These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25187066)

  • 1. What is the optimal time to estimate the final vascular response to a drug-eluting stent by optimal coherence tomography?
    Koh YS; Baek SH
    Circ J; 2014; 78(10):2376-7. PubMed ID: 25187066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vascular response to drug-eluting stent with biodegradable vs. durable polymer. Optical coherence tomography substudy of the NEXT.
    Kubo T; Akasaka T; Kozuma K; Kimura K; Fusazaki T; Okura H; Shinke T; Ino Y; Hasegawa T; Takashima H; Takamisawa I; Yamaguchi H; Igarashi K; Kadota K; Tanabe K; Nakagawa Y; Muramatsu T; Morino Y; Kimura T;
    Circ J; 2014; 78(10):2408-14. PubMed ID: 25099476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incidence of late-acquired stent malapposition of drug eluting stents with second generation permanent and biodegradable polymer coatings-A prospective, randomized comparison using optical coherence tomography.
    Roth C; Gangl C; Dalos D; Delle-Karth G; Neunteufl T; Berger R
    J Interv Cardiol; 2018 Dec; 31(6):780-791. PubMed ID: 30479028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of everolimus- and biolimus-eluting coronary stents with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds.
    Puricel S; Arroyo D; Corpataux N; Baeriswyl G; Lehmann S; Kallinikou Z; Muller O; Allard L; Stauffer JC; Togni M; Goy JJ; Cook S
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2015 Mar; 65(8):791-801. PubMed ID: 25720622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vascular response to bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent vs. permanent polymer everolimus-eluting stent at 9-month follow-up: an optical coherence tomography sub-study from the CENTURY II trial.
    Kuramitsu S; Kazuno Y; Sonoda S; Domei T; Jinnouchi H; Yamaji K; Soga Y; Shirai S; Ando K; Saito S
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jan; 17(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 26333375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early vascular healing with rapid breakdown biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents assessed by optical coherence tomography.
    Tada T; Byrne RA; Schuster T; Cuni R; Kitabata H; Tiroch K; Dirninger A; Gratze F; Kaspar K; Zenker G; Joner M; Schömig A; Kastrati A
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2013; 14(2):84-9. PubMed ID: 23352095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The OCT-ORION Study: A Randomized Optical Coherence Tomography Study Comparing Resolute Integrity to Biomatrix Drug-Eluting Stent on the Degree of Early Stent Healing and Late Lumen Loss.
    Lee SWL; Tam FCC; Lam SCC; Kong SL; Shea CP; Chan KKW; Wong MKL; Chan MPH; Wong AYT; Yung ASY; Lam YM; Zhang LW; Wu KKY; Mintz GS; Maehara A
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Apr; 11(4):e006034. PubMed ID: 29654119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. One-year head to head comparison of the neointimal response between sirolimus eluting stent with reservoir technology and everolimus eluting stent: an optical coherence tomography study.
    Shiratori Y; Brugaletta S; Alvarez-Contreras L; Azpeitia Y; Ospino N; Gaido S; Delahanty A; Santos A; Martin-Yuste V; Masotti M; Serruys PW; Windecker S; Sabaté M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Oct; 82(4):E428-36. PubMed ID: 23441068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical outcomes of biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting BioMatrix stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting Xience stents.
    Lee DH; Park TK; Song YB; Chun WJ; Choi RK; Jeong JO; Im ES; Kim SW; Lee JM; Yang JH; Hahn JY; Choi SH; Choi JH; Lee SH; Gwon HC
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0183079. PubMed ID: 28797113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biodegradable-Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stents versus Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents at One-Year Follow-Up: A Registry-Based Cohort Study.
    Parsa E; Saroukhani S; Majlessi F; Poorhosseini H; Lofti-Tokaldany M; Jalali A; Salarifar M; Nematipour E; Alidoosti M; Aghajani H; Amirzadegan A; Kassaian SE
    Tex Heart Inst J; 2016 Apr; 43(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 27127426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: Final 5-Year Report From the COMPARE II Trial (Abluminal Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent).
    Vlachojannis GJ; Smits PC; Hofma SH; Togni M; Vázquez N; Valdés M; Voudris V; Slagboom T; Goy JJ; den Heijer P; van der Ent M
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jun; 10(12):1215-1221. PubMed ID: 28579236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. First-in-human evaluation of a bioabsorbable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stent: imaging and clinical results of the DESSOLVE I Trial (DES with sirolimus and a bioabsorbable polymer for the treatment of patients with de novo lesion in the native coronary arteries).
    Ormiston J; Webster M; Stewart J; Vrolix M; Whitbourn R; Donohoe D; Knape C; Lansky A; Attizzani GF; Fitzgerald P; Kandzari DE; Wijns W
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1026-34. PubMed ID: 24055443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Very thin strut biodegradable polymer everolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents in allcomers with coronary artery disease (BIO-RESORT): a three-arm, randomised, non-inferiority trial.
    von Birgelen C; Kok MM; van der Heijden LC; Danse PW; Schotborgh CE; Scholte M; Gin RMTJ; Somi S; van Houwelingen KG; Stoel MG; de Man FHAF; Louwerenburg JHW; Hartmann M; Zocca P; Linssen GCM; van der Palen J; Doggen CJM; Löwik MM
    Lancet; 2016 Nov; 388(10060):2607-2617. PubMed ID: 27806902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultrathin-strut, biodegradable-polymer, sirolimus-eluting stents versus thin-strut, durable-polymer, everolimus-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary revascularisation: 5-year outcomes of the BIOSCIENCE randomised trial.
    Pilgrim T; Piccolo R; Heg D; Roffi M; Tüller D; Muller O; Moarof I; Siontis GCM; Cook S; Weilenmann D; Kaiser C; Cuculi F; Hunziker L; Eberli FR; Jüni P; Windecker S
    Lancet; 2018 Sep; 392(10149):737-746. PubMed ID: 30170848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intimal hyperplasia and vascular remodeling after everolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in diabetic patients: the randomized Diabetes and Drug-Eluting Stent (DiabeDES) IV Intravascular Ultrasound trial.
    Antonsen L; Maeng M; Thayssen P; Christiansen EH; Hansen KN; Kaltoft A; Hansen HS; Thuesen L; Lassen JF; Jensen LO
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 May; 83(6):864-72. PubMed ID: 23996918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. First-in-man randomised comparison of the BuMA Supreme biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus a durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting coronary stent: the PIONEER trial.
    von Birgelen C; Asano T; Amoroso G; Aminian A; Brugaletta S; Vrolix M; Hernandez-Antolín R; van de Harst P; Iñiguez A; Janssens L; Smits PC; Wykrzykowska JJ; Ribeiro VG; Pereira H; da Silva PC; Piek JJ; Onuma Y; Serruys PW; Sabaté M
    EuroIntervention; 2018 Apr; 13(17):2026-2035. PubMed ID: 28923787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two-year vascular responses to drug-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer versus durable polymer: An optical coherence tomography sub-study of the NEXT.
    Katayama Y; Kubo T; Akasaka T; Ino Y; Kimura K; Okura H; Shinke T; Igarashi K; Kadota K; Kozuma K; Tanabe K; Nakagawa Y; Muramatsu T; Morino Y; Kimura T;
    J Cardiol; 2017 Dec; 70(6):530-536. PubMed ID: 28536015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent for percutaneous coronary revascularisation (BIOSCIENCE): a randomised, single-blind, non-inferiority trial.
    Pilgrim T; Heg D; Roffi M; Tüller D; Muller O; Vuilliomenet A; Cook S; Weilenmann D; Kaiser C; Jamshidi P; Fahrni T; Moschovitis A; Noble S; Eberli FR; Wenaweser P; Jüni P; Windecker S
    Lancet; 2014 Dec; 384(9960):2111-22. PubMed ID: 25189359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of long-term in-stent vascular response between abluminal groove-filled biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent and durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent: 3-year OCT follow-up from the TARGET I trial.
    Xu B; Zhang YJ; Sun ZW; Qiao SB; Chen SL; Zhang RY; Pan DR; Pang S; Zhang Q; Xu L; Yang YJ; Leon MB; Gao RL
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Dec; 31(8):1489-96. PubMed ID: 26208685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optical coherence tomography findings: insights from the "randomised multicentre trial investigating angiographic outcomes of hybrid sirolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer compared with everolimus-eluting stents with durable polymer in chronic total occlusions" (PRISON IV) trial.
    Teeuwen K; Spoormans EM; Bennett J; Dubois C; Desmet W; Ughi GJ; Belmans A; Kelder JC; Tijssen JGP; Agostoni P; Suttorp MJ; Adriaenssens T
    EuroIntervention; 2017 Aug; 13(5):e522-e530. PubMed ID: 28512069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.