These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
711 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25181255)
1. An Accuracy Study of Computer-Planned Implant Placement in the Augmented Maxilla Using Mucosa-Supported Surgical Templates. Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Bergé SJ; Soehardi RA; Xi T; de Haan AF; Schutyser F; Maal TJ Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 17(6):1154-63. PubMed ID: 25181255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates. Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Boumans T; de Haan AF; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 17(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 23879524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the augmented maxilla using osteosynthesis screws. Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Soehardi A; Bergé SJ; Xi T; Maal TJJ Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Apr; 46(4):511-517. PubMed ID: 27887876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A clinically relevant validation method for implant placement after virtual planning. Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Boumans T; Schutyser F; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1265-72. PubMed ID: 22905668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prosthetically driven, computer-guided implant planning for the edentulous maxilla: a model study. Katsoulis J; Pazera P; Mericske-Stern R Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):238-45. PubMed ID: 18783423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The use of first stage bone augmentation screws to stabilize the surgical template in the second stage. Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 44(6):781-4. PubMed ID: 25682461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement. Behneke A; Burwinkel M; Behneke N Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 22092586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Alternative bone expansion technique for implant placement in atrophic edentulous maxilla and mandible. Demetriades N; Park JI; Laskarides C J Oral Implantol; 2011 Aug; 37(4):463-71. PubMed ID: 20662673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study. Valente F; Schiroli G; Sbrenna A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 19492638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical accuracy of flapless computer-guided surgery for implant placement in edentulous arches. Vieira DM; Sotto-Maior BS; Barros CA; Reis ES; Francischone CE Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(5):1347-51. PubMed ID: 24066327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computed tomography-based evaluation of template (NobelGuide™)-guided implant positions: a prospective radiological study. Vasak C; Watzak G; Gahleitner A; Strbac G; Schemper M; Zechner W Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Oct; 22(10):1157-1163. PubMed ID: 21244498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of CAD/CAM-guided surgical template implant surgery on human cadavers: Part I. Pettersson A; Kero T; Gillot L; Cannas B; Fäldt J; Söderberg R; Näsström K J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jun; 103(6):334-42. PubMed ID: 20493322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability of implant placement after virtual planning of implant positions using cone beam CT data and surgical (guide) templates. Nickenig HJ; Eitner S J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2007; 35(4-5):207-11. PubMed ID: 17576068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery. Pessoa R; Siqueira R; Li J; Saleh I; Meneghetti P; Bezerra F; Wang HL; Mendonça G J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 33904640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of implant surgical guides fabricated using computer numerical control milling for edentulous jaws: a pilot clinical trial. Chai J; Liu X; Schweyen R; Setz J; Pan S; Liu J; Zhou Y BMC Oral Health; 2020 Oct; 20(1):288. PubMed ID: 33087073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In Vivo Tooth-Supported Implant Surgical Guides Fabricated With Desktop Stereolithographic Printers: Fully Guided Surgery Is More Accurate Than Partially Guided Surgery. Bencharit S; Staffen A; Yeung M; Whitley D; Laskin DM; Deeb GR J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 76(7):1431-1439. PubMed ID: 29550378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study. Arisan V; Karabuda ZC; Ozdemir T J Periodontol; 2010 Jan; 81(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 20059416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A randomized clinical trial comparing guided implant surgery (bone- or mucosa-supported) with mental navigation or the use of a pilot-drill template. Vercruyssen M; Cox C; Coucke W; Naert I; Jacobs R; Quirynen M J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Jul; 41(7):717-23. PubMed ID: 24460748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A computed tomographic scan-derived customized surgical template and fixed prosthesis for flapless surgery and immediate loading of implants in fully edentulous maxillae: a prospective multicenter study. van Steenberghe D; Glauser R; Blombäck U; Andersson M; Schutyser F; Pettersson A; Wendelhag I Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2005; 7 Suppl 1():S111-20. PubMed ID: 16137096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Implant placement accuracy when using stereolithographic template as a surgical guide: preliminary results. Al-Harbi SA; Sun AY Implant Dent; 2009 Feb; 18(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 19212237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]