These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2517954)

  • 21. Cuspal reinforcement in primary teeth: an in vitro comparison of three restorative materials.
    Donly KJ; Wild T; Jensen ME
    Pediatr Dent; 1988 Jun; 10(2):102-4. PubMed ID: 2978625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Secondary caries formation in vitro around fluoride-releasing restorations.
    Dionysopoulos P; Kotsanos N; Koliniotou-Koubia ; Papagodiannis Y
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(5):183-8. PubMed ID: 8700758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Surface texture and enamel-restoration interface of glass ionomer restorations.
    Sepet E; Aytepe Z; Oray H
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 9484132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Glass ionomer-silver restorations: a demineralization-remineralization concept.
    Berg JH; Donly KJ; Posnick WR
    Quintessence Int; 1988 Sep; 19(9):639-41. PubMed ID: 2978628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Alternative cavity preparations with the use of composites and glass ionomer cements in primary Class II lesions].
    Nordbø H
    Nor Tannlaegeforen Tid; 1987 Mar; 97(5):188-93. PubMed ID: 3475671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Fluoride release from glass ionomer-lined amalgam restorations.
    Olsen BT; Garcia-Godoy F; Marshall TD; Barnwell GM
    Am J Dent; 1989 Jun; 2(3):89-91. PubMed ID: 2513842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Post-treatment evaluation of fillings with Cermet cement (Ketac-Silver)].
    Hickel R; Petschelt A; Maier J; Voss A; Sauter M
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1988 Aug; 43(8):851-3. PubMed ID: 2978408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fluoride release and caries inhibition associated with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement at varying fluoride loading doses.
    Donly KJ; Segura A
    Am J Dent; 2002 Feb; 15(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 12074234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Marginal leakage of Class II glass-ionomer-silver restorations, with and without posterior composite coverage: an in vitro study.
    Guelmann M; Fuks AB; Holan G; Grajower R
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1989; 56(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 2503551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Crown-root restorations with plastic materials. Significance of mixed glass-metal cements].
    Lasfargues JJ
    Rev Odontostomatol (Paris); 1987; 16(6):403-12. PubMed ID: 2967535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
    Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Treatment of proximal caries lesions by tunnel restorations.
    Wiegand A; Attin T
    Dent Mater; 2007 Dec; 23(12):1461-7. PubMed ID: 17320944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of glass cermet cement and amalgam restorations in primary molars.
    Hickel R; Voss A
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1990; 57(3):184-8. PubMed ID: 2111833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Artificially formed caries-like lesions around Class II glass ionomer restorations in primary molars.
    Sepet E; Aytepe Z; Guven Y
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1995; 20(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 8634193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cermet cements.
    McLean JW
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1990 Jan; 120(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 2104882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer (polyalkenoate) and silver amalgam restorations in the treatment of Class 5 caries in xerostomic head and neck cancer patients.
    Wood RE; Maxymiw WG; McComb D
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(3):94-102. PubMed ID: 8415169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Mutans streptococci in plaque from margins of amalgam, composite, and glass-ionomer restorations.
    Svanberg M; Mjör IA; Orstavik D
    J Dent Res; 1990 Mar; 69(3):861-4. PubMed ID: 2109000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Cermet cements for milk tooth fillings. Preliminary results].
    Hickel R; Petschelt A; Voss A
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Jun; 44(6):444-5. PubMed ID: 2517110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In vitro caries-inhibitory properties of a silver cermet.
    Swift EJ
    J Dent Res; 1989 Jun; 68(6):1088-93. PubMed ID: 2509525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of antibacterial activity of glass-ionomer cement and amalgam in class two restorations by Streptococcus mutans count analysis at fixed intervals: an in vivo study.
    Tegginmani VS; Goel B; Uppin V; Horatti P; Kumar LS; Nainani A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May; 14(3):381-6. PubMed ID: 24171977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.