These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25178207)

  • 21. Evaluation of a mammography screening program within the population-based Vorarlberg Health Monitoring & Prevention Program (VHM&PP).
    Nagel G; Oberaigner W; Peter RS; Ulmer H; Concin H
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 39(6):812-8. PubMed ID: 26651439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Results of mammographic screening and organizational aspects].
    Rosselli del Turco M
    Ann Ostet Ginecol Med Perinat; 1989; Spec No():101-13. PubMed ID: 2774437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [The eternal problem of false positives in mammography screening].
    Seguí Díaz M
    Semergen; 2017 Mar; 43(2):151-153. PubMed ID: 27117788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Recommendations of the French Society of Mammography and Breast Pathology on quality criteria in mass screening for breast cancer in France].
    Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1994 Oct; 89(10):510-1. PubMed ID: 7817080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. EMAS position statement: individualized breast cancer screening versus population-based mammography screening programmes.
    Depypere H; Desreux J; Pérez-López FR; Ceausu I; Erel CT; Lambrinoudaki I; Schenck-Gustafsson K; van der Schouw YT; Simoncini T; Tremollieres F; Rees M; EMAS
    Maturitas; 2014 Dec; 79(4):481-6. PubMed ID: 25277123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Results of monitoring the year 2002 of the Hungarian breast cancer screening program].
    Boncz I; Hoffer G; Sebestyén A; Dózsa C; Ember I
    Magy Onkol; 2005; 49(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 16249805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mammography screening is not as good as we hoped.
    Jørgensen KJ
    Maturitas; 2010 Jan; 65(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 19939593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Screening mammography for women aged 40-49: are we off the fence yet?
    Barton MB
    CMAJ; 2001 Feb; 164(4):498-9. PubMed ID: 11233871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography in a population-based screening program: The Sogn and Fjordane study.
    Juel IM; Skaane P; Hoff SR; Johannessen G; Hofvind S
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Nov; 51(9):962-8. PubMed ID: 20942729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mammography: choices.
    Colyar MR
    Adv Nurse Pract; 2001 Nov; 9(11):25. PubMed ID: 12420495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Age and interval for screening mammography: whom do you believe?
    Venta LA; Goodhartz LA
    Semin Surg Oncol; 1996; 12(5):281-9. PubMed ID: 8873315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [The state of the organised mammography screening in Hungary in 2006].
    Kovács A; Döbrossy L; Budai A; Boncz I; Cornides A
    Orv Hetil; 2007 May; 148(19):879-85. PubMed ID: 17478403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. ACP Journal Club. Annual mammography screening did not reduce long-term breast cancer mortality in women 40 to 59 years of age.
    Fletcher SW
    Ann Intern Med; 2014 May; 160(10):JC7. PubMed ID: 24842441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Double reading in breast-cancer screening: what women know about it].
    Desjeux G; Aspar AM; d'Istria EC; Raude D; Audet-Lapointe M; Balaire C; Codaccioni A
    Presse Med; 2008 Sep; 37(9):1205-11. PubMed ID: 18367367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Point/counterpoint. Ultrasonography is soon likely to become a viable alternative to x-ray mammography for breast cancer screening.
    Glide-Hurst CK; Maidment AD; Orton CG
    Med Phys; 2010 Sep; 37(9):4526-9. PubMed ID: 20964169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Controversy surrounding mammography screening? Not in our opinion.
    Drukteinis JS; Kiluk JV
    Cancer Control; 2014 Apr; 21(2):176-7. PubMed ID: 24667405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Baseline screening mammography with one versus two views.
    Anttinen I; Pamilo M; Roiha M; Soiva M; Suramo I
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 Nov; 9(4):241-3. PubMed ID: 2591390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Digital mammography: clinical image evaluation.
    Bassett LW; Hoyt AC; Oshiro T
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):903-15. PubMed ID: 20868893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mammography in the Edinburgh breast screening project.
    Milne L
    Radiography; 1979 Aug; 45(536):176-8. PubMed ID: 504619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mobile mammography fosters compliance.
    Heilbrunn KS
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1992 Sep; 14(9):55-8. PubMed ID: 10147891
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.