These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25185230)

  • 1. Identifying key features of effective active learning: the effects of writing and peer discussion.
    Linton DL; Pangle WM; Wyatt KH; Powell KN; Sherwood RE
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2014; 13(3):469-77. PubMed ID: 25185230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Writing Assignments with a Metacognitive Component Enhance Learning in a Large Introductory Biology Course.
    Mynlieff M; Manogaran AL; St Maurice M; Eddinger TJ
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2014; 13(2):311-21. PubMed ID: 26086661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is Peer Interaction Necessary for Optimal Active Learning?
    Linton DL; Farmer JK; Peterson E
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2014; 13(2):243-52. PubMed ID: 26086656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implementation of Hybrid Learning in Biosignal Measurement and Instrumentation Course to Improve Student Outcomes.
    Setiawan AW
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():4190-4193. PubMed ID: 31946793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prescribed active learning increases performance in introductory biology.
    Freeman S; O'Connor E; Parks JW; Cunningham M; Hurley D; Haak D; Dirks C; Wenderoth MP
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2007; 6(2):132-9. PubMed ID: 17548875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combining peer discussion with instructor explanation increases student learning from in-class concept questions.
    Smith MK; Wood WB; Krauter K; Knight JK
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2011; 10(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 21364100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Problem-based writing with peer review improves academic performance in physiology.
    Pelaez NJ
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2002 Dec; 26(1-4):174-84. PubMed ID: 12189125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cues Matter: Learning Assistants Influence Introductory Biology Student Interactions during Clicker-Question Discussions.
    Knight JK; Wise SB; Rentsch J; Furtak EM
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2015; 14(4):ar41. PubMed ID: 26590204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Increased course structure improves performance in introductory biology.
    Freeman S; Haak D; Wenderoth MP
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2011; 10(2):175-86. PubMed ID: 21633066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving Academic Performance, Belonging, and Retention through Increasing Structure of an Introductory Biology Course.
    Wilton M; Gonzalez-Niño E; McPartlan P; Terner Z; Christoffersen RE; Rothman JH
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2019 Dec; 18(4):ar53. PubMed ID: 31675276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implementation of a Flipped Active-Learning Approach in a Community College General Biology Course Improves Student Performance in Subsequent Biology Courses and Increases Graduation Rate.
    Riedl A; Yeung F; Burke T
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2021 Jun; 20(2):ar30. PubMed ID: 33914598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peer learning and support of technology in an undergraduate biology course to enhance deep learning.
    Tsaushu M; Tal T; Sagy O; Kali Y; Gepstein S; Zilberstein D
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2012; 11(4):402-12. PubMed ID: 23222836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Doing peer review and receiving feedback: impact on scientific literacy and writing skills.
    Geithner CA; Pollastro AN
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2016 Mar; 40(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 26847256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Facilitating learning in large lecture classes: testing the "teaching team" approach to peer learning.
    Stanger-Hall KF; Lang S; Maas M
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2010; 9(4):489-503. PubMed ID: 21123696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Team-based learning versus traditional didactic lectures in teaching clinical biochemistry at King Abdulaziz University; learning outcomes and student satisfaction.
    Alamoudi AA; Al Shawwa LA; Gad H; Tekian A
    Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2021 Jul; 49(4):546-559. PubMed ID: 33729707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Training Medical Students to Create and Collaboratively Review Multiple-Choice Questions: A Comprehensive Workshop.
    Kurtz J; Holman B; Monrad SU
    MedEdPORTAL; 2020 Oct; 16():10986. PubMed ID: 33083537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Association Between Dental Student-Developed Exam Questions and Learning at Higher Cognitive Levels.
    Gonzalez-Cabezas C; Anderson OS; Wright MC; Fontana M
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Nov; 79(11):1295-304. PubMed ID: 26522634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Creating assessments as an active learning strategy: what are students' perceptions? A mixed methods study.
    Kurtz JB; Lourie MA; Holman EE; Grob KL; Monrad SU
    Med Educ Online; 2019 Dec; 24(1):1630239. PubMed ID: 31248355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Promoting an active form of learning out-of-class via answering online "study questions" leads to higher than expected exam scores in General Biology.
    Gibson SI
    PeerJ; 2015; 3():e1322. PubMed ID: 26500828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A SCALE-UP Mock-Up: Comparison of Student Learning Gains in High- and Low-Tech Active-Learning Environments.
    Soneral PA; Wyse SA
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2017; 16(1):. PubMed ID: 28213582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.