Z; Kovács A; Budai A; Vajda R; Sebestyén A
    Magy Onkol; 2013 Sep; 57(3):140-6. PubMed ID: 24107819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variation in performance in low-volume mammography screening programmes: experience from Switzerland.
    Bulliard JL; Ducros C; Dayer E; Arzel B; Levi F
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2011 Jun; 35(3):293-7. PubMed ID: 20729158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reattendance in the Swiss mammography screening pilot programme.
    Bulliard JL; De Landtsheer JP; Levi F
    J Med Screen; 2004; 11(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 15153319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic versus organised mammography screening in Switzerland.
    de Gelder R; Bulliard JL; de Wolf C; Fracheboud J; Draisma G; Schopper D; de Koning HJ
    Eur J Cancer; 2009 Jan; 45(1):127-38. PubMed ID: 19038540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Australia's national breast screening program 18 years on: time for a new direction?
    Spillane AJ; Brennan ME
    ANZ J Surg; 2009 Oct; 79(10):674-6. PubMed ID: 19878156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of two view and one view mammography in the detection of small invasive cancers: results from the National Health Service breast screening programme.
    Blanks RG; Moss SM; Wallis MG
    J Med Screen; 1996; 3(4):200-3. PubMed ID: 9041485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unfavorable outcome of recent breast cancer screening trials: why?
    Watmough DJ; Quan KM; Aspden RM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Nov; 159(5):1125-6. PubMed ID: 1414791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reduction in advanced breast cancer after introduction of a mammography screening program in Tyrol/Austria.
    Oberaigner W; Geiger-Gritsch S; Edlinger M; Daniaux M; Knapp R; Hubalek M; Siebert U; Marth C; Buchberger W
    Breast; 2017 Jun; 33():178-182. PubMed ID: 28419909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Early evaluation of an organised mammography screening program in Greece 2004-2009.
    Simou E; Tsimitselis D; Tsopanlioti M; Anastasakis I; Papatheodorou D; Kourlaba G; Gerasimos P; Maniadakis N
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2011 Aug; 35(4):375-80. PubMed ID: 21474412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital Compared with Screen-Film Mammography: Measures of Diagnostic Accuracy among Women Screened in the Ontario Breast Screening Program--Evidence that Direct Radiography Is Superior to Computed Radiography for Cancer Detection.
    Pisano ED
    Radiology; 2016 Feb; 278(2):311-2. PubMed ID: 26789598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Re: "Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: randomised screening trial".
    Weiss NS
    Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Oct; 180(7):759-60. PubMed ID: 25194149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital mammography in breast cancer screening: a step forward?
    Bluekens AM; Broeders MJ; den Heeten GJ
    Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2013 May; 13(5):505-7. PubMed ID: 23617341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A simple way to measure the burden of interval cancers in breast cancer screening.
    Andersen SB; Törnberg S; Lynge E; Von Euler-Chelpin M; Njor SH
    BMC Cancer; 2014 Oct; 14():782. PubMed ID: 25344115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Synthetic 2D Mammography versus Digital Mammography: Evaluation in a Population-based Screening Program.
    Hofvind S; Hovda T; Holen ÅS; Lee CI; Albertsen J; Bjørndal H; Brandal SHB; Gullien R; Lømo J; Park D; Romundstad L; Suhrke P; Vigeland E; Skaane P
    Radiology; 2018 Jun; 287(3):787-794. PubMed ID: 29494322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Photon-counting digital mammography: evaluation of performance under clinically relevant conditions.
    Karellas A
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Aug; 19(8):913-5. PubMed ID: 22770464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Too much mammography.
    Kalager M; Adami HO; Bretthauer M
    BMJ; 2014 Feb; 348():g1403. PubMed ID: 24519765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.