81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25180645)
21. Closing the Gap: A Resident-Led Quality Improvement Project to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening in Primary Care Community Clinics.
Ruggeri CE; Reed RE; Coyle B; Stoltzfus J; Fioravanti G; Tehrani R
J Grad Med Educ; 2020 Feb; 12(1):104-108. PubMed ID: 32089801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Monitoring and Developing a Volunteer Patient Navigation Intervention to Improve Mammography Compliance in a Safety Net Hospital.
Margulies IG; Zwillenberg J; Chadda A; Gissel H; Lettera M; Bender S; Wallack MK; Srinivasan A
J Oncol Pract; 2019 Apr; 15(4):e389-e398. PubMed ID: 30908139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Patient Navigation in Medically Underserved Areas study design: A trial with implications for efficacy, effect modification, and full continuum assessment.
Molina Y; Glassgow AE; Kim SJ; Berrios NM; Pauls H; Watson KS; Darnell JS; Calhoun EA
Contemp Clin Trials; 2017 Feb; 53():29-35. PubMed ID: 27940186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Reducing barriers to breast cancer care through Avon patient navigation programs.
Stanley S; Arriola KJ; Smith S; Hurlbert M; Ricci C; Escoffery C
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2013; 19(5):461-7. PubMed ID: 23266756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Impact of Phone-Call and Access-Enhancing Intervention on Mammography Uptake among Primary Care Patients at an Urban Safety-Net Hospital: A Randomized Controlled Study.
Nanda AD; Mann MP; Cheng AL; Moormeier J; Ahmadiyeh N
Ann Surg Oncol; 2020 Nov; 27(12):4643-4649. PubMed ID: 32696304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Feasibility of Patient Navigation to Improve Breast Cancer Care in Malaysia.
Yeoh ZY; Jaganathan M; Rajaram N; Rawat S; Tajudeen NA; Rahim N; Zainal NH; Maniam S; Suvelayutnan U; Yaacob R; Krishnapillai V; Kamal MZM; Teo SH; Wahab MYA
J Glob Oncol; 2018 Nov; 4():1-13. PubMed ID: 30398950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Assessing improvement in detection of breast cancer with three-dimensional automated breast US in women with dense breast tissue: the SomoInsight Study.
Brem RF; Tabár L; Duffy SW; Inciardi MF; Guingrich JA; Hashimoto BE; Lander MR; Lapidus RL; Peterson MK; Rapelyea JA; Roux S; Schilling KJ; Shah BA; Torrente J; Wynn RT; Miller DP
Radiology; 2015 Mar; 274(3):663-73. PubMed ID: 25329763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Workplace-based breast cancer screening intervention in china.
Ma GX; Yin L; Gao W; Tan Y; Liu R; Fang C; Ma XS
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2012 Feb; 21(2):358-67. PubMed ID: 22155948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A Community-Based Outreach Navigator Approach to Establishing Partnerships for a Safety Net Mammography Screening Center.
Wallington S; Oppong B; Dash C; Coleman T; Greenwald H; Torres T; Iddirisu M; Adams-Campbell LL
J Cancer Educ; 2018 Aug; 33(4):782-787. PubMed ID: 27995458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Enhancing mammography use in the inner city. A randomized trial of intensive case management.
Weber BE; Reilly BM
Arch Intern Med; 1997 Nov; 157(20):2345-9. PubMed ID: 9361575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Improving breast and colon cancer screening rates: a comparison of letters, automated phone calls, or both.
Phillips L; Hendren S; Humiston S; Winters P; Fiscella K
J Am Board Fam Med; 2015; 28(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 25567822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Organizational Factors Affecting the Likelihood of Cancer Screening Among VA Patients.
Chou AF; Rose DE; Farmer M; Canelo I; Yano EM
Med Care; 2015 Dec; 53(12):1040-9. PubMed ID: 26569643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Initial and repeat mammography screening in a low income multi-ethnic population in Los Angeles.
Bastani R; Kaplan CP; Maxwell AE; Nisenbaum R; Pearce J; Marcus AC
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1995 Mar; 4(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 7742724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Physician adherence to U.S. Preventive Services Task Force mammography guidelines.
Corbelli J; Borrero S; Bonnema R; McNamara M; Kraemer K; Rubio D; Karpov I; McNeil M
Womens Health Issues; 2014; 24(3):e313-9. PubMed ID: 24794545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of Patient Navigation on Patient Satisfaction Outcomes.
Post DM; McAlearney AS; Young GS; Krok-Schoen JL; Plascak JJ; Paskett ED
J Cancer Educ; 2015 Dec; 30(4):728-35. PubMed ID: 25510369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Annual mammography screening: is it necessary?
Hegar V; Oliveira K; Kakarala B; Mangram A; Dunn E
Am Surg; 2012 Jan; 78(1):104-6. PubMed ID: 22273325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Mammographic screening for breast cancer: 2010.
Margolies L
Mt Sinai J Med; 2010; 77(4):398-404. PubMed ID: 20687187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The Ohio Patient Navigation Research Program: does the American Cancer Society patient navigation model improve time to resolution in patients with abnormal screening tests?
Paskett ED; Katz ML; Post DM; Pennell ML; Young GS; Seiber EE; Harrop JP; DeGraffinreid CR; Tatum CM; Dean JA; Murray DM;
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2012 Oct; 21(10):1620-8. PubMed ID: 23045536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Expansion of screening mammography in the Veterans Health Administration: implications for breast cancer treatment.
Kvasnovsky CL; Kesmodel SB; Gragasin JL; Punnoose V; Johnson PA; Goel R; Reddy SK; Pierson RN; Jain A
JAMA Surg; 2013 Nov; 148(11):999-1004. PubMed ID: 24048217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Mammography screening: views from women and primary care physicians in Crete.
Trigoni M; Griffiths F; Tsiftsis D; Koumantakis E; Green E; Lionis C
BMC Womens Health; 2008 Nov; 8():20. PubMed ID: 18990253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
