174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25183915)
21. Adjacent Dental Implants Classification Based on Restorative Design.
Proussaefs P; AlHelal A; Taleb A; Kattadiyil MT
J Oral Implantol; 2017 Oct; 43(5):405-409. PubMed ID: 28628355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A Prosthesis Retention System for Full-Arch, Fixed, Implant-Supported Prosthesis.
Massad J; Wicks R; Ahuja S; Cagna DR
J Prosthodont; 2019 Apr; 28(4):e912-e916. PubMed ID: 30295369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: a critical review.
Michalakis KX; Hirayama H; Garefis PD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):719-28. PubMed ID: 14579961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-supported restorations for marginal bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lemos CA; de Souza Batista VE; Almeida DA; Santiago Júnior JF; Verri FR; Pellizzer EP
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Apr; 115(4):419-27. PubMed ID: 26589441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A photoelastic stress analysis of screw- and cement-retained implant prostheses with marginal gaps.
Lee JI; Lee Y; Kim NY; Kim YL; Cho HW
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Oct; 15(5):735-49. PubMed ID: 23927066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of different geometric changes in the dental implant abutment body on the amount of residual excess cement and retention in a cemented implant-supported prosthesis.
Negahdari R; Bohlouli S; Yazdani J; Torab A; Dizaj SM
Dent Med Probl; 2021; 58(2):207-213. PubMed ID: 34019744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Prosthetic outcome of cement-retained implant-supported fixed dental restorations: a systematic review.
Chaar MS; Att W; Strub JR
J Oral Rehabil; 2011 Sep; 38(9):697-711. PubMed ID: 21395638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Screw- versus cement-retained implant restorations: current concepts.
Lee A; Okayasu K; Wang HL
Implant Dent; 2010 Feb; 19(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 20147811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Management of a Fractured Multiunit Maxillary Implant-Supported Fixed Prosthesis with Stripped Abutment Screws Using a Hybrid Cement-Retained and Screw-Retained Design: A 5-Year Follow-Up Clinical Report.
Al Amri MD
J Prosthodont; 2016 Jun; 25(4):330-4. PubMed ID: 26713868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The effects of abutment wall height, platform size, and screw access channel filling method on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
Emms M; Tredwin CJ; Setchell DJ; Moles DR
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 17244301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of modifying the screw access channels of zirconia implant abutment on the cement flow pattern and retention of zirconia restorations.
Wadhwani C; Chung KH
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 24680357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A comparison between screw- and cement-retained implant prostheses. A literature review.
Shadid R; Sadaqa N
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Jun; 38(3):298-307. PubMed ID: 21091343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Techniques for retrievability and for registering screw access holes in cement-retained implant-supported prostheses: A scoping review of the literature.
Malpartida-Carrillo V; Tinedo-Lopez PL; Ortiz-Culca F; Guerrero ME; Amaya-Pajares SP
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Mar; 123(3):427-433. PubMed ID: 31307803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A 5-Year Retrospective Assay of Implant Treatments and Complications in Private Practice: The Restorative Complications of Single and Short-Span Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses.
Wang JH; Judge R; Bailey D
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(5):435-44. PubMed ID: 27611744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A comparison of the porcelain fracture resistance of screw-retained and cement-retained implant-supported metal-ceramic crowns.
Torrado E; Ercoli C; Al Mardini M; Graser GN; Tallents RH; Cordaro L
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jun; 91(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 15211294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Fabrication of a screw-retained restoration avoiding the facial access hole: a clinical report.
Garcia-Gazaui S; Razzoog M; Sierraalta M; Saglik B
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Nov; 114(5):621-4. PubMed ID: 26344192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A technique for locating implant abutment screws of posterior cement-retained metal-ceramic restorations with ceramic occlusal surfaces.
Schwedhelm ER; Raigrodski AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):165-7. PubMed ID: 16473092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Five-Year Retrospective Assay of Implant Treatments and Complications in Private Practice: Restorative Treatment Profiles of Single and Short-Span Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses.
Wang JH; Judge R; Bailey D
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(4):372-80. PubMed ID: 27479346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cemented-retained vs screw-retained implant restorations: an investigation on 1939 dental implants.
Cicciù M; Beretta M; Risitano G; Maiorana C
Minerva Stomatol; 2008 Apr; 57(4):167-79. PubMed ID: 18427361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Clinical observation of the curative effect after 5-year follow-up of single tooth implant-supported restorations in the posterior region].
Liang F; Wu MJ; Zou LD
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2021 Oct; 53(5):970-976. PubMed ID: 34650304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
