These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25183662)
1. Three-dimensional planning and use of patient-specific guides improve glenoid component position: an in vitro study. Walch G; Vezeridis PS; Boileau P; Deransart P; Chaoui J J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2015 Feb; 24(2):302-9. PubMed ID: 25183662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-dimensional preoperative planning software and a novel information transfer technology improve glenoid component positioning. Iannotti J; Baker J; Rodriguez E; Brems J; Ricchetti E; Mesiha M; Bryan J J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 May; 96(9):e71. PubMed ID: 24806017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three dimensional patient-specific guides for guide pin positioning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: An experimental study on different glenoid types. Mohammad Sadeghi M; Kececi EF; Kapicioglu M; Aralasmak A; Tezgel O; Basaran MA; Yildiz F; Bilsel K J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2022; 30(1):10225536221079432. PubMed ID: 35220811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Testing of a novel pin array guide for accurate three-dimensional glenoid component positioning. Lewis GS; Stevens NM; Armstrong AD J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2015 Dec; 24(12):1939-47. PubMed ID: 26256017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Proper benefit of a three dimensional pre-operative planning software for glenoid component positioning in total shoulder arthroplasty. Jacquot A; Gauci MO; Chaoui J; Baba M; Deransart P; Boileau P; Mole D; Walch G Int Orthop; 2018 Dec; 42(12):2897-2906. PubMed ID: 29968136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An in vitro comparison of mixed-reality navigation to traditional freehand and patient-specific instrumentation techniques for glenoid guide pin insertion during shoulder arthroplasty. Fleet CT; Gao R; Johnson JA; Athwal GS J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Nov; 33(11):2482-2492. PubMed ID: 38908464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Design and development of a computer assisted glenoid implantation technique for shoulder replacement surgery. Nguyen D; Ferreira LM; Brownhill JR; Faber KJ; Johnson JA Comput Aided Surg; 2007 May; 12(3):152-9. PubMed ID: 17538787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of three-dimensional planning on decision-making in total shoulder arthroplasty. Werner BS; Hudek R; Burkhart KJ; Gohlke F J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Aug; 26(8):1477-1483. PubMed ID: 28162884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of Preoperative Implant Placement in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. Hamilton MA; Polakovic S; Saadi P; Jones RB; Parsons IM; Cheung EV Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2015 Dec; 73 Suppl 1():S47-51. PubMed ID: 26631196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of patient-specific instruments with standard surgical instruments in determining glenoid component position: a randomized prospective clinical trial. Hendel MD; Bryan JA; Barsoum WK; Rodriguez EJ; Brems JJ; Evans PJ; Iannotti JP J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Dec; 94(23):2167-75. PubMed ID: 23224387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 3-dimensionally printed patient-specific glenoid drill guides vs. standard nonspecific instrumentation: a randomized controlled trial comparing the accuracy of glenoid component placement in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Dasari SP; Menendez ME; Espinoza Orias A; Khan ZA; Vadhera AS; Ebersole JW; White GM; Forsythe B; Cole BJ; Nicholson GP; Garrigues GE; Verma NN J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Feb; 33(2):223-233. PubMed ID: 37774830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient-specific instrument guidance of glenoid component implantation reduces inclination variability in total and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Heylen S; Van Haver A; Vuylsteke K; Declercq G; Verborgt O J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2016 Feb; 25(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 26456430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Shoulder patient-specific guide: First experience in 10 patients indicates room for improvement. Berhouet J; Rol M; Spiry C; Slimane M; Chevalier C; Favard L Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 Feb; 104(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 29246481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient-specific glenoid guides provide accuracy and reproducibility in total shoulder arthroplasty. Gauci MO; Boileau P; Baba M; Chaoui J; Walch G Bone Joint J; 2016 Aug; 98-B(8):1080-5. PubMed ID: 27482021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of mixed-reality surgical navigation for glenoid axis pin placement in shoulder arthroplasty using a cadaveric model. Sanchez-Sotelo J; Berhouet J; Chaoui J; Freehill MT; Collin P; Warner J; Walch G; Athwal GS J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 May; 33(5):1177-1184. PubMed ID: 37890765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determining glenoid component version after total shoulder arthroplasty. Mehta MP; Vogel LA; Shiu BB; Dennis ER; Petkovic D; Levine WN; Jobin CM J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Sep; 27(9):1588-1595. PubMed ID: 29759906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability analysis of glenoid component inclination measurements on postoperative radiographs and computed tomography-based 3D models in total and reversed shoulder arthroplasty patients. Van Haver A; Heylen S; Vuylsteke K; Declercq G; Verborgt O J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2016 Apr; 25(4):632-40. PubMed ID: 26652701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computer navigation leads to more accurate glenoid targeting during total shoulder arthroplasty compared with 3-dimensional preoperative planning alone. Schoch BS; Haupt E; Leonor T; Farmer KW; Wright TW; King JJ J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Nov; 29(11):2257-2263. PubMed ID: 32586595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]