478 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25179712)
1. Laboratory evaluation of phenotypic detection methods of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Kali A; Stephen S; Umadevi S
Biomed J; 2014; 37(6):411-4. PubMed ID: 25179712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of cefoxitin disc diffusion test, oxacillin screen agar, and PCR for mecA gene for detection of MRSA.
Anand KB; Agrawal P; Kumar S; Kapila K
Indian J Med Microbiol; 2009; 27(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 19172055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Phenotypic methods for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus].
Horna G; Astocondor L; Jacobs J; García C
Rev Esp Quimioter; 2015 Apr; 28(2):98-100. PubMed ID: 25904517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Different Phenotypic Approaches To Screen and Detect
Kriegeskorte A; Idelevich EA; Schlattmann A; Layer F; Strommenger B; Denis O; Paterson GK; Holmes MA; Werner G; Becker K
J Clin Microbiol; 2018 Jan; 56(1):. PubMed ID: 28978682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. mecA-positive methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates in Zenica-Doboj Canton, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Kamberović F; Ibrahimagić A; Uzunović S; Budimir A; Rijnders MI; Stobberingh EE
J Chemother; 2015; 27(6):330-6. PubMed ID: 25112955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Evaluation of oxacillin resistance screening agar and chromogenic MRSA agar media for the detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates].
Cesur S; Yildiz E; Irmak H; Aygün Z; Karakoç E; Kinikli S; Demiröz AP
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2010 Apr; 44(2):279-84. PubMed ID: 20549963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of phenotypic methods with mecA gene based polymerase chain reaction for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus detection.
Khawaja A; Arshad F; Khan I
J Pak Med Assoc; 2020 Feb; 70(2):276-280. PubMed ID: 32063621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative analysis of phenotypic and genotypic detection of methicillin resistance among Staphylococcus aureus.
Demir T; Coplu N; Esen B
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2016; 59(3):314-7. PubMed ID: 27510667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laboratory detection methods for methicillin resistance in coagulase negative Staphylococcus isolated from ophthalmic infections.
Oliveira AD; d'Azevedo PA; de Sousa LB; Viana-Niero C; Francisco W; Lottenberg C; Martino MD; Höfling-Lima AL
Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2007; 70(4):667-75. PubMed ID: 17906764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation and comparison of tests to detect methicillin resistant S. aureus.
Mathews AA; Thomas M; Appalaraju B; Jayalakshmi J
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2010; 53(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 20090228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of a cefoxitin disk diffusion test for the routine detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Boutiba-Ben Boubaker I; Ben Abbes R; Ben Abdallah H; Mamlouk K; Mahjoubi F; Kammoun A; Hammami A; Ben Redjeb S
Clin Microbiol Infect; 2004 Aug; 10(8):762-5. PubMed ID: 15301683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical test to detect mecA and antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus aureus, based on novel biotechnological methods.
Shahmohammadi MR; Nahaei MR; Akbarzadeh A; Milani M
Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol; 2016 Sep; 44(6):1464-8. PubMed ID: 25950954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of a disk diffusion method with cefoxitin (30 microg) for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Cauwelier B; Gordts B; Descheemaecker P; Van Landuyt H
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2004 May; 23(5):389-92. PubMed ID: 15112072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of three techniques for detection of low-level methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): a disk diffusion method with cefoxitin and moxalactam, the Vitek 2 system, and the MRSA-screen latex agglutination test.
Felten A; Grandry B; Lagrange PH; Casin I
J Clin Microbiol; 2002 Aug; 40(8):2766-71. PubMed ID: 12149327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Phenotypic detection of mecC-MRSA: cefoxitin is more reliable than oxacillin.
Skov R; Larsen AR; Kearns A; Holmes M; Teale C; Edwards G; Hill R
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2014 Jan; 69(1):133-5. PubMed ID: 24038776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Detection of mecA in strains with oxacillin and cefoxitin disk tests for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus].
Lee Y; Kim CK; Kim M; Yong D; Lee K; Chong Y
Korean J Lab Med; 2007 Aug; 27(4):276-80. PubMed ID: 18094588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative evaluation of five culture media with triplex PCR assay for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Al-Talib H; Yean CY; Al-khateeb A; Singh KK; Hasan H; Al-Jashamy K; Ravichandran M
Curr Microbiol; 2010 Jul; 61(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 20033170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparison of oxacillin, cefoxitin, ceftizoxime, and moxalactam disk diffusion methods for detection of methicillin susceptibility in staphylococci].
Özel G; Aslan V; Bahar Erdem G; Çağatay M; Sencan I; Mert A
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2011 Apr; 45(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 21644068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Evaluation of the cefoxitin 30 microg disk diffusion method for detection of methicillin-resistance in selected Staphylococcus aureus isolates].
Batista N; Gutiérrez I; Lara M; Laich F; Méndez S
Rev Esp Quimioter; 2008 Dec; 21(4):213-6. PubMed ID: 19031121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multicenter evaluation of BBL CHROMagar MRSA medium for direct detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from surveillance cultures of the anterior nares.
Flayhart D; Hindler JF; Bruckner DA; Hall G; Shrestha RK; Vogel SA; Richter SS; Howard W; Walther R; Carroll KC
J Clin Microbiol; 2005 Nov; 43(11):5536-40. PubMed ID: 16272482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
