These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
350 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25181581)
81. Primary stability of turned and acid-etched screw-type implants: a removal torque and histomorphometric study in rabbits. Fernandes Ede L; Unikowski IL; Teixeira ER; da Costa NP; Shinkai RS Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 18271369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
82. Comparison of implant stability by means of resonance frequency analysis for flapless and conventionally inserted implants. Katsoulis J; Avrampou M; Spycher C; Stipic M; Enkling N; Mericske-Stern R Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Dec; 14(6):915-23. PubMed ID: 21414133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
83. Observational study on primary and secondary stability of two current bone level implant designs. Steiner C; Karl M; Steiner D; Meyer B Quintessence Int; 2021; 52(3):230-235. PubMed ID: 33491395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
84. Impact of bone quality and implant type on the primary stability: an experimental study using bovine bone. Anil S; Aldosari AA J Oral Implantol; 2015 Apr; 41(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 23713963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
85. Clinical evaluation of the NobelActive implant system: a case series of 107 consecutively placed implants and a review of the implant features. Irinakis T; Wiebe C J Oral Implantol; 2009; 35(6):283-8. PubMed ID: 20017644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
86. Early detection of alterations in the resonance frequency assessment of oral implant stability on various bone types: a clinical study. Sençimen M; Gülses A; Ozen J; Dergin C; Okçu KM; Ayyıldız S; Altuğ HA J Oral Implantol; 2011 Aug; 37(4):411-9. PubMed ID: 20233069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
87. Enhancing primary implant stability by undersizing implant site preparation: A human cadaver study. Turkyilmaz I; Tozum TF J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Feb; 121(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 31055093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
88. Pilot study in the identification of stability values for determining immediate and early loading of implants. Shiigai T J Oral Implantol; 2007; 33(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 17410907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
89. Associations between cortical bone-to-implant contact and microstructure derived from CBCT and implant primary stability. Feng L; Chen H; Chen Z; Chen Y; Gu X Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Mar; 34(3):243-253. PubMed ID: 36727924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
90. Can the Bone Density Estimated by CBCT Predict the Primary Stability of Dental Implants? A New Measurement Protocol. Al-Jamal MFJ; Al-Jumaily HA J Craniofac Surg; 2021 Mar-Apr 01; 32(2):e171-e174. PubMed ID: 33705063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
91. Validation of value of actual micromotion as a direct measure of implant micromobility after healing (secondary implant stability). An in vivo histologic and biomechanical study. Trisi P; Berardini M; Falco A; Podaliri Vulpiani M Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Nov; 27(11):1423-1430. PubMed ID: 26727557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
92. Resonance frequency measurements in vivo and related surface properties of magnesium-incorporated, micropatterned and magnesium-incorporated TiUnite, Osseotite, SLA and TiOblast implants. Sul YT; Jönsson J; Yoon GS; Johansson C Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1146-55. PubMed ID: 19719742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
93. In Vitro Evaluation of the Primary Stability of Short Implants in Different Surgical Techniques. Kucukguven MB; Topaloglu G; Isıkhan SY; Tosun E; Saysel MY Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(4):700-706. PubMed ID: 32724921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
94. The Effect of Bone Density Measured by Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Implant Dimensions on the Stability of Dental Implants. Noaman AT; Bede SY J Craniofac Surg; 2022 Sep; 33(6):e553-e557. PubMed ID: 34930876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
95. Influence of surgical technique, implant shape and diameter on the primary stability in cancellous bone. Bilhan H; Geckili O; Mumcu E; Bozdag E; Sünbüloğlu E; Kutay O J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Dec; 37(12):900-7. PubMed ID: 20529176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
96. First-Order Mathematical Correlation Between Damping and Resonance Frequency Evaluating the Bone-Implant Interface. Kwon TK; Kim HY; Yang JH; Wikesjö UM; Lee J; Koo KT; Yeo IS Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1008-15. PubMed ID: 27632254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
97. Primary stability, insertion torque, and bone density of conical implants with internal hexagon: is there a relationship? Trisi P; Berardi D; Paolantonio M; Spoto G; D'Addona A; Perfetti G J Craniofac Surg; 2013 May; 24(3):841-4. PubMed ID: 23714893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
98. Tapered Implants in Dentistry: Revitalizing Concepts with Technology: A Review. Wilson TG; Miller RJ; Trushkowsky R; Dard M Adv Dent Res; 2016 Mar; 28(1):4-9. PubMed ID: 26927482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
99. Primary Stability of Cylindrical and Conical Dental Implants in Relation to Insertion Torque-A Comparative Ex Vivo Evaluation. Staedt H; Palarie V; Staedt A; Wolf JM; Lehmann KM; Ottl P; Kämmerer PW Implant Dent; 2017 Apr; 26(2):250-255. PubMed ID: 27922455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
100. In vitro comparison of primary stability of two implant designs in D3 bone. González-Serrano J; Ortega-Aranegui R; López-Quiles J Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2017 Jul; 22(4):e473-e477. PubMed ID: 28578374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]