641 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25183592)
1. The use of a long stem cemented femoral component in revision total hip replacement: a follow-up study of five to 16 years.
Te Stroet MA; Bronsema E; Rijnen WH; Gardeniers JW; Schreurs BW
Bone Joint J; 2014 Sep; 96-B(9):1207-13. PubMed ID: 25183592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fixation, survival, and dislocation of jumbo acetabular components in revision hip arthroplasty.
Lachiewicz PF; Soileau ES
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Mar; 95(6):543-8. PubMed ID: 23515989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Femoral impaction bone grafting in revision hip arthroplasty: 705 cases from the originating centre.
Wilson MJ; Hook S; Whitehouse SL; Timperley AJ; Gie GA
Bone Joint J; 2016 Dec; 98-B(12):1611-1619. PubMed ID: 27909122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Femoral component revision with use of impaction bone-grafting and a cemented polished stem. Surgical technique.
Schreurs BW; Arts JJ; Verdonschot N; Buma P; Slooff TJ; Gardeniers JW
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Sep; 88 Suppl 1 Pt 2():259-74. PubMed ID: 16951098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Femoral component revision with use of impaction bone-grafting and a cemented polished stem.
Schreurs BW; Arts JJ; Verdonschot N; Buma P; Slooff TJ; Gardeniers JW
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2005 Nov; 87(11):2499-507. PubMed ID: 16264127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The use of long cemented stems for femoral impaction grafting in revision total hip arthroplasty.
Sierra RJ; Charity J; Tsiridis E; Timperley JA; Gie GA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Jun; 90(6):1330-6. PubMed ID: 18519328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The outcome of femoral component revision arthroplasty with impaction allograft bone grafting and a cemented polished Exeter stem: A prospective cohort study of 208 revision arthroplasties with a mean follow-up of ten years.
te Stroet MA; Rijnen WH; Gardeniers JW; van Kampen A; Schreurs BW
Bone Joint J; 2015 Jun; 97-B(6):771-9. PubMed ID: 26033056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Epidemiology of periprosthetic femoral fractures in 5417 revision total hip arthroplasties: a 40-year experience.
Abdel MP; Houdek MT; Watts CD; Lewallen DG; Berry DJ
Bone Joint J; 2016 Apr; 98-B(4):468-74. PubMed ID: 27037428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Total hip arthroplasty in patients under 40 years of age and, if indicated, reconstruction of acetabular defects with bone impaction grafting].
de Kam DC; Gardeniers JW; Veth RP; Schreurs BW
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A811. PubMed ID: 20482927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Revision total hip arthroplasty using cemented collarless double-taper femoral components at a mean follow-up of 13 years (8 to 20): an update.
Solomon LB; Costi K; Kosuge D; Cordier T; McGee MA; Howie DW
Bone Joint J; 2015 Aug; 97-B(8):1038-45. PubMed ID: 26224818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long, titanium, cemented stems decreased late periprosthetic fractures and revisions in patients with severe bone loss and previous revision.
Hernigou P; Dupuys N; Delambre J; Guissou I; Poignard A; Allain J; Flouzat Lachaniette CH
Int Orthop; 2015 Apr; 39(4):639-44. PubMed ID: 25231573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Femoral impaction grafting in revision total hip arthroplasty: a follow-up of 540 hips.
Lamberton TD; Kenny PJ; Whitehouse SL; Timperley AJ; Gie GA
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1154-60. PubMed ID: 21570802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Exeter Contemporary flanged cemented acetabular component in primary total hip arthroplasty.
Maggs JL; Smeatham A; Whitehouse SL; Charity J; Timperley AJ; Gie GA
Bone Joint J; 2016 Mar; 98-B(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 26920954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High rate of fracture in the cementless modular Extrême™ (Mark I) femoral prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty: 33 cases at more than 5 years' follow-up.
Benoist J; Lambotte JC; Polard JL; Huten D
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Dec; 99(8):915-21. PubMed ID: 24211127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Thirty years of experience with instrumented femoral impaction bone grafting and a cemented polished Exeter stem : a prospective cohort study of 208 revision arthroplasties performed between 1991 and 2007.
Özdemir E; Kuijpers MFL; Visser J; Schreurs BW; Rijnen WHC
Bone Joint J; 2022 Sep; 104-B(9):1039-1046. PubMed ID: 36047023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Synergy cementless femoral stem in primary total hip arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 15 years.
De Martino I; De Santis V; D'Apolito R; Sculco PK; Cross MB; Gasparini G
Bone Joint J; 2017 Jan; 99-B(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 28053254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Uncemented or cemented revision stems? Analysis of 2,296 first-time hip revision arthroplasties performed due to aseptic loosening, reported to the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
Tyson Y; Rolfson O; Kärrholm J; Hailer NP; Mohaddes M
Acta Orthop; 2019 Oct; 90(5):421-426. PubMed ID: 31154890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Bone reconstruction, leg length discrepancy, and dislocation rate in 52 Wagner revision total hip arthroplasties at 44-month follow-up].
Boisgard S; Moreau PE; Tixier H; Levai JP
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2001 Apr; 87(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 11319426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Medium to long term follow up of a consecutive series of 604 Exeter Trauma Stem Hemiarthroplasties (ETS) for the treatment of displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures.
Raut S; Parker MJ
Injury; 2016 Mar; 47(3):721-4. PubMed ID: 26632499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A customised collared polished stem may reduce the complication rate of impaction grafting in revision hip surgery: a 12-year follow-up study.
Flecher X; Blanc G; Sainsous B; Parratte S; Argenson JN
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 May; 94(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 22529078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
