BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

375 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25186116)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness of annual versus biennial screening mammography for women with high mammographic breast density.
    Pataky R; Ismail Z; Coldman AJ; Elwood M; Gelmon K; Hedden L; Hislop G; Kan L; McCoy B; Olivotto IA; Peacock S
    J Med Screen; 2014 Dec; 21(4):180-8. PubMed ID: 25186116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of MRI for breast cancer screening in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.
    Pataky R; Armstrong L; Chia S; Coldman AJ; Kim-Sing C; McGillivray B; Scott J; Wilson CM; Peacock S
    BMC Cancer; 2013 Jul; 13():339. PubMed ID: 23837641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incorporating Baseline Breast Density When Screening Women at Average Risk for Breast Cancer : A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
    Shih YT; Dong W; Xu Y; Etzioni R; Shen Y
    Ann Intern Med; 2021 May; 174(5):602-612. PubMed ID: 33556275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness of MRI compared to mammography for breast cancer screening in a high risk population.
    Moore SG; Shenoy PJ; Fanucchi L; Tumeh JW; Flowers CR
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2009 Jan; 9():9. PubMed ID: 19144138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of Updated Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines for Average-Risk Women.
    Tina Shih YC; Dong W; Xu Y; Shen Y
    Value Health; 2019 Feb; 22(2):185-193. PubMed ID: 30711063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefits and cost-effectiveness.
    Schousboe JT; Kerlikowske K; Loh A; Cummings SR
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 21727289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The cost-effectiveness of digital breast tomosynthesis in a population breast cancer screening program.
    Wang J; Phi XA; Greuter MJW; Daszczuk AM; Feenstra TL; Pijnappel RM; Vermeulen KM; Buls N; Houssami N; Lu W; de Bock GH
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Oct; 30(10):5437-5445. PubMed ID: 32382844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Total cost-effectiveness of mammography screening strategies.
    Mittmann N; Stout NK; Lee P; Tosteson AN; Trentham-Dietz A; Alagoz O; Yaffe MJ
    Health Rep; 2015 Dec; 26(12):16-25. PubMed ID: 26676235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Long-Term Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of Organized versus Opportunistic Screening for Breast Cancer in Austria.
    Schiller-Fruehwirth I; Jahn B; Einzinger P; Zauner G; Urach C; Siebert U
    Value Health; 2017 Sep; 20(8):1048-1057. PubMed ID: 28964436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts.
    Sprague BL; Stout NK; Schechter C; van Ravesteyn NT; Cevik M; Alagoz O; Lee CI; van den Broek JJ; Miglioretti DL; Mandelblatt JS; de Koning HJ; Kerlikowske K; Lehman CD; Tosteson AN
    Ann Intern Med; 2015 Feb; 162(3):157-66. PubMed ID: 25486550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography screening before the age of 50 in The Netherlands.
    Sankatsing VD; Heijnsdijk EA; van Luijt PA; van Ravesteyn NT; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
    Int J Cancer; 2015 Oct; 137(8):1990-9. PubMed ID: 25895135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative effectiveness of combined digital mammography and tomosynthesis screening for women with dense breasts.
    Lee CI; Cevik M; Alagoz O; Sprague BL; Tosteson AN; Miglioretti DL; Kerlikowske K; Stout NK; Jarvik JG; Ramsey SD; Lehman CD
    Radiology; 2015 Mar; 274(3):772-80. PubMed ID: 25350548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Should women with a BRCA1/2 mutation aged 60 and older be offered intensified breast cancer screening? - A cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Phi XA; Greuter MJW; Obdeijn IM; Oosterwijk JC; Feenstra TL; Houssami N; de Bock GH
    Breast; 2019 Jun; 45():82-88. PubMed ID: 30904701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tailoring Breast Cancer Screening Intervals by Breast Density and Risk for Women Aged 50 Years or Older: Collaborative Modeling of Screening Outcomes.
    Trentham-Dietz A; Kerlikowske K; Stout NK; Miglioretti DL; Schechter CB; Ergun MA; van den Broek JJ; Alagoz O; Sprague BL; van Ravesteyn NT; Near AM; Gangnon RE; Hampton JM; Chandler Y; de Koning HJ; Mandelblatt JS; Tosteson AN;
    Ann Intern Med; 2016 Nov; 165(10):700-712. PubMed ID: 27548583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Cost-effectiveness of an organized breast cancer screening program in Southern Brazil].
    Ribeiro RA; Caleffi M; Polanczyk CA
    Cad Saude Publica; 2013 Nov; 29 Suppl 1():S131-45. PubMed ID: 25402242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The cost-effectiveness of adding tomosynthesis to mammography-based breast cancer screening: an economic analysis.
    Cressman S; Mar C; Sam J; Kan L; Lohrisch C; Spinelli JJ
    CMAJ Open; 2021; 9(2):E443-E450. PubMed ID: 33888549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-effectiveness of risk-based breast cancer screening programme, China.
    Sun L; Legood R; Sadique Z; Dos-Santos-Silva I; Yang L
    Bull World Health Organ; 2018 Aug; 96(8):568-577. PubMed ID: 30104797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening With Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Women at Familial Risk.
    Geuzinge HA; Obdeijn IM; Rutgers EJT; Saadatmand S; Mann RM; Oosterwijk JC; Tollenaar RAEM; de Roy van Zuidewijn DBW; Lobbes MBI; van 't Riet M; Hooning MJ; Ausems MGEM; Loo CE; Wesseling J; Luiten EJT; Zonderland HM; Verhoef C; Heijnsdijk EAM; Tilanus-Linthorst MMA; de Koning HJ;
    JAMA Oncol; 2020 Sep; 6(9):1381-1389. PubMed ID: 32729887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Cost-effectiveness of multiple screening modalities on breast cancer in Chinese women from Shanghai].
    Wu F; Mo M; Qin XX; Fang H; Zhao GM; Liu GY; Chen YY; Cao ZG; Yan YJ; Lyu LL; Xu WH; Shao ZM
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Dec; 38(12):1665-1671. PubMed ID: 29294584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Benefits, harms, and costs for breast cancer screening after US implementation of digital mammography.
    Stout NK; Lee SJ; Schechter CB; Kerlikowske K; Alagoz O; Berry D; Buist DS; Cevik M; Chisholm G; de Koning HJ; Huang H; Hubbard RA; Miglioretti DL; Munsell MF; Trentham-Dietz A; van Ravesteyn NT; Tosteson AN; Mandelblatt JS
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2014 Jun; 106(6):dju092. PubMed ID: 24872543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.