These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25184367)

  • 21. What makes a 'successful' collaborative research project between public health practitioners and academics? A mixed-methods review of funding applications submitted to a local intervention evaluation scheme.
    van der Graaf P; Blank L; Holding E; Goyder E
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2021 Jan; 19(1):9. PubMed ID: 33472643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. NIH peer review of grant applications for clinical research.
    Kotchen TA; Lindquist T; Malik K; Ehrenfeld E
    JAMA; 2004 Feb; 291(7):836-43. PubMed ID: 14970062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Analysis of the distribution and scholarly output from National Institute of Academic Anaesthesia (NIAA) research grants.
    El-Boghdadly K; Docherty AB; Klein AA
    Anaesthesia; 2018 Jun; 73(6):679-691. PubMed ID: 29603729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A retrospective study investigating requests for self-citation during open peer review in a general medicine journal.
    Peebles E; Scandlyn M; Hesp BR
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0237804. PubMed ID: 32817699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Association of percentile ranking with citation impact and productivity in a large cohort of de novo NIMH-funded R01 grants.
    Doyle JM; Quinn K; Bodenstein YA; Wu CO; Danthi N; Lauer MS
    Mol Psychiatry; 2015 Sep; 20(9):1030-6. PubMed ID: 26033238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Peer review for improving the quality of grant applications.
    Demicheli V; Di Pietrantonj C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Apr; 2007(2):MR000003. PubMed ID: 17443627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Scholarly investigation into otitis media: who is receiving funding support from the National Institutes of Health?
    Hojjat H; Johnson AP; Svider PF; Hong RS; Zuliani G; Folbe AJ; Shkoukani MA
    Laryngoscope; 2015 Jul; 125(7):1708-14. PubMed ID: 25684148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Research funding. Big names or big ideas: do peer-review panels select the best science proposals?
    Li D; Agha L
    Science; 2015 Apr; 348(6233):434-8. PubMed ID: 25908820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Foundation Research and Fellowship Awards: A 26-Year Review at Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard School of Dental Medicine.
    Inverso G; Chuang SK; Kaban LB
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Feb; 74(2):234-8. PubMed ID: 26343762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Peering at peer review revealed high degree of chance associated with funding of grant applications.
    Mayo NE; Brophy J; Goldberg MS; Klein MB; Miller S; Platt RW; Ritchie J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 59(8):842-8. PubMed ID: 16828678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. NHMRC grant applications: a comparison of "track record" scores allocated by grant assessors with bibliometric analysis of publications.
    Nicol MB; Henadeera K; Butler L
    Med J Aust; 2007 Sep; 187(6):348-52. PubMed ID: 17874983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Robotic-assisted versus standard unicompartmental knee arthroplasty-evaluation of manuscript conflict of interests, funding, scientific quality and bibliometrics.
    Cavinatto L; Bronson MJ; Chen DD; Moucha CS
    Int Orthop; 2019 Aug; 43(8):1865-1871. PubMed ID: 30291391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Peer Review Practices for Evaluating Biomedical Research Grants: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.
    Liaw L; Freedman JE; Becker LB; Mehta NN; Liscum L;
    Circ Res; 2017 Aug; 121(4):e9-e19. PubMed ID: 28684631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Using peer review to improve research and promote collaboration.
    Kupfer DJ; Murphree AN; Pilkonis PA; Cameron JL; Giang RT; Dodds NE; Godard KA; Lewis DA
    Acad Psychiatry; 2014 Feb; 38(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 24449224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [From the Cochrane Library: the use of peer review is still under discussion].
    Stijntjes F; Veeken H
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Apr; 152(16):934-7. PubMed ID: 18561790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Structure and process of federal funding for AD research.
    Wells N; Hurley AC
    Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord; 1999; 13 Suppl 1():S117-9. PubMed ID: 10369531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Impact of funding allocation on physical therapist research productivity and DPT student graduates: an analysis using panel data.
    Dickson T; Chen PD; Taylor B
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2019 May; 24(2):269-285. PubMed ID: 30426324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A snapshot of translational research funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH): A case study using behavioral and social science research awards and Clinical and Translational Science Awards funded publications.
    Han X; Williams SR; Zuckerman BL
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0196545. PubMed ID: 29742129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Are We Spending Wisely? Impact of POSNA Grants on Scholarly Productivity and Future Funding Success.
    Nhan DT; Schoenecker JG; Larson AN; Sponseller PD
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2019 Jan; 39(1):e82-e86. PubMed ID: 30260922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Research progress in muscle-derived stem cells: Literature retrieval results based on international database.
    Zhang L; Wang W
    Neural Regen Res; 2012 Apr; 7(10):784-91. PubMed ID: 25737703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.