BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2517958)

  • 1. [Optical and scanning electron microscope study of gingival microleakage in Class II composite restorations].
    Navajas Rodríguez de Mondelo JM; González López S; Pérez Gutiérrez I
    Av Odontoestomatol; 1989 Dec; 5(10):701-9. PubMed ID: 2517958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
    Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Moles DR
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of different adhesive types and curing methods on microleakage and the marginal adaptation of composite veneers.
    Maleknejad F; Moosavi H; Shahriari R; Sarabi N; Shayankhah T
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 May; 10(3):18-26. PubMed ID: 19430622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents.
    Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 11572288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of different drying methods for single step adhesive systems on microleakage of tooth colored restorations.
    Owens BM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2003 Feb; 4(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 12595929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microleakage of Class II box-type composite restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Roeters JJ; Burgersdijk RC
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):160-4. PubMed ID: 10388369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microleakage of Gluma Bond, Scotchbond 2 and a glass ionomer/composite sandwich technique.
    Reeves GW; Fitchie JG; Scarbrough AR; Hembree JH
    Am J Dent; 1990 Oct; 3(5):195-8. PubMed ID: 2127533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microleakage associated with resin composite-cemented, cast glass ceramic restoration.
    Blair KF; Koeppen RG; Schwartz RS; Davis RD
    Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 8148030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Composite resin restorations: "in vitro" evaluation of three dentin adhesive systems].
    Toca E; Bonfil JJ; Pignoly C
    Inf Dent; 1991 Jun; 73(23):1865-73. PubMed ID: 1830292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of acidic primers in microleakage of Class 5 composite resin restorations.
    Gordan VV; Vargas MA; Cobb DS; Denehy GE
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(5):244-9. PubMed ID: 9863445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro microleakage of dentin adhesives.
    Sorensen JA; Dixit NV; White SN; Avera SP
    Int J Prosthodont; 1991; 4(3):213-8. PubMed ID: 1725698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Effect of bonding agents in the degree of microleakage around posterior composite resin restorations].
    Tzoutzas J; Mountouris G; Vougiouklakis G
    Odontostomatol Proodos; 1989 Aug; 43(4):323-30. PubMed ID: 2518058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of thermal and mechanical load cycling on the marginal integrity of Class II resin composite restorations.
    Davidson CL; Abdalla AI
    Am J Dent; 1993 Feb; 6(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 8329161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations.
    Belli S; Inokoshi S; Ozer F; Pereira PN; Ogata M; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 11203780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of two light-emitting diode (LED) and one halogen curing light on the microleakage of Class V flowable composite restorations.
    Attar N; Korkmaz Y
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 17277830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marginal adaptation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic veneers to Class 3 composite restorations in vitro.
    Christgau M; Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Edelmann K
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 10823069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microleakage study of different adhesive systems in Class V cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser and bur preparation.
    Ergucu Z; Celik EU; Turkun M
    Gen Dent; 2007; 55(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17333962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Class I occlusal composite resin restorations: in vivo post-operative sensitivity, wall adaptation, and microleakage.
    Opdam NJ; Feilzer AJ; Roeters JJ; Smale I
    Am J Dent; 1998 Oct; 11(5):229-34. PubMed ID: 10388382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microleakage of the Gluma system.
    Kanca J
    Am J Dent; 1990 Jun; 3(3):105-7. PubMed ID: 2127532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.