These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2518049)

  • 21. Tensile bond strength of Er,Cr:YSGG laser-irradiated human dentin and analysis of dentin-resin interface.
    Lee BS; Lin PY; Chen MH; Hsieh TT; Lin CP; Lai JY; Lan WH
    Dent Mater; 2007 May; 23(5):570-8. PubMed ID: 16820200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Adhesion to dentin.
    Yu XY; Joynt RB; Davis EL; Wieczkowski G
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1993 Jun; 21(6):23-9. PubMed ID: 7692004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dentine smear layer and bonding agents. Review: 2. Effect of cleansing regimes on the smear layer.
    Watts A; Paterson RC
    Restorative Dent; 1990 Aug; 6(3):21-5. PubMed ID: 2284465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [The influence of the chemo-mechanical removal of the smear-layer and the use of a dentin adhesive on microleakage of composite resin restorations].
    de la Macorra García JC; Gómez Martínez A; Gutiérrez Argumosa B
    Av Odontoestomatol; 1989 Feb; 5(2):68-70, 74. PubMed ID: 2699414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical implications of the smear layer in endodontics: a review.
    Torabinejad M; Handysides R; Khademi AA; Bakland LK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Dec; 94(6):658-66. PubMed ID: 12464887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Hybrid layer thickness and morphology: the influence of cavity preparation with Er:YAG laser.
    Barceleiro Mde O; de Mello JB; de Mello GS; Dias KR; de Miranda MS; Sampaio Filho HR
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(3):304-10. PubMed ID: 15986949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Can the method of primer application influence adhesion to Er:YAG-laser irradiated dentin?
    Botta SB; Vieira SN; Cordon R; Marques MM; Matos AB
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Jan; 10(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 19142256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of tissue characteristics at margins on leakage of Class II indirect porcelain restorations.
    Ferrari M; Mason PN; Fabianelli A; Cagidiaco MC; Kugel G; Davidson CL
    Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):134-42. PubMed ID: 10649936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mineral distribution and CLSM analysis of secondary caries inhibition by fluoride/MDPB-containing adhesive system after cariogenic challenges.
    de Carvalho FG; Puppin-Rontani RM; Soares LE; Santo AM; Martin AA; Nociti-Junior FH
    J Dent; 2009 Apr; 37(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 19168273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Microleakage study of different adhesive systems in Class V cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser and bur preparation.
    Ergucu Z; Celik EU; Turkun M
    Gen Dent; 2007; 55(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17333962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Ultrastructural transmission electron microscopy (TEM) study of hybrid layers formed beneath a one-bottle adhesive system using the total-etch technique and a self-etching system.
    Milia E; Santini A
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jun; 34(6):447-52. PubMed ID: 12859089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of pulpal pressure on the microtensile bond strength of luting resin cements to human dentin.
    Hiraishi N; Yiu CK; King NM; Tay FR
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 18573523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Single-step, self-etch adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerization. Part III. Evidence from fluid conductance and artificial caries inhibition.
    Itthagarun A; Tay FR; Pashley DH; Wefel JS; García-Godoy F; Wei SH
    Am J Dent; 2004 Dec; 17(6):394-400. PubMed ID: 15724748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dentin permeability: effects of crown preparation.
    Richardson D; Tao L; Pashley DH
    Int J Prosthodont; 1991; 4(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 1810312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of dental rotary instruments on the roughness and wettability of human dentin surfaces.
    Ayad MF; Johnston WM; Rosenstiel SF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Aug; 102(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 19643221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Bonding mechanism of three "one-bottle" systems to conditioned and unconditioned enamel and dentin.
    Ferrari M; Goracci G; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):224-30. PubMed ID: 9522696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dentin infiltration by three adhesive systems in clinical and laboratory conditions.
    Ferrari M; Cagidiaco MC; Kugel G; Davidson CL
    Am J Dent; 1996 Dec; 9(6):240-4. PubMed ID: 9545876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. 2-year clinical evaluation of dentin bonding systems.
    Alhadainy HA; Abdalla AI
    Am J Dent; 1996 Apr; 9(2):77-9. PubMed ID: 9522691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.