These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25186375)

  • 1. Radiation dosimetry in digital breast tomosynthesis: report of AAPM Tomosynthesis Subcommittee Task Group 223.
    Sechopoulos I; Sabol JM; Berglund J; Bolch WE; Brateman L; Christodoulou E; Flynn M; Geiser W; Goodsitt M; Jones AK; Lo JY; Maidment AD; Nishino K; Nosratieh A; Ren B; Segars WP; Von Tiedemann M
    Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091501. PubMed ID: 25186375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monte Carlo simulation for the estimation of the glandular breast dose for a digital breast tomosynthesis system.
    Rodrigues L; Magalhaes LA; Braz D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Dec; 167(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 25480841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computation of the glandular radiation dose in digital tomosynthesis of the breast.
    Sechopoulos I; Suryanarayanan S; Vedantham S; D'Orsi C; Karellas A
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):221-32. PubMed ID: 17278508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dosimetric characterization and organ dose assessment in digital breast tomosynthesis: Measurements and Monte Carlo simulations using voxel phantoms.
    Baptista M; Di Maria S; Barros S; Figueira C; Sarmento M; Orvalho L; Vaz P
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3788-800. PubMed ID: 26133581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determination of backscatter factors in breast tomosynthesis using MCNPX simulations and measurements.
    Baptista M; Di Maria S; Figueira C; Orvalho L; Vaz P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):325-30. PubMed ID: 25836681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal photon energy comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and mammography: a case study.
    Di Maria S; Baptista M; Felix M; Oliveira N; Matela N; Janeiro L; Vaz P; Orvalho L; Silva A
    Phys Med; 2014 Jun; 30(4):482-8. PubMed ID: 24613514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scatter radiation in digital tomosynthesis of the breast.
    Sechopoulos I; Suryanarayanan S; Vedantham S; D'Orsi CJ; Karellas A
    Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):564-76. PubMed ID: 17388174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Case for Wide-Angle Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Samei E; Thompson J; Richard S; Bowsher J
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Jul; 22(7):860-9. PubMed ID: 25920335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. INDIVIDUALISED CALCULATION OF TISSUE IMPARTED ENERGY IN BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS.
    Geeraert N; Klausz R; Muller S; Bloch I; Bosmans H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):267-73. PubMed ID: 27127209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical digital breast tomosynthesis system: dosimetric characterization.
    Feng SS; Sechopoulos I
    Radiology; 2012 Apr; 263(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 22332070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Normalized glandular dose coefficients for digital breast tomosynthesis systems with a homogeneous breast model.
    Sarno A; Tucciariello RM; Mettivier G; Del Sarto D; Fantacci ME; Russo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2021 Mar; 66(6):065024. PubMed ID: 33535193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cancer risk estimation in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis using GEANT4 Monte Carlo simulations and voxel phantoms.
    Ferreira P; Baptista M; Di Maria S; Vaz P
    Phys Med; 2016 May; 32(5):717-23. PubMed ID: 27133140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging.
    Gong X; Glick SJ; Liu B; Vedula AA; Thacker S
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1041-52. PubMed ID: 16696481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of the glandular composition on digital breast tomosynthesis image quality and dose optimisation.
    Marques T; Ribeiro A; Di Maria S; Belchior A; Cardoso J; Matela N; Oliveira N; Janeiro L; Almeida P; Vaz P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):337-41. PubMed ID: 25836692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for flat-panel CT breast imaging.
    Thacker SC; Glick SJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Dec; 49(24):5433-44. PubMed ID: 15724534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Applicability of ACR breast dosimetry methodology to a digital mammography system.
    Tomon JJ; Johnson TE; Swenson KN; Schauer DA
    Med Phys; 2006 Mar; 33(3):799-807. PubMed ID: 16878582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Average glandular dose in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of phantom and patient data.
    Bouwman RW; van Engen RE; Young KC; den Heeten GJ; Broeders MJ; Schopphoven S; Jeukens CR; Veldkamp WJ; Dance DR
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Oct; 60(20):7893-907. PubMed ID: 26407015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Digital breast tomosynthesis].
    Preibsch H; Siegmann-Luz KC
    Radiologe; 2015 Jan; 55(1):59-67; quiz 68-70. PubMed ID: 25609581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monte Carlo study on optimal breast voxel resolution for dosimetry estimates in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Fedon C; Rabin C; Caballo M; Diaz O; García E; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; González-Sprinberg GA; Sechopoulos I
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Dec; 64(1):015003. PubMed ID: 30524034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fully iterative scatter corrected digital breast tomosynthesis using GPU-based fast Monte Carlo simulation and composition ratio update.
    Kim K; Lee T; Seong Y; Lee J; Jang KE; Choi J; Choi YW; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Cho S; Ye JC
    Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5342-55. PubMed ID: 26328983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.