138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25179163)
1. Increasing food deprivation relative to baseline influences D-amphetamine dose-response gradients.
Lotfizadeh AD; Zimmermann ZJ; Watkins EE; Edwards TL; Poling A
Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2014 Oct; 125():65-69. PubMed ID: 25179163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Discriminative properties of the psychostimulant dl-cathinone in a two lever operant task. Lack of evidence for dopaminergic mediation.
Goudie AJ; Atkinson J; West CR
Neuropharmacology; 1986 Jan; 25(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 2869439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the effects of 2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine and D-amphetamine on the ability of rats to discriminate the durations and intensities of light stimuli.
Hampson CL; Body S; den Boon FS; Cheung TH; Bezzina G; Langley RW; Fone KC; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
Behav Pharmacol; 2010 Feb; 21(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 19949322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Discriminative stimulus and reinforcing effects of p-fluoro-L-deprenyl in monkeys.
Yasar S; Gaal J; Justinova Z; Bergman J
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2005 Oct; 182(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 15990999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influencing the specificity of drug mixture discriminations by varying the training procedure.
Stolerman IP; Mariathasan EA; White JA
Behav Pharmacol; 1999 Nov; 10(6-7):657-64. PubMed ID: 10780507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of altering motivation for food in rats trained with food reinforcement to discriminate between d-amphetamine and saline injections.
Lotfizadeh AD; Redner R; Edwards TL; Quisenberry AJ; Baker LE; Poling A
Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2012 Dec; 103(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 22963928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The 5-HT3 receptor partial agonist MD-354 (meta-chlorophenylguanidine) enhances the discriminative stimulus actions of (+)amphetamine in rats.
Dukat M; Wesolowska A; Young R; Glennon RA
Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2007; 87(2):203-7. PubMed ID: 17540440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. (-)-Nornicotine partially substitutes for (+)-amphetamine in a drug discrimination paradigm in rats.
Bardo MT; Bevins RA; Klebaur JE; Crooks PA; Dwoskin LP
Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1997 Dec; 58(4):1083-7. PubMed ID: 9408217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Individual differences in response to novelty, amphetamine-induced activity and drug discrimination in rats.
Bevins RA; Klebaur JE; Bardo MT
Behav Pharmacol; 1997 Jun; 8(2-3):113-23. PubMed ID: 9833007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of training dose on the relationship between discriminative-stimulus and self-reported drug effects of d-amphetamine in humans.
Kollins SH; Rush CR
Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1999 Oct; 64(2):319-26. PubMed ID: 10515308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Facilitatory and inhibitory actions of morphine on the discriminative stimulus properties of D-amphetamine.
Gaiardi M; Bartoletti M; Gubellini C
Pharmacol Res; 1998 Nov; 38(5):333-7. PubMed ID: 9806811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. d-Amphetamine discrimination established under a conditional discrimination procedure in pigeons.
Watanabe S
Yakubutsu Seishin Kodo; 1983 May; 3(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 6666378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Discriminative characteristics of high and low cocaine administration: effect of other psychostimulants.
Schechter MD
Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1997 Mar; 56(3):457-63. PubMed ID: 9077583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of training dose in male Sprague-Dawley rats trained to discriminate 4-methylmethcathinone.
Berquist MD; Thompson NA; Baker LE
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2017 Nov; 234(21):3271-3278. PubMed ID: 28815279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Chronic d-amphetamine or methamphetamine produces cross-tolerance to the discriminative and reinforcing stimulus effects of cocaine.
Peltier RL; Li DH; Lytle D; Taylor CM; Emmett-Oglesby MW
J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1996 Apr; 277(1):212-8. PubMed ID: 8613921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reinforcement schedule effects in rats trained to discriminate 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) or cocaine.
Kueh D; Baker LE
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2007 Jan; 189(4):447-57. PubMed ID: 17019568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Similar effects of amphetamine and methylphenidate on the performance of complex operant tasks in rats.
Mayorga AJ; Popke EJ; Fogle CM; Paule MG
Behav Brain Res; 2000 Apr; 109(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 10699658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Amphetamine disrupts negative patterning but does not produce configural association deficits on an alternative task.
Blackburn JR; Hevenor SJ
Behav Brain Res; 1996 Oct; 80(1-2):41-9. PubMed ID: 8905127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lack of generalization of nisoxetine with amphetamine in the rat.
Schechter MD; Boja JW
Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1988 Aug; 30(4):1085-8. PubMed ID: 3265789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of training conditions in discrimination of central nervous system stimulants by rats.
Stolerman IP; D'Mello GD
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1981; 73(3):295-303. PubMed ID: 6113619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
