These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
25. [Alternative cavity preparations with the use of composites and glass ionomer cements in primary Class II lesions]. Nordbø H Nor Tannlaegeforen Tid; 1987 Mar; 97(5):188-93. PubMed ID: 3475671 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Fluoride release and caries inhibition associated with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement at varying fluoride loading doses. Donly KJ; Segura A Am J Dent; 2002 Feb; 15(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 12074234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Marginal leakage of Class II glass-ionomer-silver restorations, with and without posterior composite coverage: an in vitro study. Guelmann M; Fuks AB; Holan G; Grajower R ASDC J Dent Child; 1989; 56(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 2503551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer (polyalkenoate) and silver amalgam restorations in the treatment of Class 5 caries in xerostomic head and neck cancer patients. Wood RE; Maxymiw WG; McComb D Oper Dent; 1993; 18(3):94-102. PubMed ID: 8415169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Mutans streptococci in plaque from margins of amalgam, composite, and glass-ionomer restorations. Svanberg M; Mjör IA; Orstavik D J Dent Res; 1990 Mar; 69(3):861-4. PubMed ID: 2109000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. In vitro caries-inhibitory properties of a silver cermet. Swift EJ J Dent Res; 1989 Jun; 68(6):1088-93. PubMed ID: 2509525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of antibacterial activity of glass-ionomer cement and amalgam in class two restorations by Streptococcus mutans count analysis at fixed intervals: an in vivo study. Tegginmani VS; Goel B; Uppin V; Horatti P; Kumar LS; Nainani A J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May; 14(3):381-6. PubMed ID: 24171977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]