These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25181374)
1. Outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hudson CO; Northington GM; Lyles RH; Karp DR Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(5):252-60. PubMed ID: 25181374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes. Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing the outcomes and effectiveness of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Chang CL; Chen CH; Chang SJ Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Feb; 33(2):297-308. PubMed ID: 33760992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-Term Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Using Lightweight Y-Mesh. Culligan PJ; Lewis C; Priestley J; Mushonga N Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2020 Mar; 26(3):202-206. PubMed ID: 31688526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Pan K; Zhang Y; Wang Y; Wang Y; Xu H Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Mar; 132(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 26797199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse. Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: guidelines for clinical practice]. Wagner L; Meurette G; Vidart A; Warembourg S; Terassa JB; Berrogain N; Ragni E; Le Normand L Prog Urol; 2016 Jul; 26 Suppl 1():S27-37. PubMed ID: 27595624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Porcine dermis compared with polypropylene mesh for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial. Culligan PJ; Salamon C; Priestley JL; Shariati A Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 121(1):143-51. PubMed ID: 23262939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tension-free vaginal mesh surgery versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: Analysis of perioperative outcomes using a Japanese national inpatient database. Obinata D; Sugihara T; Yasunaga H; Mochida J; Yamaguchi K; Murata Y; Yoshizawa T; Matsui T; Matsui H; Sasabuchi Y; Fujimura T; Homma Y; Takahashi S Int J Urol; 2018 Jul; 25(7):655-659. PubMed ID: 29729035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modified laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with mesh for severe pelvic organ prolapse. Zhu L; Sun Z; Yu M; Li B; Li X; Lang J Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2013 May; 121(2):170-2. PubMed ID: 23415023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mesh-related complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Baines G; Price N; Jefferis H; Cartwright R; Jackson SR Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Sep; 30(9):1475-1481. PubMed ID: 31041499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Short-term Outcomes of Non-robotic Single-incision Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: A Surgical Technique. Liu J; Kohn J; Wu C; Guan Z; Guan X J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(3):721-727. PubMed ID: 31146027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Serati M; Bogani G; Sorice P; Braga A; Torella M; Salvatore S; Uccella S; Cromi A; Ghezzi F Eur Urol; 2014 Aug; 66(2):303-18. PubMed ID: 24631406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating the morbidity and long-term efficacy of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with and without robotic assistance for pelvic organ prolapse. Lallemant M; Tresch C; Puyraveau M; Delplanque S; Cosson M; Ramanah R J Robot Surg; 2021 Oct; 15(5):785-792. PubMed ID: 33247428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]