463 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25183608)
1. Organizational learning in the implementation and adoption of national electronic health records: case studies of two hospitals participating in the National Programme for Information Technology in England.
Takian A; Sheikh A; Barber N
Health Informatics J; 2014 Sep; 20(3):199-212. PubMed ID: 25183608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. We are bitter, but we are better off: case study of the implementation of an electronic health record system into a mental health hospital in England.
Takian A; Sheikh A; Barber N
BMC Health Serv Res; 2012 Dec; 12():484. PubMed ID: 23272770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Envisioning electronic health record systems as change management: the experience of an English hospital joining the National Programme for Information Technology.
Takian A
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 180():901-5. PubMed ID: 22874323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implementation and adoption of nationwide electronic health records in secondary care in England: final qualitative results from prospective national evaluation in "early adopter" hospitals.
Sheikh A; Cornford T; Barber N; Avery A; Takian A; Lichtner V; Petrakaki D; Crowe S; Marsden K; Robertson A; Morrison Z; Klecun E; Prescott R; Quinn C; Jani Y; Ficociello M; Voutsina K; Paton J; Fernando B; Jacklin A; Cresswell K
BMJ; 2011 Oct; 343():d6054. PubMed ID: 22006942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative case study investigating sociotechnical processes of change in the context of a national electronic health record implementation.
Cresswell KM; Worth A; Sheikh A
Health Informatics J; 2012 Dec; 18(4):251-70. PubMed ID: 23257056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Critical areas of national electronic health record programs-is our focus correct?
Deutsch E; Duftschmid G; Dorda W
Int J Med Inform; 2010 Mar; 79(3):211-22. PubMed ID: 20079685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Implementation of electronic medical records in hospitals: two case studies.
Ovretveit J; Scott T; Rundall TG; Shortell SM; Brommels M
Health Policy; 2007 Dec; 84(2-3):181-90. PubMed ID: 17624470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of organizational contextual factors on physicians' attitude toward adoption of Electronic Medical Records.
Abdekhoda M; Ahmadi M; Gohari M; Noruzi A
J Biomed Inform; 2015 Feb; 53():174-9. PubMed ID: 25445481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implementation and adoption of nationwide electronic health records in secondary care in England: qualitative analysis of interim results from a prospective national evaluation.
Robertson A; Cresswell K; Takian A; Petrakaki D; Crowe S; Cornford T; Barber N; Avery A; Fernando B; Jacklin A; Prescott R; Klecun E; Paton J; Lichtner V; Quinn C; Ali M; Morrison Z; Jani Y; Waring J; Marsden K; Sheikh A
BMJ; 2010 Sep; 341():c4564. PubMed ID: 20813822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Understanding key factors affecting electronic medical record implementation: a sociotechnical approach.
Cucciniello M; Lapsley I; Nasi G; Pagliari C
BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Jul; 15():268. PubMed ID: 26184405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of the adoption of electronic health records in North Carolina and South Carolina HIV systems.
Belden CM; Proeschold-Bell RJ
South Med J; 2010 Nov; 103(11):1115-8. PubMed ID: 20859247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Building a house on shifting sand: methodological considerations when evaluating the implementation and adoption of national electronic health record systems.
Takian A; Petrakaki D; Cornford T; Sheikh A; Barber N;
BMC Health Serv Res; 2012 Apr; 12():105. PubMed ID: 22545646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effectiveness of local support for the adoption of a national programme--a descriptive study.
Pearce C; Bartlett J; Mcleod A; Eustace P; Amos R; Shearer M
Inform Prim Care; 2014; 21(4):171-8. PubMed ID: 25479347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rates, levels, and determinants of electronic health record system adoption: a study of hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Aldosari B
Int J Med Inform; 2014 May; 83(5):330-42. PubMed ID: 24560609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of health information technology on quality in U.S. hospitals.
McCullough JS; Casey M; Moscovice I; Prasad S
Health Aff (Millwood); 2010 Apr; 29(4):647-54. PubMed ID: 20368594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Exploring the business case for ambulatory electronic health record system adoption.
Song PH; McAlearney AS; Robbins J; McCullough JS
J Healthc Manag; 2011; 56(3):169-80; discussion 181-2. PubMed ID: 21714372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. When the user is not the chooser: learning from stakeholder involvement in technology adoption decisions in infection control.
Ahmad R; Kyratsis Y; Holmes A
J Hosp Infect; 2012 Jul; 81(3):163-8. PubMed ID: 22633278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Safety risks associated with the lack of integration and interfacing of hospital health information technologies: a qualitative study of hospital electronic prescribing systems in England.
Cresswell KM; Mozaffar H; Lee L; Williams R; Sheikh A
BMJ Qual Saf; 2017 Jul; 26(7):530-541. PubMed ID: 27037303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Primary health care teams' experience of electronic medical record use after adoption.
Denomme LB; Terry AL; Brown JB; Thind A; Stewart M
Fam Med; 2011 Oct; 43(9):638-42. PubMed ID: 22002775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Challenges to implementing the national programme for information technology (NPfIT): a qualitative study.
Hendy J; Reeves BC; Fulop N; Hutchings A; Masseria C
BMJ; 2005 Aug; 331(7512):331-6. PubMed ID: 16081447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]