These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
791 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25186412)
21. The impact of image reconstruction bias on PET/CT 90Y dosimetry after radioembolization. Tapp KN; Lea WB; Johnson MS; Tann M; Fletcher JW; Hutchins GD J Nucl Med; 2014 Sep; 55(9):1452-8. PubMed ID: 24982437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The origin and reduction of spurious extrahepatic counts observed in Walrand S; Hesse M; Jamar F; Lhommel R Phys Med Biol; 2018 Mar; 63(7):075016. PubMed ID: 29513273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Performance of Philips Gemini TF PET/CT scanner with special consideration for its time-of-flight imaging capabilities. Surti S; Kuhn A; Werner ME; Perkins AE; Kolthammer J; Karp JS J Nucl Med; 2007 Mar; 48(3):471-80. PubMed ID: 17332626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Brain PET imaging optimization with time of flight and point spread function modelling. Prieto E; Martí-Climent JM; Morán V; Sancho L; Barbés B; Arbizu J; Richter JA Phys Med; 2015 Dec; 31(8):948-955. PubMed ID: 26249138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Monte Carlo simulation of PET and SPECT imaging of 90Y. Takahashi A; Himuro K; Yamashita Y; Komiya I; Baba S; Sasaki M Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1926-35. PubMed ID: 25832083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Partition Model-Based 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT Predictive Dosimetry Compared with 90Y TOF PET/CT Posttreatment Dosimetry in Radioembolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Quantitative Agreement Comparison. Gnesin S; Canetti L; Adib S; Cherbuin N; Silva Monteiro M; Bize P; Denys A; Prior JO; Baechler S; Boubaker A J Nucl Med; 2016 Nov; 57(11):1672-1678. PubMed ID: 27307346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A Microdosimetric Analysis of Absorbed Dose to Tumor as a Function of Number of Microspheres per Unit Volume in 90Y Radioembolization. Pasciak AS; Bourgeois AC; Bradley YC J Nucl Med; 2016 Jul; 57(7):1020-6. PubMed ID: 26912424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Assessment of acquisition protocols for routine imaging of Y-90 using PET/CT. Carlier T; Eugène T; Bodet-Milin C; Garin E; Ansquer C; Rousseau C; Ferrer L; Barbet J; Schoenahl F; Kraeber-Bodéré F EJNMMI Res; 2013 Feb; 3(1):11. PubMed ID: 23414629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Predictive Value of 99mTc-MAA SPECT for 90Y-Labeled Resin Microsphere Distribution in Radioembolization of Primary and Secondary Hepatic Tumors. Ilhan H; Goritschan A; Paprottka P; Jakobs TF; Fendler WP; Todica A; Bartenstein P; Hacker M; Haug AR J Nucl Med; 2015 Nov; 56(11):1654-60. PubMed ID: 26315830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. (90)Y-PET/CT Imaging Quantification for Dosimetry in Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy: Analysis and Corrections of the Impairing Factors. Fabbri C; Bartolomei M; Mattone V; Casi M; De Lauro F; Bartolini N; Gentili G; Amadori S; Agostini M; Sarti G Cancer Biother Radiopharm; 2015 Jun; 30(5):200-10. PubMed ID: 25860616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Performance measurement of PSF modeling reconstruction (True X) on Siemens Biograph TruePoint TrueV PET/CT. Lee YS; Kim JS; Kim KM; Kang JH; Lim SM; Kim HJ Ann Nucl Med; 2014 May; 28(4):340-8. PubMed ID: 24504938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Impact of image reconstruction method on dose distributions derived from Hou X; Ma H; Esquinas PL; Uribe C; Tolhurst S; Bénard F; Liu D; Rahmim A; Celler A Phys Med Biol; 2020 Nov; 65(21):215022. PubMed ID: 33245057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Image-guided personalized predictive dosimetry by artery-specific SPECT/CT partition modeling for safe and effective 90Y radioembolization. Kao YH; Hock Tan AE; Burgmans MC; Irani FG; Khoo LS; Gong Lo RH; Tay KH; Tan BS; Hoe Chow PK; Eng Ng DC; Whatt Goh AS J Nucl Med; 2012 Apr; 53(4):559-66. PubMed ID: 22343503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Systematic and random errors of PET-based Siman W; Mawlawi OR; Mourtada F; Kappadath SC Med Phys; 2020 Jun; 47(6):2441-2449. PubMed ID: 32135025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A gate evaluation of the sources of error in quantitative Strydhorst J; Carlier T; Dieudonné A; Conti M; Buvat I Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5320-5329. PubMed ID: 28105711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Radioembolization with Ho CL; Chen S; Cheung SK; Leung YL; Cheng KC; Wong KN; Wong YH; Leung TWT Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Nov; 45(12):2110-2121. PubMed ID: 29948107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of PMT-based TF64 and SiPM-based Vereos PET/CT systems for Trotta N; Collette B; Mathey C; Vierasu I; Bucalau AM; Verset G; Moreno-Reyes R; Goldman S Med Phys; 2022 Dec; 49(12):7567-7582. PubMed ID: 35894818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prediction of tumor response and patient outcome after radioembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma using 90Y-PET-computed tomography dosimetry. d'Abadie P; Walrand S; Hesse M; Annet L; Borbath I; Van den Eynde M; Lhommel R; Jamar F Nucl Med Commun; 2021 Jul; 42(7):747-754. PubMed ID: 33741864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]