BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1002 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25186389)

  • 1. Amorphous In-Ga-Zn-O thin-film transistor active pixel sensor x-ray imager for digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Zhao C; Kanicki J
    Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091902. PubMed ID: 25186389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cascaded systems analysis of a-Se/a-Si and a-InGaZnO TFT passive and active pixel sensors for tomosynthesis.
    Sengupta A; Zhao C; Konstantinidis A; Kanicki J
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 64(2):025012. PubMed ID: 30523916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Large area CMOS active pixel sensor x-ray imager for digital breast tomosynthesis: Analysis, modeling, and characterization.
    Zhao C; Kanicki J; Konstantinidis AC; Patel T
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6294-308. PubMed ID: 26520722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-dimensional cascaded system analysis of a 50 µm pixel pitch wafer-scale CMOS active pixel sensor x-ray detector for digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Zhao C; Vassiljev N; Konstantinidis AC; Speller RD; Kanicki J
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(5):1994-2017. PubMed ID: 28072394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Theoretical investigation of the noise performance of active pixel imaging arrays based on polycrystalline silicon thin film transistors.
    Koniczek M; Antonuk LE; El-Mohri Y; Liang AK; Zhao Q
    Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3491-3503. PubMed ID: 28376261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 50 μm pixel pitch wafer-scale CMOS active pixel sensor x-ray detector for digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Zhao C; Konstantinidis AC; Zheng Y; Anaxagoras T; Speller RD; Kanicki J
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Dec; 60(23):8977-9001. PubMed ID: 26540090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance of a high fill factor, indirect detection prototype flat-panel imager for mammography.
    El-Mohri Y; Antonuk LE; Zhao Q; Wang Y; Li Y; Du H; Sawant A
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):315-27. PubMed ID: 17278517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Technical assessment of 2D and 3D imaging performance of an IGZO-based flat-panel X-ray detector.
    Sheth NM; Uneri A; Helm PA; Zbijewski W; Siewerdsen JH
    Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):3053-3066. PubMed ID: 35363391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Toward Scintillator High-Gain Avalanche Rushing Photoconductor Active Matrix Flat Panel Imager (SHARP-AMFPI): Initial fabrication and characterization.
    Scheuermann JR; Howansky A; Hansroul M; Léveillé S; Tanioka K; Zhao W
    Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):794-802. PubMed ID: 29171067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Full breast digital mammography with an amorphous silicon-based flat panel detector: physical characteristics of a clinical prototype.
    Vedantham S; Karellas A; Suryanarayanan S; Albagli D; Han S; Tkaczyk EJ; Landberg CE; Opsahl-Ong B; Granfors PR; Levis I; D'Orsi CJ; Hendrick RE
    Med Phys; 2000 Mar; 27(3):558-67. PubMed ID: 10757607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Empirical electro-optical and x-ray performance evaluation of CMOS active pixels sensor for low dose, high resolution x-ray medical imaging.
    Arvanitis CD; Bohndiek SE; Royle G; Blue A; Liang HX; Clark A; Prydderch M; Turchetta R; Speller R
    Med Phys; 2007 Dec; 34(12):4612-25. PubMed ID: 18196789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. System performance of a prototype flat-panel imager operated under mammographic conditions.
    Jee KW; Antonuk LE; El-Mohri Y; Zhao Q
    Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1874-90. PubMed ID: 12906206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of amorphous selenium detector thickness on dual-energy digital breast imaging.
    Hu YH; Zhao W
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111904. PubMed ID: 25370637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimization of phosphor-based detector design for oblique x-ray incidence in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Acciavatti RJ; Maidment AD
    Med Phys; 2011 Nov; 38(11):6188. PubMed ID: 22047384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Signal and noise transfer properties of CMOS based active pixel flat panel imager coupled to structured CsI:Tl.
    Arvanitis CD; Bohndiek SE; Blakesley J; Olivo A; Speller RD
    Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 36(1):116-26. PubMed ID: 19235380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A real-time flat-panel X-ray pixel imaging system for low-dose medical diagnostics and craniofacial applications.
    Chapuy S; Dimcovski D; Dimcovski Z; Grigoriev E; Grob E; Ligier Y; Pachoud M; Riondel F; Rüfenacht D; Sayegh C; Terrier F; Valley JF; Verdun FR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2000 Jan; 11(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 11314093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Segmented crystalline scintillators: empirical and theoretical investigation of a high quantum efficiency EPID based on an initial engineering prototype CsI(TI) detector.
    Sawant A; Antonuk LE; El-Mohri Y; Zhao Q; Wang Y; Li Y; Du H; Perna L
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1053-66. PubMed ID: 16696482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
    Boyce SJ; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Study of a prototype high quantum efficiency thick scintillation crystal video-electronic portal imaging device.
    Samant SS; Gopal A
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2783-91. PubMed ID: 16964854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Empirical and theoretical investigation of the noise performance of indirect detection, active matrix flat-panel imagers (AMFPIs) for diagnostic radiology.
    Siewerdsen JH; Antonuk LE; el-Mohri Y; Yorkston J; Huang W; Boudry JM; Cunningham IA
    Med Phys; 1997 Jan; 24(1):71-89. PubMed ID: 9029542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 51.