These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25186758)
21. Improved perception of speech in noise and Mandarin tones with acoustic simulations of harmonic coding for cochlear implants. Li X; Nie K; Imennov NS; Won JH; Drennan WR; Rubinstein JT; Atlas LE J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):3387-98. PubMed ID: 23145619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Binaural sensitivity to temporal fine structure and lateralization ability in children with suspected (central) auditory processing disorder. Lotfi Y; Ahmadi T; Moossavi A; Bakhshi E Auris Nasus Larynx; 2019 Feb; 46(1):64-69. PubMed ID: 29954636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Consonant identification in noise using Hilbert-transform temporal fine-structure speech and recovered-envelope speech for listeners with normal and impaired hearing. Léger AC; Reed CM; Desloge JG; Swaminathan J; Braida LD J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):389-403. PubMed ID: 26233038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Neural representation of interaural correlation in human auditory brainstem: Comparisons between temporal-fine structure and envelope. Wang Q; Lu H; Wu Z; Li L Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():165-173. PubMed ID: 29853322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The effects of the addition of low-level, low-noise noise on the intelligibility of sentences processed to remove temporal envelope information. Hopkins K; Moore BC; Stone MA J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):2150-61. PubMed ID: 20968385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. What is temporal fine structure and why is it important? Moon IJ; Hong SH Korean J Audiol; 2014 Apr; 18(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 24782944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Level considerations for chimeric processing: Temporal envelope and fine structure contributions to speech intelligibility. Fogerty D; Entwistle JL J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Nov; 138(5):EL459-64. PubMed ID: 26627814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effects of lowpass and highpass filtering on the intelligibility of speech based on temporal fine structure or envelope cues. Ardoint M; Lorenzi C Hear Res; 2010 Feb; 260(1-2):89-95. PubMed ID: 19963053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise: hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners. Summers V; Makashay MJ; Theodoroff SM; Leek MR J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):274-92. PubMed ID: 23636209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Failure of the precedence effect with a noise-band vocoder. Seeber BU; Hafter ER J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Mar; 129(3):1509-21. PubMed ID: 21428515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The role of recovered envelope cues in the identification of temporal-fine-structure speech for hearing-impaired listeners. Léger AC; Desloge JG; Braida LD; Swaminathan J J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jan; 137(1):505-8. PubMed ID: 25618081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Temporal fine structure mediated recognition of speech in the presence of multitalker babble. Nambi PM; Mahajan Y; Francis N; Bhat JS J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Oct; 140(4):EL296. PubMed ID: 27794309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of speech material on the benefit of temporal fine structure information in speech for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired participants. Lunner T; Hietkamp RK; Andersen MR; Hopkins K; Moore BC Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):377-88. PubMed ID: 22246137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Temporal Fine Structure Processing, Pitch, and Speech Perception in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients. Dincer D'Alessandro H; Ballantyne D; Boyle PJ; De Seta E; DeVincentiis M; Mancini P Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):679-686. PubMed ID: 29194080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Consonant identification using temporal fine structure and recovered envelope cues. Swaminathan J; Reed CM; Desloge JG; Braida LD; Delhorne LA J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Apr; 135(4):2078-90. PubMed ID: 25235005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Intonational cues for speech perception in noise by cochlear implant listeners. Dincer D'Alessandro H; Mancini P Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Dec; 277(12):3315-3321. PubMed ID: 32444968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Functional connectivity in the dorsal stream and between bilateral auditory-related cortical areas differentially contribute to speech decoding depending on spectro-temporal signal integrity and performance. Elmer S; Kühnis J; Rauch P; Abolfazl Valizadeh S; Jäncke L Neuropsychologia; 2017 Nov; 106():398-406. PubMed ID: 29106999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Human Frequency Following Response: Neural Representation of Envelope and Temporal Fine Structure in Listeners with Normal Hearing and Sensorineural Hearing Loss. Ananthakrishnan S; Krishnan A; Bartlett E Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):e91-e103. PubMed ID: 26583482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The use of visible speech cues for improving auditory detection of spoken sentences. Grant KW; Seitz PF J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):1197-208. PubMed ID: 11008820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Indications for temporal fine structure contribution to co-modulation masking release. Pierzycki RH; Seeber BU J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3614-24. PubMed ID: 21218893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]