These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25179387)

  • 1. Evaluating the quality of internet information for bariatric surgery.
    Akbari K; Som R
    Obes Surg; 2014 Nov; 24(11):2003-6. PubMed ID: 25179387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What is the quality of information about bariatric surgery on the internet?
    Makar B; Quilliot D; Zarnegar R; Levan T; Ayav A; Bresler L; Boissel P; Brunaud L
    Obes Surg; 2008 Nov; 18(11):1455-9. PubMed ID: 18401669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality of Information About Bariatric Surgery on the Internet: A Two-Continent Comparison of Website Content.
    Barajas-Gamboa JS; Klingler M; Landreneau J; Strong A; Al Zubaidi A; Sharadgah H; Del Gobbo GD; Abril C; Kroh M; Corcelles R
    Obes Surg; 2020 May; 30(5):1736-1744. PubMed ID: 31950316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality Assessment of Information on Bariatric Surgery Websites.
    Vetter D; Ruhwinkel H; Raptis DA; Bueter M
    Obes Surg; 2018 May; 28(5):1240-1247. PubMed ID: 29110245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The evaluation of anaesthesia-related information on the Internet.
    Corcoran TB; Ward M; Jarosz K; Schug SA
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2009 Jan; 37(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 19157351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of the quality and variability of health information on chronic pain websites using the DISCERN instrument.
    Kaicker J; Borg Debono V; Dang W; Buckley N; Thabane L
    BMC Med; 2010 Oct; 8():59. PubMed ID: 20939875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Specialized medical search-engines are no better than general search-engines in sourcing consumer information about androgen deficiency.
    Ilic D; Bessell TL; Silagy CA; Green S
    Hum Reprod; 2003 Mar; 18(3):557-61. PubMed ID: 12615824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relative quality of internet-derived gastrointestinal cancer information.
    Chan DS; Willicombe A; Reid TD; Beaton C; Arnold D; Ward J; Davies IL; Lewis WG
    J Cancer Educ; 2012 Dec; 27(4):676-9. PubMed ID: 22918796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The quality of information about sickle cell disease on the Internet for youth.
    Breakey VR; Harris L; Davis O; Agarwal A; Ouellette C; Akinnawo E; Stinson J
    Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2017 Apr; 64(4):. PubMed ID: 27786409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of the quality of Internet information on sleeve gastrectomy.
    Corcelles R; Daigle CR; Talamas HR; Brethauer SA; Schauer PR
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2015; 11(3):539-44. PubMed ID: 25604832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accessibility, nature and quality of health information on the Internet: a survey on osteoarthritis.
    Maloney S; Ilic D; Green S
    Rheumatology (Oxford); 2005 Mar; 44(3):382-5. PubMed ID: 15572390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dissemination of 'patient-oriented evidence that matters' on the Internet: the case of Type 2 diabetes treatment.
    Giménez-Pérez G; Caixàs A; Giménez-Palop O; González-Clemente JM; Mauricio D
    Diabet Med; 2005 Jun; 22(6):688-92. PubMed ID: 15910617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surfing for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: perspectives on quality and content of information on the Internet.
    Stinson JN; Tucker L; Huber A; Harris H; Lin C; Cohen L; Gill N; Lukas-Bretzler J; Proulx L; Prowten D
    J Rheumatol; 2009 Aug; 36(8):1755-62. PubMed ID: 19531749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic review of online patient resources to support shared decision making for bariatric surgery.
    Musbahi A; Brown LR; Reddy A; Viswanath YKS; Rao M; Gopinath BR
    Int J Surg; 2020 Feb; 74():34-38. PubMed ID: 31883844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating the quality of internet information for breast cancer.
    Nghiem AZ; Mahmoud Y; Som R
    Breast; 2016 Feb; 25():34-7. PubMed ID: 26547835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of online health information on clubfoot using the DISCERN tool.
    Kumar VS; Subramani S; Veerapan S; Khan SA
    J Pediatr Orthop B; 2014 Mar; 23(2):135-8. PubMed ID: 24048196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation and comparison of epidural analgesia in labour related information on French and English-speaking websites.
    Espitalier F; De Lamer S; Barbaz M; Laffon M; Remérand F
    Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med; 2018 Oct; 37(5):423-428. PubMed ID: 29366975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Reliability of Bariatric Surgery Videos in YouTube Platform.
    Erdem H; Sisik A
    Obes Surg; 2018 Mar; 28(3):712-716. PubMed ID: 28875396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the reliability and quality of online uterine fibroid embolization resources.
    Kaicker J; Wu K; Athreya S
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2013 Apr; 36(2):385-94. PubMed ID: 22648699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of osteoporosis-website quality.
    Lewiecki EM; Rudolph LA; Kiebzak GM; Chavez JR; Thorpe BM
    Osteoporos Int; 2006; 17(5):741-52. PubMed ID: 16447010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.